vivo X70 Pro vs vivo V27 Pro: A Detailed Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The vivo V27 Pro emerges as the stronger contender thanks to its significantly faster Dimensity 8200 chipset, faster charging, and a slightly brighter display. While the X70 Pro boasts a potentially superior camera system (depending on specific lens configurations), the V27 Pro offers a more modern and overall improved experience.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo X70 Pro | vivo V27 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 9, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41 - International | 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 28, 40, 41, 78, 79 SA/NSA - International | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| 3, 5, 77, 78 SA/NSA - India | - | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, September 09 | 2023, March 01 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, September 17 | Available. Released 2023, March 01 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Schott Xensation Up), glass back, aluminum frame | Glass front, plastic frame, glass back |
| Dimensions | 158.3 x 73.2 x 8 mm (6.23 x 2.88 x 0.31 in) | 164.1 x 74.8 x 7.4 mm (6.46 x 2.94 x 0.29 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 183/184/185/186 g (6.46 oz) | 182 g (6.42 oz) |
| - | Color changing back panel color | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Schott Xensation Up | - |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2376 pixels (~398 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~388 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.56 inches, 104.6 cm2 (~90.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.78 inches, 111.0 cm2 (~90.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1300 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+ |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) - InternationalOcta-core (1x2.8 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) - China | Octa-core (1x3.1 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 1200 (6 nm) - InternationalExynos 1080 (5 nm) - China | Mediatek Dimensity 8200 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 - InternationalMali-G78 MP10 - China | Mali-G610 MC6 |
| OS | Android 11, upgradable to Android 14, Funtouch OS 14 (International), OriginOS (China) | Android 13, Funtouch 13 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, Zeiss optics, Zeiss T* lens coating, Pixel Shift, dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | Ring-LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Quad | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, gimbal OIS 8 MP, f/3.4, 125mm (periscope telephoto), 1/4.4", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS, 5x optical zoom 12 MP, f/2.0, 50mm (telephoto), 1/2.93", 1.22µm, PDAF, 2x optical zoom 12 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 116˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.1", 1.12µm, AF | - |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.5, 24mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | 50 MP, f/2.5, (wide), AF |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS, HDR10+ | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | Dual-LED flash, HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.5, 24mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | 50 MP, f/2.5, (wide), AF |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| 32-bit/192kHz audio | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS, NavIC | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, NavIC |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 44W wired 5W reverse wired | 66W wired, 50% in 19 min, 72% in 30 min |
| Type | 4450 mAh | 4600 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Cosmic Black, Aurora Dawn, White | Magic Blue, Noble Black |
| Models | V2134A, V2105 | V2230 |
| Price | About 1040 EUR | About 440 EUR |
| SAR | - | 1.22 W/kg (head) 0.89 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | Endurance rating 123h | Endurance rating 121h |
| Camera | Photo / Video | Photo / Video |
| Display | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | -27.5 LUFS (Good) | -29.1 LUFS (Average) |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 694499 (v9) GeekBench: 2956 (v5.1) GFXBench: 40fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | AnTuTu: 846767 (v9) GeekBench: 3933 (v5.1), 3421 (v6) GFXBench: 57fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo X70 Pro
- Potentially superior camera (gimbal stabilization)
- Mature design
- Good battery life
- Older chipset
- Slower charging
- Potentially lower refresh rate display
vivo V27 Pro
- Faster Dimensity 8200 chipset
- Faster 66W charging
- Slightly brighter display
- Likely 120Hz refresh rate
- Camera may not be as refined as X70 Pro
- Design might be considered less premium by some
Display Comparison
Both phones feature excellent displays with infinite contrast ratios. The V27 Pro edges out the X70 Pro with a slightly higher peak brightness of 978 nits versus 993 nits (though the difference is minimal). Both offer vibrant colors and good viewing angles. The V27 Pro may also have a more modern refresh rate (likely 120Hz) compared to the X70 Pro (potentially 60Hz or 90Hz).
Camera Comparison
The X70 Pro was known for its impressive camera system, particularly its gimbal stabilization. While the V27 Pro also has a capable camera, the X70 Pro's image processing and low-light performance might be slightly better, especially with the right lens configuration. Both phones likely offer versatile camera setups with wide, ultrawide, and telephoto lenses.
Performance
The Dimensity 8200 in the V27 Pro is a substantial upgrade over the Dimensity 1200 (or Exynos 1080) in the X70 Pro. Expect noticeably faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and better gaming performance on the V27 Pro. The CPU differences further solidify this advantage.
Battery Life
Battery life is remarkably similar, with both phones achieving an endurance rating of around 121-123 hours. However, the V27 Pro's 66W charging is significantly faster than the X70 Pro's 44W, allowing for quicker top-ups.
Buying Guide
Who should buy the vivo X70 Pro? Users prioritizing camera quality and a slightly more mature design might find the X70 Pro appealing, especially if they can find it at a discounted price. Who should buy the vivo V27 Pro? Those seeking a powerful processor for gaming and everyday tasks, faster charging, and a vibrant display will benefit from the V27 Pro's advancements.