vivo X70 Pro vs vivo X60 Pro: A Detailed Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The vivo X70 Pro edges out the X60 Pro thanks to its significantly brighter display, improved chipset (especially the international version), and substantially longer battery life. While the X60 Pro still offers a great experience, the X70 Pro represents a worthwhile upgrade for most users.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo X70 Pro | vivo X60 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 9, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41 - International | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 28, 40, 41, 78, 79 SA/NSA - International | 1, 3, 7, 28, 40, 41, 78 SA/NSA - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| 3, 5, 77, 78 SA/NSA - India | 1, 3, 28, 38, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA - China | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, September 09 | 2021, March 22 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, September 17 | Available. Released 2021, April 02 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Schott Xensation Up), glass back, aluminum frame | Glass front (Schott Xensation Up), glass back, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 158.3 x 73.2 x 8 mm (6.23 x 2.88 x 0.31 in) | 158.6 x 73.2 x 7.6 mm (6.24 x 2.88 x 0.30 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 183/184/185/186 g (6.46 oz) | 179 g (6.31 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Schott Xensation Up | Schott Xensation Up |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2376 pixels (~398 ppi density) | 1080 x 2376 pixels (~398 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.56 inches, 104.6 cm2 (~90.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.56 inches, 104.6 cm2 (~90.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1300 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+ |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) - InternationalOcta-core (1x2.8 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) - China | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Kryo 585 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 585 & 4x1.80 GHz Kryo 585) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 1200 (6 nm) - InternationalExynos 1080 (5 nm) - China | Qualcomm SM8250-AC Snapdragon 870 5G (7 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 - InternationalMali-G78 MP10 - China | Adreno 650 |
| OS | Android 11, upgradable to Android 14, Funtouch OS 14 (International), OriginOS (China) | Android 11, Funtouch 11.1 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, Zeiss optics, Zeiss T* lens coating, Pixel Shift, dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | Zeiss optics, color spectrum sensor, Pixel Shift, LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, gimbal OIS 8 MP, f/3.4, 125mm (periscope telephoto), 1/4.4", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS, 5x optical zoom 12 MP, f/2.0, 50mm (telephoto), 1/2.93", 1.22µm, PDAF, 2x optical zoom 12 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 116˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.1", 1.12µm, AF | 48 MP, f/1.5, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF, gimbal OIS 13 MP, f/2.5, 50mm (telephoto), 1/2.8", 0.8µm, PDAF, 2x optical zoom 13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚, 16mm (ultrawide) |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.5, 24mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | - |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS, HDR10+ | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.5, 24mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | 32 MP, f/2.5, 24mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| 32-bit/192kHz audio | 32-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS, NavIC | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS, NavIC |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| - | Virtual proximity sensing | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 44W wired 5W reverse wired | 33W wired |
| Type | 4450 mAh | 4200 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Cosmic Black, Aurora Dawn, White | Midnight Black, Shimmer Blue |
| Models | V2134A, V2105 | V2046 |
| Price | About 1040 EUR | About 570 EUR |
| SAR | - | 0.53 W/kg (head) 0.81 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | Endurance rating 123h | Endurance rating 91h |
| Camera | Photo / Video | Photo / Video |
| Display | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | -27.5 LUFS (Good) | -27.6 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 694499 (v9) GeekBench: 2956 (v5.1) GFXBench: 40fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | AnTuTu: 734811 (v8) GeekBench: 3749 (v5.1) GFXBench: 62fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo X70 Pro
- Brighter Display
- Longer Battery Life
- More Powerful Chipset (International Version)
- Gimbal Stabilization (often)
- Sleek Design
- Potentially Higher Price
- Chipset Variation by Region
vivo X60 Pro
- More Affordable
- Capable Camera
- Solid Performance
- Compact Size (generally)
- Less Bright Display
- Shorter Battery Life
- Older Chipset
Display Comparison
The vivo X70 Pro boasts a significantly brighter display, measuring 993 nits peak brightness compared to the X60 Pro's 818 nits. Both offer excellent contrast ratios (Infinite, nominally), but the X70 Pro's higher brightness makes it more usable outdoors and provides a more immersive viewing experience. Color accuracy is generally excellent on both.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature excellent camera systems, but the X70 Pro generally offers slightly better image quality, particularly in low light. The X70 Pro's camera system often includes gimbal stabilization, providing smoother video recording. Both phones excel in portrait mode and offer a variety of shooting modes.
Performance
The X70 Pro's chipset varies by region. The international version utilizes the Mediatek Dimensity 1200, while the Chinese version features the Exynos 1080. Both are improvements over the X60 Pro's Snapdragon 870. While the Snapdragon 870 is still a capable chip, the Dimensity 1200 and Exynos 1080 offer better raw processing power and efficiency. Expect smoother multitasking and faster app loading times on the X70 Pro.
Battery Life
Battery life is a major differentiator. The X70 Pro delivers an impressive endurance rating of 123 hours, significantly outperforming the X60 Pro's 91 hours. This translates to noticeably longer usage between charges, making the X70 Pro a better choice for heavy users.
Buying Guide
Who should buy the vivo X70 Pro? Users prioritizing a vibrant display, extended battery life, and the latest processor will appreciate the X70 Pro. Who should buy the vivo X60 Pro? Those seeking a more budget-friendly option with solid performance and a capable camera, and who don't need the absolute best battery or display, might find the X60 Pro a compelling choice.