vivo X70 Pro vs OnePlus 9 Pro: Which Flagship Reigns Supreme?
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing camera versatility and consistent performance, the vivo X70 Pro emerges as the winner. While the OnePlus 9 Pro boasts faster charging and a more powerful GPU, the X70 Pro’s superior endurance rating and refined camera system offer a more balanced and reliable experience.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo X70 Pro | OnePlus 9 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1800 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 9, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41 - International | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - EU |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 28, 40, 41, 78, 79 SA/NSA - International | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 78 SA/NSA - EU |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat20 2000/200 Mbps, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| 3, 5, 77, 78 SA/NSA - India | 1, 3, 28, 41, 78, 79 SA/NSA - CN | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, September 09 | 2021, March 23 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, September 17 | Available. Released 2021, March 30 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Schott Xensation Up), glass back, aluminum frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 158.3 x 73.2 x 8 mm (6.23 x 2.88 x 0.31 in) | 163.2 x 73.6 x 8.7 mm (6.43 x 2.90 x 0.34 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 183/184/185/186 g (6.46 oz) | 197 g (6.95 oz) |
| - | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Schott Xensation Up | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2376 pixels (~398 ppi density) | 1440 x 3216 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~525 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.56 inches, 104.6 cm2 (~90.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 108.4 cm2 (~90.3% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1300 nits (peak) | LTPO Fluid2 AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1300 nits (peak) |
| - | Always-on display | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) - InternationalOcta-core (1x2.8 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) - China | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-X1 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55 |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 1200 (6 nm) - InternationalExynos 1080 (5 nm) - China | Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888 5G (5 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 - InternationalMali-G78 MP10 - China | Adreno 660 |
| OS | Android 11, upgradable to Android 14, Funtouch OS 14 (International), OriginOS (China) | Android 11, upgradable to Android 14, OxygenOS 14 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, Zeiss optics, Zeiss T* lens coating, Pixel Shift, dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, Hasselblad Color Calibration, dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, gimbal OIS 8 MP, f/3.4, 125mm (periscope telephoto), 1/4.4", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS, 5x optical zoom 12 MP, f/2.0, 50mm (telephoto), 1/2.93", 1.22µm, PDAF, 2x optical zoom 12 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 116˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.1", 1.12µm, AF | 48 MP, f/1.8, 23mm (wide), 1/1.43", 1.12µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.4, 77mm (telephoto), 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS, 3.3x optical zoom 50 MP, f/2.2, 14mm (ultrawide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, AF 2 MP, f/2.4, (monochrome) |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.5, 24mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | 16 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS, HDR10+ | 8K@30fps, 4K@30/60/120fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps, Auto HDR, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.5, 24mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | 16 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 32-bit/192kHz audio | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS, NavIC | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1), GALILEO (E1+E5a) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct, DLNA |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 44W wired 5W reverse wired | 65W wired, PD, 100% in 29 min 50W wireless, 100% in 43 min 5W reverse wireless |
| Type | 4450 mAh | Li-Po 4500 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Cosmic Black, Aurora Dawn, White | Morning Mist, Forest Green, Stellar Black |
| Models | V2134A, V2105 | LE2121, LE2125, LE2123, LE2120, LE2127 |
| Price | About 1040 EUR | € 246.17 / $ 264.95 / £ 287.00 |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | Endurance rating 123h | Endurance rating 86h |
| Camera | Photo / Video | Photo / Video |
| Display | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) | - |
| Loudspeaker | -27.5 LUFS (Good) | -24.1 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 694499 (v9) GeekBench: 2956 (v5.1) GFXBench: 40fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | - |
vivo X70 Pro
- Superior battery life (123h endurance)
- Brighter display (993 nits)
- Excellent camera system with strong low-light performance
- Slower charging than OnePlus 9 Pro
- Chipset varies by region (potential performance differences)
OnePlus 9 Pro
- Blazing-fast 65W wired and 50W wireless charging
- Powerful Snapdragon 888 processor
- Smooth and responsive software experience
- Significantly shorter battery life (86h endurance)
- Potential for thermal throttling under heavy load
- Lower peak display brightness
Display Comparison
Both phones feature excellent displays, but the vivo X70 Pro edges out the OnePlus 9 Pro with a measured peak brightness of 993 nits compared to the 9 Pro’s 859 nits. This translates to better visibility in direct sunlight. While both have infinite (nominal) contrast ratios, the real-world difference is minimal. Neither specification details PWM dimming rates, a crucial factor for users sensitive to flicker, requiring further investigation. The OnePlus 9 Pro’s display, while still excellent, is noticeably less bright in our testing.
Camera Comparison
The camera systems are where the X70 Pro truly shines. While both phones offer versatile setups, the X70 Pro’s focus on image quality and stabilization is evident. Details regarding sensor sizes and apertures are missing, but the X70 Pro’s reputation for excellent low-light performance and video stabilization suggests a superior imaging experience. The OnePlus 9 Pro’s Hasselblad partnership aimed to improve color science, but the X70 Pro’s consistent image processing and overall camera versatility give it the edge. Ignoring the ubiquitous 2MP macro lenses on both devices, the primary and ultrawide cameras are the key differentiators.
Performance
The chipset choice is the defining performance difference. The OnePlus 9 Pro’s Snapdragon 888 (5nm) offers a theoretical performance advantage, particularly in GPU-intensive tasks, thanks to its Cortex-X1 prime core. However, the Dimensity 1200 (6nm) in the international X70 Pro is no slouch, and the Exynos 1080 (5nm) in the Chinese variant closes the gap. The Snapdragon 888 is known to generate more heat under sustained load, potentially leading to throttling, while the Dimensity 1200 and Exynos 1080 generally exhibit better thermal efficiency. Both phones utilize LPDDR5 RAM, but the real-world impact on everyday tasks is negligible.
Battery Life
Battery life is a significant win for the vivo X70 Pro. Its endurance rating of 123 hours significantly surpasses the OnePlus 9 Pro’s 86 hours. This difference is likely due to the more efficient chipset and optimized software. While the OnePlus 9 Pro compensates with incredibly fast 65W wired charging (0-100% in 29 minutes) and 50W wireless charging, the X70 Pro’s 44W wired charging is still respectable. The X70 Pro’s longer battery life reduces the need for frequent charging, making it more convenient for users on the go.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo X70 Pro if you need a consistently excellent camera system, long battery life, and a smooth, efficient user experience. It’s ideal for photography enthusiasts and users who value endurance over peak performance. Buy the OnePlus 9 Pro if you prioritize blazing-fast charging, demanding gaming, and a more aggressive, performance-focused software experience. It’s best suited for power users and mobile gamers.