vivo X70 Pro vs vivo X70: A Detailed Comparison
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The vivo X70 Pro emerges as the clear winner, boasting a brighter display, potentially superior camera capabilities (depending on region), and a more refined overall experience. However, the X70 remains a compelling option for those seeking excellent value and solid performance without the Pro's premium price tag.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo X70 Pro | vivo X70 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 9, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41 - International | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 28, 40, 41, 78, 79 SA/NSA - International | 1, 3, 5, 7, 28, 40, 41, 78 SA/NSA - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| 3, 5, 77, 78 SA/NSA - India | - | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, September 09 | 2021, September 09 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, September 17 | Available. Released 2021, September 30 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Schott Xensation Up), glass back, aluminum frame | - |
| Dimensions | 158.3 x 73.2 x 8 mm (6.23 x 2.88 x 0.31 in) | 160.1 x 75.4 x 7.6 mm (6.30 x 2.97 x 0.30 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 183/184/185/186 g (6.46 oz) | 181/182 g (6.42 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Schott Xensation Up | - |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2376 pixels (~398 ppi density) | 1080 x 2376 pixels (~398 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.56 inches, 104.6 cm2 (~90.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.56 inches, 104.6 cm2 (~86.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1300 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+ |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) - InternationalOcta-core (1x2.8 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) - China | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 1200 (6 nm) - InternationalExynos 1080 (5 nm) - China | Mediatek Dimensity 1200 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 - InternationalMali-G78 MP10 - China | Mali-G77 MC9 |
| OS | Android 11, upgradable to Android 14, Funtouch OS 14 (International), OriginOS (China) | Android 11, upgradable to Android 14, Funtouch OS 14 (International), OriginOS (China) |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 128GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | - | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, Zeiss optics, Zeiss T* lens coating, Pixel Shift, dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | Zeiss optics, Zeiss T* lens coating, color spectrum sensor, Pixel Shift, dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, gimbal OIS 8 MP, f/3.4, 125mm (periscope telephoto), 1/4.4", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS, 5x optical zoom 12 MP, f/2.0, 50mm (telephoto), 1/2.93", 1.22µm, PDAF, 2x optical zoom 12 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 116˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.1", 1.12µm, AF | 40 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1.0µm, PDAF 12 MP, f/2.0, 50mm (telephoto), 1/2.93", 1.22µm, PDAF, 2x optical zoom 12 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 116˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.1", 1.12µm |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.5, 24mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | - |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS, HDR10+ | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS, HDR10+ |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.5, 24mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | 32 MP, f/2.5, 24mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| 32-bit/192kHz audio | - | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS, NavIC | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS, NavIC |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 44W wired 5W reverse wired | 44W wired 5W reverse wired |
| Type | 4450 mAh | 4400 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Cosmic Black, Aurora Dawn, White | Cosmic Black, Aurora Dawn, White |
| Models | V2134A, V2105 | V2133A, V2104 |
| Price | About 1040 EUR | About 520 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | Endurance rating 123h | - |
| Camera | Photo / Video | - |
| Display | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) | - |
| Loudspeaker | -27.5 LUFS (Good) | - |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 694499 (v9) GeekBench: 2956 (v5.1) GFXBench: 40fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | - |
vivo X70 Pro
- Brighter Display
- Superior Camera System
- Potentially better performance (Exynos 1080 version)
- Premium Build Quality
- Higher Price
- Potentially larger size/weight
vivo X70
- More Affordable
- Excellent Value
- Stylish Design
- Good Performance
- Less Bright Display
- Less Versatile Camera
- Potentially less premium materials
Display Comparison
The vivo X70 Pro takes a significant lead in the display department. It boasts a measured peak brightness of 993 nits, offering vastly improved visibility in direct sunlight compared to the X70. Both phones feature excellent contrast ratios (approaching infinity), and vibrant AMOLED panels, but the Pro's brightness advantage is undeniable. Both likely use a 120Hz refresh rate for smooth scrolling.
Camera Comparison
The camera is where the X70 Pro truly shines. While both phones feature excellent camera systems, the Pro typically includes a larger primary sensor (likely a 50MP GN1), offering improved low-light performance and dynamic range. The Pro also often includes additional telephoto lenses for greater zoom capabilities. The X70's camera is still very capable, but the Pro offers a more versatile and higher-quality photography experience. Region-specific differences in the X70 Pro's chipset (Dimensity 1200 vs Exynos 1080) can impact image processing.
Performance
Both devices are powered by the Mediatek Dimensity 1200 chipset, ensuring smooth performance for everyday tasks and moderate gaming. The X70 Pro, in the Chinese market, utilizes the Exynos 1080, which offers a slight performance edge over the Dimensity 1200. However, for most users, the difference will be negligible. Both phones have 8GB of RAM, ensuring multitasking is handled efficiently.
Battery Life
Both phones offer impressive battery life, with an endurance rating of 123 hours. Charging speeds are identical at 44W wired and 5W reverse wired, ensuring quick top-ups and the ability to charge other devices.
Buying Guide
Who should buy the vivo X70 Pro? Users prioritizing a top-tier camera experience, a brighter display for outdoor visibility, and a slightly more premium feel. Who should buy the vivo X70? Budget-conscious buyers who still want a stylish vivo phone with good performance and a capable camera.