vivo X70 Pro+ vs Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra: A Deep Dive into Flagship Performance
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra emerges as the stronger choice. Its superior battery endurance (95h vs 84h) and faster charging (67W wired, 67W wireless) provide a more convenient daily experience. While the X70 Pro+ boasts a refined camera system, the Mi 11 Ultra’s overall package is more compelling.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo X70 Pro+ | Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 42, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| - | 1, 3, 28, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA - China | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, September 09 | 2021, March 29 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, September 17 | Available. Released 2021, April 02 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, glass back or silicone polymer back (eco leather), aluminum frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), ceramic back, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 164.5 x 75.2 x 8.9 mm (6.48 x 2.96 x 0.35 in) | 164.3 x 74.6 x 8.4 mm (6.47 x 2.94 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 209 g / 213 g (7.37 oz) | 234 g (8.25 oz) |
| - | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 1440 x 3200 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~517 ppi density) | 1440 x 3200 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~515 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 111.4 cm2 (~90.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.81 inches, 112.0 cm2 (~91.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | LTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 1000 nits (HBM), 1500 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, 900 nits (HBM), 1700 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X1 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-X1 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888+ 5G (5 nm) | Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888 5G (5 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 660 | Adreno 660 |
| OS | Android 11, upgradable to Android 14, Funtouch OS 14 (International), OriginOS 1.0 (China) | Android 11, upgradable to Android 13, MIUI 14 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| - | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, Zeiss optics, Zeiss T* lens coating, Pixel Shift, dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama, 1.1” AMOLED selfie display |
| Quad | 50 MP, f/1.6, (wide), 1/1.31", 1.2µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/3.4, 125mm (periscope telephoto), 1/4.4", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS, 5x optical zoom 12 MP, f/1.6, 50mm (telephoto), 1/2.93", 1.22µm, PDAF, OIS, 2x optical zoom 48 MP, f/2.2, 14mm, 114˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, AF, gimbal OIS | - |
| Single | - | 20 MP, f/2.2, 27mm (wide), 1/3.4", 0.8µm |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/2.0, 24mm (wide), 1/1.12", 1.4µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 48 MP, f/4.1, 120mm (periscope telephoto), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS, 5x optical zoom 48 MP, f/2.2, 12mm, 128˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF |
| Video | 8K@30fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS, HDR10+ | 8K@24fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240/960/1920fps, gyro-EIS, HDR10+ rec. |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.5, 24mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | 20 MP, f/2.2, 27mm (wide), 1/3.4", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/60fps, 720p@120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| - | 24-bit/192kHz audio Tuned by Harman Kardon | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct, DLNA |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| - | Virtual proximity sensing | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 55W wired 50W wireless 10W reverse wireless 5W reverse wired | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC4, 100% in 36 min 67W wireless, 100% in 39 min 10W reverse wireless |
| Type | 4500 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue, Orange | Ceramic White (Cosmic White), Ceramic Black (Cosmic Black) |
| Models | V2145A, V2114 | M2102K1G, M2102K1C |
| Price | About 720 EUR | About 1500 EUR |
| SAR | - | 1.08 W/kg (head) 0.81 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.55 W/kg (head) 0.99 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 95h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -24.3 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 688720 (v8) GeekBench: 3191 (v5.1) GFXBench: 33fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo X70 Pro+
- Slightly more compact design
- Natural color reproduction in photos
- Excellent gimbal stabilization for video
- Lower battery endurance
- Slower charging speeds
- No secondary display for selfies
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra
- Superior battery life
- Incredibly fast wired and wireless charging
- Larger main camera sensor for low-light performance
- Larger and heavier design
- Potentially more aggressive image processing
- Can run warmer under heavy load
Display Comparison
Both phones feature excellent displays, but subtle differences exist. The Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra’s display achieves 943 nits of peak brightness, slightly lower than the vivo X70 Pro+'s 1022 nits. However, the difference is unlikely to be noticeable in most real-world scenarios. The Mi 11 Ultra boasts an 'Infinite' contrast ratio, typical of AMOLED panels, while specifics for the X70 Pro+ are not provided. The X70 Pro+’s higher peak brightness could be advantageous for outdoor visibility, but the Mi 11 Ultra’s larger display area and potentially superior color calibration offer a more immersive viewing experience.
Camera Comparison
Both phones excel in photography and videography, but approach it differently. While both are capable of capturing stunning images, the X70 Pro+ is known for its natural color science and gimbal stabilization system, offering exceptional video smoothness. The Mi 11 Ultra, with its larger 1/1.12” sensor, excels in low-light photography, capturing more detail and dynamic range. Both phones offer versatile camera systems, but the Mi 11 Ultra’s sensor size gives it an edge in challenging lighting conditions. The inclusion of a secondary display on the Mi 11 Ultra allows for high-quality selfies using the main camera system, a feature absent on the X70 Pro+.
Performance
The core difference lies in the Snapdragon 888+ in the X70 Pro+ versus the standard Snapdragon 888 in the Mi 11 Ultra. The ‘+’ variant features a slightly higher clock speed (3.0 GHz vs 2.84 GHz) on the prime Cortex-X1 core. While this translates to a marginal performance boost in benchmarks, the real-world impact is minimal. Both phones utilize the same LPDDR5 RAM configuration. Thermal management is a key consideration; the Snapdragon 888 series is known to throttle under sustained load. The Mi 11 Ultra’s larger chassis may offer slightly better heat dissipation, but both devices will experience performance dips during extended gaming sessions.
Battery Life
The Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra’s 95-hour endurance rating significantly surpasses the vivo X70 Pro+'s 84-hour rating. This translates to a noticeable difference in real-world usage. The Mi 11 Ultra also boasts significantly faster charging speeds: 67W wired (36 minutes to 100%) and 67W wireless (39 minutes to 100%) compared to the X70 Pro+'s 55W wired and 50W wireless. While both offer reverse wireless charging, the Mi 11 Ultra’s faster charging capabilities provide a more convenient and efficient user experience.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo X70 Pro+ if you prioritize a slightly more compact form factor and a camera system tuned for natural color reproduction. This phone is ideal for photography enthusiasts who prefer a less processed look. Buy the Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra if you value all-day battery life, incredibly fast charging speeds, and a more robust feature set, including a secondary display for quick glances and selfies.