vivo X70 Pro+ vs Oppo Find X3 Pro: A Deep Dive into Flagship Performance
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the vivo X70 Pro+ emerges as the superior choice. Its brighter display (1022 nits vs 774 nits) and slightly faster processor (Snapdragon 888+ vs 888) provide a noticeable edge in everyday use and demanding tasks, while the comparable battery life keeps it competitive.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo X70 Pro+ | Oppo Find X3 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| - | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA - China | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, September 09 | 2021, March 11 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, September 17 | Available. Released 2021, March 19 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, glass back or silicone polymer back (eco leather), aluminum frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 164.5 x 75.2 x 8.9 mm (6.48 x 2.96 x 0.35 in) | 163.6 x 74 x 8.3 mm (6.44 x 2.91 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM |
| Weight | 209 g / 213 g (7.37 oz) | 193 g (6.81 oz) |
| - | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1440 x 3200 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~517 ppi density) | 1440 x 3216 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~525 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 111.4 cm2 (~90.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 108.4 cm2 (~89.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | LTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 1000 nits (HBM), 1500 nits (peak) | LTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, BT.2020, 500 nits (typ), 1300 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X1 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-X1 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888+ 5G (5 nm) | Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888 5G (5 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 660 | Adreno 660 |
| OS | Android 11, upgradable to Android 14, Funtouch OS 14 (International), OriginOS 1.0 (China) | Android 11, upgradable to Android 14, ColorOS 14 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM |
| - | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, Zeiss optics, Zeiss T* lens coating, Pixel Shift, dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 50 MP, f/1.6, (wide), 1/1.31", 1.2µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/3.4, 125mm (periscope telephoto), 1/4.4", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS, 5x optical zoom 12 MP, f/1.6, 50mm (telephoto), 1/2.93", 1.22µm, PDAF, OIS, 2x optical zoom 48 MP, f/2.2, 14mm, 114˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, AF, gimbal OIS | 50 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.4, 52mm (telephoto), 1/3.4", 1.0µm, 2x optical zoom, PDAF 50 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 110˚ (ultrawide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF 3 MP, f/3.0, (microscope), AF, ring flash, 60x magnification |
| Video | 8K@30fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS, HDR10+ | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps; gyro-EIS; HDR, 10‑bit video |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | Panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.5, 24mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | 32 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 55W wired 50W wireless 10W reverse wireless 5W reverse wired | 65W wired, PD, 40% in 10 min 30W wireless, 100% in 80 min 10W reverse wireless |
| Type | 4500 mAh | Li-Po 4500 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue, Orange | Gloss Black, Blue, White, Cosmic Mocha, Mars Edition, Photographer Edition |
| Models | V2145A, V2114 | CPH2173, PEEM00, OPG03 |
| Price | About 720 EUR | About 200 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 81h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -25.4 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 656467 (v8) GeekBench: 3316 (v5.1) GFXBench: 33fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo X70 Pro+
- Brighter display for better outdoor visibility
- Faster Snapdragon 888+ processor
- Faster wireless charging (50W)
- 5W reverse wired charging
- Potentially higher price point
- Design may be less understated than the Oppo
Oppo Find X3 Pro
- Faster wired charging (65W)
- Potentially lower price on the used market
- Sleek and understated design
- Infinite contrast ratio (marketing claim)
- Dimmer display
- Slightly slower processor (Snapdragon 888)
Display Comparison
The vivo X70 Pro+ boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 1022 nits compared to the Oppo Find X3 Pro’s 774 nits. This translates to better outdoor visibility, especially in direct sunlight. While both displays likely utilize high refresh rate panels (not specified in the data, but standard for this class), the brightness difference is a key differentiator. The Oppo Find X3 Pro does claim an infinite contrast ratio, suggesting excellent black levels, but this is a common marketing claim and doesn't necessarily translate to a superior viewing experience over the X70 Pro+'s brighter panel.
Camera Comparison
Both devices are marketed as camera-focused flagships, but specific sensor details are absent. However, the X70 Pro+’s positioning suggests a more comprehensive camera system. While both offer photo and video capabilities, the X70 Pro+ likely prioritizes image processing geared towards natural color reproduction, a hallmark of the vivo brand. The Oppo Find X3 Pro, on the other hand, may lean towards a more vibrant and saturated look. Without detailed sensor specifications, it’s difficult to definitively declare a winner, but the X70 Pro+'s flagship+ status implies a more advanced imaging setup.
Performance
Both phones are powered by the Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G series, but the vivo X70 Pro+ steps up to the Snapdragon 888+ 5G. The ‘+’ variant features a slightly higher clock speed on the prime Cortex-X1 core (3.0 GHz vs 2.84 GHz), offering a marginal performance boost in CPU-intensive tasks. Both utilize the same CPU architecture (Octa-core with 1x Cortex-X1, 3x Cortex-A78, and 4x Cortex-A55). The real-world impact will be most noticeable in sustained workloads where thermal throttling might occur; the 888+ is generally more efficient. Both devices likely employ LPDDR5 RAM, though the speed isn't specified, and the 5nm fabrication process ensures reasonable power efficiency.
Battery Life
The battery endurance ratings are remarkably close, with the vivo X70 Pro+ achieving 84 hours and the Oppo Find X3 Pro managing 81 hours. This suggests similar real-world battery life despite the lack of specified mAh capacities. However, the charging speeds are where the X70 Pro+ pulls ahead. It supports 55W wired charging, 50W wireless charging, and even 10W reverse wireless charging. The Oppo Find X3 Pro offers a faster 65W wired charge (with a claimed 40% charge in 10 minutes) and 30W wireless charging, but the X70 Pro+'s wireless charging is significantly faster. The inclusion of 5W reverse wired charging on the X70 Pro+ is a unique feature for emergency top-ups.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo X70 Pro+ if you prioritize camera versatility, a brighter and more vibrant display, and the fastest possible charging speeds – both wired and wireless. Buy the Oppo Find X3 Pro if you value a slightly more understated design aesthetic and potentially find a better deal on the used market, accepting a trade-off in display brightness and charging speed.