vivo X70 Pro+ vs Google Pixel 6 Pro: A Head-to-Head Flagship Battle
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing consistent performance and faster charging, the vivo X70 Pro+ emerges as the winner. Its Snapdragon 888+ and 55W charging offer a smoother experience, especially for demanding tasks. However, the Pixel 6 Pro’s unique software features and computational photography prowess make it a compelling alternative for photography enthusiasts.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo X70 Pro+ | Google Pixel 6 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 46, 48, 66, 71 - GLUOG, G8VOU |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 14, 20, 25, 28, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71, 77, 78, 257, 258, 260, 261 SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave - G8VOU |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| - | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 14, 20, 25, 28, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - GLUOG | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, September 09 | 2021, October 19 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, September 17 | Available. Released 2021, October 28 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, glass back or silicone polymer back (eco leather), aluminum frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), glass back (Gorilla Glass Victus), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 164.5 x 75.2 x 8.9 mm (6.48 x 2.96 x 0.35 in) | 163.9 x 75.9 x 8.9 mm (6.45 x 2.99 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM |
| Weight | 209 g / 213 g (7.37 oz) | 210 g (7.41 oz) |
| - | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 1440 x 3200 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~517 ppi density) | 1440 x 3120 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~512 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 111.4 cm2 (~90.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 110.6 cm2 (~88.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | LTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 1000 nits (HBM), 1500 nits (peak) | LTPO AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+ |
| - | Always-on display | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X1 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.80 GHz Cortex-X1 & 2x2.25 GHz Cortex-A76 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888+ 5G (5 nm) | Google Tensor (5 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 660 | Mali-G78 MP20 |
| OS | Android 11, upgradable to Android 14, Funtouch OS 14 (International), OriginOS 1.0 (China) | Android 12, upgradable to Android 15, up to 5 major Android upgrades |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| - | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, Zeiss optics, Zeiss T* lens coating, Pixel Shift, dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | Laser AF, Dual-LED flash, Pixel Shift, Auto-HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 50 MP, f/1.6, (wide), 1/1.31", 1.2µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/3.4, 125mm (periscope telephoto), 1/4.4", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS, 5x optical zoom 12 MP, f/1.6, 50mm (telephoto), 1/2.93", 1.22µm, PDAF, OIS, 2x optical zoom 48 MP, f/2.2, 14mm, 114˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, AF, gimbal OIS | - |
| Single | - | 11.1 MP, f/2.2, 20mm (ultrawide), 1.22µm |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.9, 25mm (wide), 1/1.31", 1.2µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 48 MP, f/3.5, 104mm (periscope telephoto), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS, 4x optical zoom 12 MP, f/2.2, 17mm, 114˚ (ultrawide), 1.25µm |
| Video | 8K@30fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS, HDR10+ | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps; gyro-EIS, OIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.5, 24mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | 11.1 MP, f/2.2, 20mm (ultrawide), 1.22µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG | USB Type-C 3.1 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| - | Ultra Wideband (UWB) support | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 55W wired 50W wireless 10W reverse wireless 5W reverse wired | 23W wired, PD3.0, 50% in 30 min 23W wireless Reverse wireless |
| Type | 4500 mAh | Li-Ion 5003 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue, Orange | Cloudy White, Sorta Sunny, Stormy Black |
| Models | V2145A, V2114 | GLUOG, G8VOU, GF5KQ |
| Price | About 720 EUR | € 199.99 / $ 204.99 / £ 275.00 / ₹ 29,699 |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 84h |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 585485 (v8), 719815 (v9) GeekBench: 2831 (v5.1) GFXBench: 39 fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo X70 Pro+
- Faster 55W wired and 50W wireless charging
- More powerful Snapdragon 888+ chipset for sustained performance
- Likely more versatile camera hardware and manual controls
- Funtouch OS may not appeal to all users
- Less emphasis on computational photography features
Google Pixel 6 Pro
- Clean Android experience with guaranteed updates
- Exceptional computational photography and AI features
- Unique software features like Magic Eraser and Live Translate
- Slower 23W charging speeds
- Google Tensor chip may throttle under sustained load
Display Comparison
Both phones feature excellent displays, but the vivo X70 Pro+ edges out the Pixel 6 Pro with a measured peak brightness of 1022 nits compared to the Pixel’s 846 nits. This translates to better visibility under direct sunlight. While the Pixel 6 Pro boasts an infinite contrast ratio, the X70 Pro+'s brightness advantage is more immediately noticeable in everyday use. Both displays are large, but the X70 Pro+’s panel is likely to be more vibrant outdoors.
Camera Comparison
Both phones are camera powerhouses, but approach image capture differently. The X70 Pro+ likely features a more traditional camera setup focused on hardware capabilities, while the Pixel 6 Pro leans heavily on Google’s computational photography. While specific sensor details are missing, the X70 Pro+’s brand reputation suggests a focus on versatile lens options and high-resolution sensors. The Pixel 6 Pro’s strength lies in its image processing, delivering consistently excellent results in various lighting conditions. The Tensor chip’s dedicated image processing unit plays a crucial role in features like Magic Eraser and Face Unblur. The X70 Pro+ likely offers more manual control and flexibility for experienced photographers.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The vivo X70 Pro+ utilizes the Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ 5G (5nm), featuring an octa-core configuration with a prime Cortex-X1 core clocked at 3.0 GHz. The Google Pixel 6 Pro, however, is powered by Google’s in-house Tensor chip (5nm). While the Tensor’s Cortex-X1 cores are clocked slightly higher at 2.8 GHz, the Snapdragon 888+ benefits from Qualcomm’s established optimization and a more mature architecture. This often results in more sustained performance and better thermal management, particularly during extended gaming sessions. The Pixel 6 Pro's Tensor chip excels in AI and machine learning tasks, powering features like Live Translate, but may exhibit more throttling under heavy load.
Battery Life
Both devices share an endurance rating of 84 hours, suggesting comparable battery life despite differing charging speeds. However, the X70 Pro+ significantly outperforms the Pixel 6 Pro in charging speed, offering 55W wired charging, 50W wireless charging, and even 10W reverse wireless charging. The Pixel 6 Pro is limited to 23W wired and wireless charging, taking considerably longer to reach a full charge. The X70 Pro+'s faster charging is a significant advantage for users who frequently need to top up their battery quickly.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo X70 Pro+ if you need a phone that excels in demanding tasks like gaming and video editing, and if fast charging is a priority. Its Snapdragon 888+ chipset and robust charging capabilities cater to power users. Buy the Google Pixel 6 Pro if you prefer a clean Android experience, exceptional computational photography, and a focus on software-driven features like Magic Eraser, and are willing to trade some raw performance for these advantages.