vivo X70 Pro vs vivo V25 Pro: A Detailed Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The vivo V25 Pro emerges as the stronger contender, primarily due to its significantly faster charging and a more modern chipset. While the X70 Pro boasts a slightly brighter display and potentially better camera image processing, the V25 Pro's overall package offers better value and performance for most users.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo X70 Pro | vivo V25 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 9, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41 - International | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 8, 18, 19, 26, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 28, 40, 41, 78, 79 SA/NSA - International | 1, 3, 5, 8, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| 3, 5, 77, 78 SA/NSA - India | - | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, September 09 | 2022, August 17 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, September 17 | Available. Released 2022, August 25 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Schott Xensation Up), glass back, aluminum frame | Glass front, glass back |
| Dimensions | 158.3 x 73.2 x 8 mm (6.23 x 2.88 x 0.31 in) | 158.9 x 73.5 x 8.6 mm (6.26 x 2.89 x 0.34 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 183/184/185/186 g (6.46 oz) | 190 g (6.70 oz) |
| - | Color changing back panel color Resistant to drops, scratches, and sweat | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Schott Xensation Up | - |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2376 pixels (~398 ppi density) | 1080 x 2376 pixels (~398 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.56 inches, 104.6 cm2 (~90.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.56 inches, 104.6 cm2 (~89.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1300 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1300 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) - InternationalOcta-core (1x2.8 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) - China | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 1200 (6 nm) - InternationalExynos 1080 (5 nm) - China | Mediatek Dimensity 1300 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 - InternationalMali-G78 MP10 - China | Mali-G77 MC9 |
| OS | Android 11, upgradable to Android 14, Funtouch OS 14 (International), OriginOS (China) | Android 12, Funtouch 12 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, Zeiss optics, Zeiss T* lens coating, Pixel Shift, dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, gimbal OIS 8 MP, f/3.4, 125mm (periscope telephoto), 1/4.4", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS, 5x optical zoom 12 MP, f/2.0, 50mm (telephoto), 1/2.93", 1.22µm, PDAF, 2x optical zoom 12 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 116˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.1", 1.12µm, AF | - |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.5, 24mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | 32 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm, AF |
| Triple | - | 64 MP, f/1.9, 25mm (wide), 1/1.72", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS, HDR10+ | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.5, 24mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | 32 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm, AF |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| 32-bit/192kHz audio | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | No |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS, NavIC | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS, NavIC |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 44W wired 5W reverse wired | 66W wired, 40% in 15 min, 71% in 30 min |
| Type | 4450 mAh | 4830 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Cosmic Black, Aurora Dawn, White | Pure Black, Sailing Blue |
| Models | V2134A, V2105 | V2158 |
| Price | About 1040 EUR | About 440 EUR |
| SAR | - | 1.19 W/kg (head) 0.88 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | Endurance rating 123h | Endurance rating 101h |
| Camera | Photo / Video | Photo / Video |
| Display | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | -27.5 LUFS (Good) | -27.3 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 694499 (v9) GeekBench: 2956 (v5.1) GFXBench: 40fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | AnTuTu: 704090 (v9) GeekBench: 2521 (v5.1) GFXBench: 42fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo X70 Pro
- Slightly brighter display
- Potentially better camera image processing
- Excellent gimbal stabilization
- Good battery life (endurance rating)
- Slower charging speed
- Older chipset
- May lack latest software features
vivo V25 Pro
- Faster charging (66W)
- More modern chipset (Dimensity 1300)
- Competitive camera system
- Good value for money
- Slightly dimmer display
- Potentially less refined camera processing compared to X70 Pro
Display Comparison
The vivo X70 Pro takes a slight lead in display brightness, measuring 993 nits compared to the V25 Pro's 805 nits. Both feature excellent contrast ratios (Infinite nominal), offering vibrant colors and deep blacks. However, the V25 Pro's display might be more color accurate out of the box, depending on calibration.
Camera Comparison
Both phones offer versatile camera systems. The X70 Pro is known for its excellent image processing and gimbal stabilization, potentially resulting in superior low-light performance and video stabilization. The V25 Pro's camera hardware is competitive, but the X70 Pro's software optimization might give it an edge in certain scenarios. Both offer excellent photo and video capabilities.
Performance
The vivo V25 Pro's Mediatek Dimensity 1300 offers a noticeable performance boost over the X70 Pro's Dimensity 1200 (or Exynos 1080 in China). While both utilize the same CPU core configuration, the Dimensity 1300's architecture and manufacturing process provide better efficiency and raw power. Expect smoother multitasking and better gaming performance on the V25 Pro.
Battery Life
The X70 Pro holds a slight advantage in endurance rating (123h vs 101h), suggesting slightly better overall battery life under typical usage. However, the V25 Pro's 66W charging is a game-changer, allowing for a 40% charge in just 15 minutes and 71% in 30 minutes – a significant improvement over the X70 Pro's 44W charging.
Buying Guide
Who should buy the vivo X70 Pro? Users prioritizing a slightly brighter display and potentially more refined camera processing, and who don't mind slower charging. Who should buy the vivo V25 Pro? Those seeking a balance of premium features, fast charging, and a modern chipset at a competitive price.