vivo X70 Pro+ vs. Huawei P50 Pro: A Head-to-Head Flagship Battle
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the vivo X70 Pro+ emerges as the stronger choice. Its Snapdragon 888+ chipset provides a more consistently powerful experience, especially for demanding tasks and gaming, and its brighter display enhances outdoor visibility. While the Huawei P50 Pro boasts a refined camera system, the limitations of its 4G connectivity and chipset availability hold it back.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo X70 Pro+ | Huawei P50 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 - China |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA | - |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE |
| - | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - International | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, September 09 | 2021, July 29 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, September 17 | Available. Released 2021, August 12 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, glass back or silicone polymer back (eco leather), aluminum frame | Glass front, glass back, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 164.5 x 75.2 x 8.9 mm (6.48 x 2.96 x 0.35 in) | 158.8 x 72.8 x 8.5 mm (6.25 x 2.87 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 209 g / 213 g (7.37 oz) | 195 g (6.88 oz) |
| - | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Resolution | 1440 x 3200 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~517 ppi density) | 1228 x 2700 pixels (~450 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 111.4 cm2 (~90.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.6 inches, 105.4 cm2 (~91.2% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | LTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 1000 nits (HBM), 1500 nits (peak) | OLED, 1B colors, 120Hz |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X1 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.13 GHz Cortex-A77 & 3x2.54 GHz Cortex-A77 & 4x2.05 GHz Cortex-A55)Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-X1 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888+ 5G (5 nm) | Kirin 9000 (5 nm)Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888 4G (5 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 660 | Mali-G78 MP24Adreno 660 |
| OS | Android 11, upgradable to Android 14, Funtouch OS 14 (International), OriginOS 1.0 (China) | HarmonyOS 2.0 (China), EMUI 14.2 (Europe), no Google Play Services |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | Nano Memory (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 512GB 8GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, Zeiss optics, Zeiss T* lens coating, Pixel Shift, dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, Leica optics, dual-LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Quad | 50 MP, f/1.6, (wide), 1/1.31", 1.2µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/3.4, 125mm (periscope telephoto), 1/4.4", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS, 5x optical zoom 12 MP, f/1.6, 50mm (telephoto), 1/2.93", 1.22µm, PDAF, OIS, 2x optical zoom 48 MP, f/2.2, 14mm, 114˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, AF, gimbal OIS | 50 MP, f/1.8, 23mm (wide), PDAF, OIS 64 MP, f/3.5, 90mm (periscope telephoto), PDAF, OIS, 3.5x optical zoom, 7x lossless zoom 13 MP, f/2.2, 13mm (ultrawide), AF 40 MP, f/1.6, 23mm (B/W), AF |
| Single | - | 13 MP, f/2.4, (wide), AF |
| Video | 8K@30fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS, HDR10+ | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, 1080p@960fps; gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | Panorama, HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.5, 24mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | 13 MP, f/2.4, (wide), AF |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a+B2b), GALILEO (E1+E5a+E5b), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 55W wired 50W wireless 10W reverse wireless 5W reverse wired | 66W wired 50W wireless Reverse wireless charging |
| Type | 4500 mAh | Li-Po 4360 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue, Orange | Golden Black, Cocoa Gold, Pearl White, Charm Pink |
| Models | V2145A, V2114 | JAD-AL50, JAD-LX9, JAD-AL00 |
| Price | About 720 EUR | $ 196.62 / £ 329.00 / € 473.13 |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 76h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -27.3 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 793876 (v8), 786215 (v9) GeekBench: 3145 (v5.1) GFXBench: 44fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo X70 Pro+
- Superior performance with Snapdragon 888+
- Brighter display for outdoor visibility
- Longer battery endurance
- 5G connectivity
- Software experience may not appeal to all
- Design may be considered less refined by some
Huawei P50 Pro
- Distinctive camera processing style
- Faster 66W wired charging
- Potentially more understated design
- Strong brand recognition
- Limited to 4G connectivity (Snapdragon variant)
- Chipset availability concerns (Kirin variant)
- Lower display brightness
- Shorter battery endurance
Display Comparison
The vivo X70 Pro+ features a display capable of reaching 1022 nits of peak brightness, significantly outshining the Huawei P50 Pro’s 754 nits. This difference translates to superior readability under direct sunlight. While both displays offer an 'infinite' contrast ratio (nominal), the higher peak brightness of the vivo gives it a clear advantage for HDR content viewing. Neither specification details refresh rate or panel type, but both are expected to be high-quality OLED panels. The P50 Pro's contrast ratio specification, while technically correct, doesn't offer a tangible benefit over the vivo without knowing the actual contrast performance.
Camera Comparison
Both phones excel in photography, but approach it differently. Both are listed as having Photo/Video capabilities, but detailed sensor information is missing. The Huawei P50 Pro is known for its distinctive color science and computational photography, often producing images with a more stylized look. The vivo X70 Pro+ benefits from the Snapdragon 888+'s superior image signal processor (ISP), potentially leading to faster processing and better low-light performance. Without specific sensor size and aperture details, it’s difficult to definitively declare a winner, but the vivo’s chipset advantage and potential for wider availability of advanced features like 8K video recording give it a slight edge. The absence of details on the 2MP macro cameras on either device suggests they are largely marketing features.
Performance
The vivo X70 Pro+ is powered by the Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ 5G (5nm), while the Huawei P50 Pro comes in two configurations: the Kirin 9000 (5nm) and a Snapdragon 888 4G (5nm). The Snapdragon 888+ in the vivo offers a slight performance edge over both Kirin and the non-plus Snapdragon 888, thanks to its higher clock speeds (3.0 GHz Cortex-X1 vs 3.13 GHz Cortex-A77 and 2.84 GHz Cortex-X1 respectively). Crucially, the vivo supports 5G connectivity, while the Snapdragon 888 variant in the P50 Pro is limited to 4G. The Kirin 9000, while powerful, suffers from supply chain issues and regional availability. Both phones utilize an octa-core CPU configuration, but the architectural differences – Cortex-X1 in the vivo versus Cortex-A77 in the Huawei – contribute to the Snapdragon’s superior sustained performance.
Battery Life
The vivo X70 Pro+ boasts an endurance rating of 84 hours, while the Huawei P50 Pro achieves 76 hours. This suggests the vivo offers better overall battery life despite having a similar capacity (not specified in the data). The vivo supports 55W wired charging, 50W wireless charging, and even 10W reverse wireless charging, offering greater flexibility. The Huawei P50 Pro matches the 50W wireless charging but offers faster 66W wired charging. The vivo’s reverse wired charging at 5W is a niche feature, but adds convenience. The combination of longer endurance and versatile charging options favors the vivo.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo X70 Pro+ if you prioritize raw performance, consistent 5G connectivity, and a brighter, more vibrant display for multimedia consumption. Buy the Huawei P50 Pro if you value a distinct photographic style, prefer a more understated design, and are willing to compromise on 5G and potentially chipset availability depending on your region.