vivo X70 Pro vs vivo V27: A Detailed Comparison
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The vivo V27 emerges as the stronger contender, offering a brighter display, faster charging, and a more modern chipset. While the X70 Pro boasts a slightly more established camera reputation, the V27’s improvements in other areas make it a compelling choice for most users.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo X70 Pro | vivo V27 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - International |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 9, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41 - International | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 28, 40, 41, 78, 79 SA/NSA - International | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| 3, 5, 77, 78 SA/NSA - India | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 78 SA/NSA - Asia | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, September 09 | 2023, March 01 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, September 17 | Available. Released 2023, March 01 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Schott Xensation Up), glass back, aluminum frame | Glass front, glass back |
| Dimensions | 158.3 x 73.2 x 8 mm (6.23 x 2.88 x 0.31 in) | 164.1 x 74.8 x 7.4 mm (6.46 x 2.94 x 0.29 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 183/184/185/186 g (6.46 oz) | 180 g (6.35 oz) |
| - | Color changing back panel color | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Schott Xensation Up | - |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2376 pixels (~398 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~388 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.56 inches, 104.6 cm2 (~90.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.78 inches, 111.0 cm2 (~90.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1300 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+ |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) - InternationalOcta-core (1x2.8 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) - China | Octa-core (2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 & 6x Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 1200 (6 nm) - InternationalExynos 1080 (5 nm) - China | Mediatek Dimensity 7200 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 - InternationalMali-G78 MP10 - China | Mali-G610 MC4 |
| OS | Android 11, upgradable to Android 14, Funtouch OS 14 (International), OriginOS (China) | Android 13, Funtouch 13 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | - | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, Zeiss optics, Zeiss T* lens coating, Pixel Shift, dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | Ring-LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Quad | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, gimbal OIS 8 MP, f/3.4, 125mm (periscope telephoto), 1/4.4", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS, 5x optical zoom 12 MP, f/2.0, 50mm (telephoto), 1/2.93", 1.22µm, PDAF, 2x optical zoom 12 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 116˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.1", 1.12µm, AF | - |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.5, 24mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | 50 MP, f/2.5, (wide), AF |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS, HDR10+ | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | Dual-LED flash, HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.5, 24mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | 50 MP, f/2.5, (wide), AF |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| 32-bit/192kHz audio | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS, NavIC | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 44W wired 5W reverse wired | 66W wired, 50% in 19 min |
| Type | 4450 mAh | 4600 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Cosmic Black, Aurora Dawn, White | Magic Blue, Noble Black, Emerald Green, Flowing Gold |
| Models | V2134A, V2105 | V2231, V2246 |
| Price | About 1040 EUR | About 380 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | Endurance rating 123h | Endurance rating 134h |
| Camera | Photo / Video | Photo / Video |
| Display | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | -27.5 LUFS (Good) | -28.2 LUFS (Average) |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 694499 (v9) GeekBench: 2956 (v5.1) GFXBench: 40fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | AnTuTu: 613641 (v9) GeekBench: 2400 (v5.1), 2689 (v6) GFXBench: 34fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo X70 Pro
- Potentially slightly better camera (historical reputation)
- Premium build quality
- Established brand recognition
- Older chipset
- Slower charging
- Lower peak brightness
vivo V27
- Brighter display
- Faster charging (66W)
- More modern chipset (Dimensity 7200)
- Improved battery endurance
- Camera performance may not be as consistently excellent as the X70 Pro (needs testing)
Display Comparison
The vivo V27 takes a clear lead in the display department. It boasts a measured peak brightness of 1055 nits compared to the X70 Pro's 993 nits. Both offer excellent contrast ratios (Infinite nominal), but the V27's higher brightness will be noticeable in outdoor conditions. Both likely use AMOLED panels with vibrant colors and deep blacks.
Camera Comparison
The X70 Pro historically had a reputation for excellent camera performance, particularly in low light. However, the V27's camera system is likely competitive, with advancements in vivo's image processing. Both phones offer versatile camera setups, including main, ultrawide, and potentially macro lenses. Detailed camera comparisons would require extensive testing, but initial impressions suggest the V27 holds its own.
Performance
The vivo V27's Dimensity 7200 (4nm) is a significant upgrade over the X70 Pro's Dimensity 1200 (6nm) or Exynos 1080 (5nm). The newer chipset offers improved efficiency and performance, particularly in graphics-intensive tasks. While both have octa-core CPUs, the V27's Cortex-A715 cores provide a noticeable boost in speed. Expect smoother multitasking and gaming on the V27.
Battery Life
The vivo V27 edges out the X70 Pro in battery endurance, with an endurance rating of 134h compared to 123h. The V27 also features significantly faster charging at 66W (50% in 19 minutes) versus the X70 Pro's 44W. This means quicker top-ups and less time tethered to a charger.
Buying Guide
Who should buy the vivo X70 Pro? Users prioritizing a potentially slightly better camera experience and don't mind an older chipset. Who should buy the vivo V27? Those seeking a brighter display, faster charging, and a more recent processor at a potentially lower price point.