vivo X70 Pro vs Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra: Which Flagship Reigns Supreme?
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the vivo X70 Pro emerges as the more compelling choice. Its excellent camera system, coupled with a respectable battery life and the efficiency of the Dimensity 1200 (or Exynos 1080), provides a smoother, more balanced experience than the power-hungry Mi 11 Ultra.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo X70 Pro | Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 9, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41 - International | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 42, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 28, 40, 41, 78, 79 SA/NSA - International | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| 3, 5, 77, 78 SA/NSA - India | 1, 3, 28, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA - China | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, September 09 | 2021, March 29 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, September 17 | Available. Released 2021, April 02 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Schott Xensation Up), glass back, aluminum frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), ceramic back, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 158.3 x 73.2 x 8 mm (6.23 x 2.88 x 0.31 in) | 164.3 x 74.6 x 8.4 mm (6.47 x 2.94 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 183/184/185/186 g (6.46 oz) | 234 g (8.25 oz) |
| - | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Schott Xensation Up | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2376 pixels (~398 ppi density) | 1440 x 3200 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~515 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.56 inches, 104.6 cm2 (~90.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.81 inches, 112.0 cm2 (~91.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1300 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, 900 nits (HBM), 1700 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) - InternationalOcta-core (1x2.8 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) - China | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-X1 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 1200 (6 nm) - InternationalExynos 1080 (5 nm) - China | Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888 5G (5 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 - InternationalMali-G78 MP10 - China | Adreno 660 |
| OS | Android 11, upgradable to Android 14, Funtouch OS 14 (International), OriginOS (China) | Android 11, upgradable to Android 13, MIUI 14 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, Zeiss optics, Zeiss T* lens coating, Pixel Shift, dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama, 1.1” AMOLED selfie display |
| Quad | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, gimbal OIS 8 MP, f/3.4, 125mm (periscope telephoto), 1/4.4", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS, 5x optical zoom 12 MP, f/2.0, 50mm (telephoto), 1/2.93", 1.22µm, PDAF, 2x optical zoom 12 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 116˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.1", 1.12µm, AF | - |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.5, 24mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | 20 MP, f/2.2, 27mm (wide), 1/3.4", 0.8µm |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/2.0, 24mm (wide), 1/1.12", 1.4µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 48 MP, f/4.1, 120mm (periscope telephoto), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS, 5x optical zoom 48 MP, f/2.2, 12mm, 128˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS, HDR10+ | 8K@24fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240/960/1920fps, gyro-EIS, HDR10+ rec. |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.5, 24mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | 20 MP, f/2.2, 27mm (wide), 1/3.4", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/60fps, 720p@120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 32-bit/192kHz audio | 24-bit/192kHz audio Tuned by Harman Kardon | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS, NavIC | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct, DLNA |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| - | Virtual proximity sensing | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 44W wired 5W reverse wired | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC4, 100% in 36 min 67W wireless, 100% in 39 min 10W reverse wireless |
| Type | 4450 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Cosmic Black, Aurora Dawn, White | Ceramic White (Cosmic White), Ceramic Black (Cosmic Black) |
| Models | V2134A, V2105 | M2102K1G, M2102K1C |
| Price | About 1040 EUR | About 1500 EUR |
| SAR | - | 1.08 W/kg (head) 0.81 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.55 W/kg (head) 0.99 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | Endurance rating 123h | Endurance rating 95h |
| Camera | Photo / Video | Photo / Video |
| Display | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | -27.5 LUFS (Good) | -24.3 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 694499 (v9) GeekBench: 2956 (v5.1) GFXBench: 40fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | AnTuTu: 688720 (v8) GeekBench: 3191 (v5.1) GFXBench: 33fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo X70 Pro
- Superior battery life (123h endurance)
- More efficient chipset (Dimensity 1200/Exynos 1080)
- Excellent camera with Zeiss optics and gimbal stabilization
- Slower charging speeds compared to Mi 11 Ultra
- Chipset may not match Snapdragon 888 in peak performance
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra
- Blazing-fast 67W wired and wireless charging
- Powerful Snapdragon 888 processor
- Large, vibrant display
- Significantly shorter battery life (95h endurance)
- Prone to thermal throttling under heavy load
- Aggressive image processing may not appeal to all
Display Comparison
Both the vivo X70 Pro and Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra feature excellent displays with 'Infinite' contrast ratios, typical of OLED panels. However, the X70 Pro edges out the Mi 11 Ultra with a measured peak brightness of 993 nits compared to 943 nits. While the difference isn't massive, it translates to slightly better visibility in direct sunlight. Neither manufacturer specifies refresh rate or PWM dimming rates, but both are expected to offer smooth scrolling and adequate low-light viewing. The Mi 11 Ultra’s larger display size is a factor for media consumption, but the X70 Pro’s brightness gives it a slight advantage in usability.
Camera Comparison
Both phones excel in photography, but approach it differently. While detailed sensor specs are not provided, both are clearly equipped for both photo and video. The Mi 11 Ultra’s larger sensor size (likely) and aggressive image processing aim for striking, often saturated, results. The X70 Pro, leveraging vivo’s partnership with Zeiss, focuses on color accuracy and natural-looking images. The Mi 11 Ultra’s secondary cameras, including a periscope zoom, offer versatility, but the X70 Pro’s gimbal stabilization system provides a significant advantage in video recording, reducing shake and improving overall stability. The lack of detail on the 2MP macro cameras on both devices suggests limited utility.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra boasts the Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 (5nm), while the vivo X70 Pro utilizes either the Mediatek Dimensity 1200 (6nm - International) or the Exynos 1080 (5nm - China). The Snapdragon 888, with its Cortex-X1 prime core, offers peak performance advantages, particularly in GPU-intensive tasks. However, the 6nm Dimensity 1200 and 5nm Exynos 1080 are more efficient, leading to better thermal management and sustained performance. The Mi 11 Ultra is known to throttle under prolonged load, while the X70 Pro maintains more consistent performance. The CPU architecture differences – Snapdragon’s Cortex-X1 vs Dimensity/Exynos’ Cortex-A78 – contribute to this, with the X1 prioritizing burst performance over sustained efficiency.
Battery Life
Battery life is a clear win for the vivo X70 Pro. Its endurance rating of 123 hours significantly surpasses the Mi 11 Ultra’s 95 hours. This difference is attributable to the more efficient chipset and optimized software. While the Mi 11 Ultra compensates with incredibly fast 67W wired charging (36 minutes to 100%) and 67W wireless charging (39 minutes to 100%), the X70 Pro’s 44W wired charging is still respectable. The Mi 11 Ultra’s faster charging is beneficial for power users, but the X70 Pro’s longer battery life reduces the need for frequent top-ups.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo X70 Pro if you prioritize camera versatility, consistent performance, and a more manageable battery drain. It’s ideal for photography enthusiasts and users who value a refined software experience. Buy the Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra if you demand the absolute fastest performance for demanding tasks like gaming, and if you value incredibly fast wired *and* wireless charging, even at the expense of battery life and potential thermal throttling.