vivo X70 Pro+ vs OnePlus 9 Pro: A Deep Dive into Flagship Performance
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing camera versatility and faster charging, the vivo X70 Pro+ emerges as the winner. Its Snapdragon 888+ offers a slight performance edge, and its charging speeds are notably quicker. However, the OnePlus 9 Pro remains a strong contender with a slightly better endurance rating and a refined software experience.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo X70 Pro+ | OnePlus 9 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1800 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - EU |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 78 SA/NSA - EU |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat20 2000/200 Mbps, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| - | 1, 3, 28, 41, 78, 79 SA/NSA - CN | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, September 09 | 2021, March 23 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, September 17 | Available. Released 2021, March 30 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, glass back or silicone polymer back (eco leather), aluminum frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 164.5 x 75.2 x 8.9 mm (6.48 x 2.96 x 0.35 in) | 163.2 x 73.6 x 8.7 mm (6.43 x 2.90 x 0.34 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 209 g / 213 g (7.37 oz) | 197 g (6.95 oz) |
| - | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1440 x 3200 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~517 ppi density) | 1440 x 3216 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~525 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 111.4 cm2 (~90.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 108.4 cm2 (~90.3% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | LTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 1000 nits (HBM), 1500 nits (peak) | LTPO Fluid2 AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1300 nits (peak) |
| - | Always-on display | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X1 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-X1 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55 |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888+ 5G (5 nm) | Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888 5G (5 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 660 | Adreno 660 |
| OS | Android 11, upgradable to Android 14, Funtouch OS 14 (International), OriginOS 1.0 (China) | Android 11, upgradable to Android 14, OxygenOS 14 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| - | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, Zeiss optics, Zeiss T* lens coating, Pixel Shift, dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, Hasselblad Color Calibration, dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 50 MP, f/1.6, (wide), 1/1.31", 1.2µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/3.4, 125mm (periscope telephoto), 1/4.4", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS, 5x optical zoom 12 MP, f/1.6, 50mm (telephoto), 1/2.93", 1.22µm, PDAF, OIS, 2x optical zoom 48 MP, f/2.2, 14mm, 114˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, AF, gimbal OIS | 48 MP, f/1.8, 23mm (wide), 1/1.43", 1.12µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.4, 77mm (telephoto), 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS, 3.3x optical zoom 50 MP, f/2.2, 14mm (ultrawide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, AF 2 MP, f/2.4, (monochrome) |
| Single | - | 16 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 8K@30fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS, HDR10+ | 8K@30fps, 4K@30/60/120fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps, Auto HDR, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.5, 24mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | 16 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| - | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1), GALILEO (E1+E5a) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct, DLNA |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 55W wired 50W wireless 10W reverse wireless 5W reverse wired | 65W wired, PD, 100% in 29 min 50W wireless, 100% in 43 min 5W reverse wireless |
| Type | 4500 mAh | Li-Po 4500 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue, Orange | Morning Mist, Forest Green, Stellar Black |
| Models | V2145A, V2114 | LE2121, LE2125, LE2123, LE2120, LE2127 |
| Price | About 720 EUR | € 246.17 / $ 264.95 / £ 287.00 |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 86h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Loudspeaker | - | -24.1 LUFS (Very good) |
vivo X70 Pro+
- Slightly faster processor (Snapdragon 888+)
- Faster wired and wireless charging
- Brighter display for outdoor visibility
- Slightly lower battery endurance rating
- Software experience may be less refined than OnePlus
OnePlus 9 Pro
- Slightly better battery endurance rating
- Refined and streamlined software experience
- Faster wired charging time (0-100%)
- Slower processor (Snapdragon 888)
- Lower peak display brightness
Display Comparison
Both devices feature excellent displays, but the vivo X70 Pro+ boasts a marginally brighter panel at 1022 nits compared to the OnePlus 9 Pro’s 859 nits. This translates to better visibility under direct sunlight. While both likely utilize AMOLED technology (though not explicitly stated), the difference in peak brightness is measurable. The absence of refresh rate data prevents a full comparison of smoothness, but both are expected to offer at least 120Hz. Bezels appear comparable based on available imagery, and color accuracy is likely excellent on both, given the flagship status.
Camera Comparison
Both phones are marketed as camera-centric, but the specifics are missing to provide a detailed comparison. However, the absence of sensor size data necessitates focusing on the overall system. The fact that both are described as 'Photo / Video' devices suggests a balanced approach. The vivo brand historically emphasizes image processing geared towards vibrant colors and detail, while OnePlus often aims for a more natural look. Without detailed sensor information, it’s difficult to definitively declare a winner, but the X70 Pro+'s brand reputation suggests a stronger focus on photographic capabilities.
Performance
The vivo X70 Pro+ utilizes the Snapdragon 888+ 5G, a slightly refined version of the Snapdragon 888 found in the OnePlus 9 Pro. The 888+ features a higher clock speed on its prime Cortex-X1 core (3.0 GHz vs 2.84 GHz), potentially leading to a small but noticeable performance boost in demanding tasks. Both phones share the same CPU configuration for the A78 and A55 cores. While both utilize 5nm fabrication, the 888+’s optimizations could result in slightly better thermal management. The lack of RAM specifications prevents a detailed analysis of memory performance, but both are expected to employ LPDDR5 for fast data transfer.
Battery Life
The OnePlus 9 Pro edges out the vivo X70 Pro+ in endurance rating with 86 hours versus 84 hours, suggesting slightly more efficient power management. However, the vivo X70 Pro+ compensates with significantly faster charging speeds: 55W wired, 50W wireless, and even 10W reverse wireless. The OnePlus 9 Pro offers 65W wired charging (reaching 100% in 29 minutes), 50W wireless (100% in 43 minutes), and 5W reverse wireless. The vivo’s faster wired and wireless charging, combined with reverse wireless and wired options, provides greater flexibility and convenience for users constantly on the go.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo X70 Pro+ if you need a top-tier mobile photography experience with exceptional low-light performance and value rapid charging capabilities. Buy the OnePlus 9 Pro if you prefer a cleaner, more streamlined software experience with a focus on smooth daily usage and slightly longer battery life between charges.