vivo X70 Pro vs Google Pixel 6 Pro: Which Flagship Android Phone Wins?
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the vivo X70 Pro offers a more consistently polished experience. Its brighter display, faster charging, and longer battery endurance, coupled with a versatile camera system, make it the more practical choice. However, the Pixel 6 Pro’s unique software features and computational photography prowess appeal to a specific user base.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo X70 Pro | Google Pixel 6 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 9, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41 - International | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 46, 48, 66, 71 - GLUOG, G8VOU |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 28, 40, 41, 78, 79 SA/NSA - International | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 14, 20, 25, 28, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71, 77, 78, 257, 258, 260, 261 SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave - G8VOU |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| 3, 5, 77, 78 SA/NSA - India | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 14, 20, 25, 28, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - GLUOG | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, September 09 | 2021, October 19 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, September 17 | Available. Released 2021, October 28 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Schott Xensation Up), glass back, aluminum frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), glass back (Gorilla Glass Victus), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 158.3 x 73.2 x 8 mm (6.23 x 2.88 x 0.31 in) | 163.9 x 75.9 x 8.9 mm (6.45 x 2.99 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM |
| Weight | 183/184/185/186 g (6.46 oz) | 210 g (7.41 oz) |
| - | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Schott Xensation Up | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2376 pixels (~398 ppi density) | 1440 x 3120 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~512 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.56 inches, 104.6 cm2 (~90.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 110.6 cm2 (~88.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1300 nits (peak) | LTPO AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+ |
| - | Always-on display | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) - InternationalOcta-core (1x2.8 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) - China | Octa-core (2x2.80 GHz Cortex-X1 & 2x2.25 GHz Cortex-A76 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 1200 (6 nm) - InternationalExynos 1080 (5 nm) - China | Google Tensor (5 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 - InternationalMali-G78 MP10 - China | Mali-G78 MP20 |
| OS | Android 11, upgradable to Android 14, Funtouch OS 14 (International), OriginOS (China) | Android 12, upgradable to Android 15, up to 5 major Android upgrades |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, Zeiss optics, Zeiss T* lens coating, Pixel Shift, dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | Laser AF, Dual-LED flash, Pixel Shift, Auto-HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, gimbal OIS 8 MP, f/3.4, 125mm (periscope telephoto), 1/4.4", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS, 5x optical zoom 12 MP, f/2.0, 50mm (telephoto), 1/2.93", 1.22µm, PDAF, 2x optical zoom 12 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 116˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.1", 1.12µm, AF | - |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.5, 24mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | 11.1 MP, f/2.2, 20mm (ultrawide), 1.22µm |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.9, 25mm (wide), 1/1.31", 1.2µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 48 MP, f/3.5, 104mm (periscope telephoto), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS, 4x optical zoom 12 MP, f/2.2, 17mm, 114˚ (ultrawide), 1.25µm |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS, HDR10+ | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps; gyro-EIS, OIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.5, 24mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | 11.1 MP, f/2.2, 20mm (ultrawide), 1.22µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 32-bit/192kHz audio | - | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS, NavIC | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.1 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| - | Ultra Wideband (UWB) support | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 44W wired 5W reverse wired | 23W wired, PD3.0, 50% in 30 min 23W wireless Reverse wireless |
| Type | 4450 mAh | Li-Ion 5003 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Cosmic Black, Aurora Dawn, White | Cloudy White, Sorta Sunny, Stormy Black |
| Models | V2134A, V2105 | GLUOG, G8VOU, GF5KQ |
| Price | About 1040 EUR | € 199.99 / $ 204.99 / £ 275.00 / ₹ 29,699 |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | Endurance rating 123h | Endurance rating 84h |
| Camera | Photo / Video | - |
| Display | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | -27.5 LUFS (Good) | - |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 694499 (v9) GeekBench: 2956 (v5.1) GFXBench: 40fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | AnTuTu: 585485 (v8), 719815 (v9) GeekBench: 2831 (v5.1) GFXBench: 39 fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo X70 Pro
- Superior battery life (123h endurance)
- Faster 44W wired charging
- Brighter display for outdoor visibility
- Software experience may not appeal to all
- Reverse wireless charging not supported
Google Pixel 6 Pro
- Unique Google Tensor chip with AI capabilities
- Exceptional computational photography
- Clean and streamlined Android experience
- Significantly shorter battery life (84h endurance)
- Slower 23W charging speeds
- Potential for thermal throttling
Display Comparison
The vivo X70 Pro boasts a brighter display, reaching a measured 993 nits compared to the Pixel 6 Pro’s 846 nits. This translates to better visibility under direct sunlight. Both displays share an 'infinite' contrast ratio, typical of OLED panels, but the X70 Pro’s higher peak brightness provides a more impactful HDR experience. While both offer smooth scrolling, neither specification details refresh rate, so a deeper dive into panel technology would be needed to determine which offers a more fluid visual experience. Bezels appear comparable based on available imagery, and color accuracy is likely excellent on both, though independent calibration data is absent.
Camera Comparison
Both phones are camera-focused, but approach image processing differently. The X70 Pro’s camera system is known for its versatility, offering a range of lenses and a focus on natural color reproduction. The Pixel 6 Pro leverages Google’s computational photography expertise, delivering impressive dynamic range and detail, particularly in challenging lighting conditions. While specific sensor sizes aren’t provided, the Pixel 6 Pro’s image processing is heavily reliant on software algorithms, while the X70 Pro likely leans more on optical quality. The absence of details regarding OIS and lens apertures makes a definitive comparison difficult, but the Pixel 6 Pro’s 'Magic Eraser' and other AI-powered features are unique selling points.
Performance
The chipset choice is a key differentiator. The vivo X70 Pro utilizes the Mediatek Dimensity 1200 (international) or Exynos 1080 (China), both 6nm/5nm chips respectively. The Google Pixel 6 Pro features Google’s in-house Tensor chip, also built on a 5nm process. While the Tensor chip excels in AI and machine learning tasks, the Dimensity 1200 and Exynos 1080 offer strong raw CPU performance, with the China variant having a slightly higher clock speed (2.8GHz vs 3.0GHz). The Pixel 6 Pro’s Cortex-X1 cores offer a performance advantage in specific workloads, but the X70 Pro’s more traditional core configuration may prove more consistent across a wider range of applications. Thermal management is a potential concern for the Pixel 6 Pro, as the Tensor chip has been reported to run warm under sustained load.
Battery Life
Battery life is a clear win for the vivo X70 Pro. Its endurance rating of 123 hours significantly surpasses the Pixel 6 Pro’s 84 hours. This difference is likely due to a combination of factors, including the more efficient Dimensity 1200 chipset and potentially a larger battery capacity (not specified in the data). The X70 Pro also supports faster 44W wired charging, compared to the Pixel 6 Pro’s 23W wired and 23W wireless charging. The Pixel 6 Pro does offer reverse wireless charging, a feature absent on the X70 Pro, but the slower charging speeds mean topping up the battery takes considerably longer.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo X70 Pro if you need a phone with exceptional battery life, a consistently bright and vibrant display, and fast 44W charging. It’s ideal for users who prioritize a reliable all-rounder with a strong camera system. Buy the Google Pixel 6 Pro if you prefer a clean, Google-centric software experience, cutting-edge computational photography features, and don’t mind trade-offs in battery life and charging speed.