Asus ROG Phone 5s vs. vivo X70 Pro: A Deep Dive into Gaming and Photography
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For dedicated mobile gamers, the Asus ROG Phone 5s is the clear winner, offering a superior chipset and optimized cooling. However, the vivo X70 Pro excels in photography and provides a more refined, all-around smartphone experience, making it the better choice for content creators and general users.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo X70 Pro | Asus ROG Phone 5s |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1800 / 1900 / 2100 - Version 1 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 9, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41 - International | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66, 71 - Version 1 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 28, 40, 41, 78, 79 SA/NSA - International | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 71, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA - Version 1 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (7CA) Cat20 1400/150 Mbps, 5G 4 Gbps DL |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| 3, 5, 77, 78 SA/NSA - India | 2, 3, 5, 7, 12, 20, 25, 28, 38, 40, 66, 71, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA - Version 4 | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, September 09 | 2021, August 16 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, September 17 | Available. Released 2021, August 26 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Schott Xensation Up), glass back, aluminum frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), glass back (Gorilla Glass 3), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 158.3 x 73.2 x 8 mm (6.23 x 2.88 x 0.31 in) | 172.8 x 77.3 x 9.9 mm (6.80 x 3.04 x 0.39 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 183/184/185/186 g (6.46 oz) | 238 g (8.40 oz) |
| - | RGB light panel (on the back) Pressure sensitive zones (Gaming triggers) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Schott Xensation Up | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2376 pixels (~398 ppi density) | 1080 x 2448 pixels (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.56 inches, 104.6 cm2 (~90.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.78 inches, 109.5 cm2 (~82.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1300 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, HDR10+, 800 nits (typ), 1200 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) - InternationalOcta-core (1x2.8 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) - China | Octa-core (1x2.99 GHz Cortex-X1 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 1200 (6 nm) - InternationalExynos 1080 (5 nm) - China | Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888+ 5G (5 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 - InternationalMali-G78 MP10 - China | Adreno 660 |
| OS | Android 11, upgradable to Android 14, Funtouch OS 14 (International), OriginOS (China) | Android 11, upgradable to Android 13, ROG UI |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 128GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 18GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, Zeiss optics, Zeiss T* lens coating, Pixel Shift, dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, gimbal OIS 8 MP, f/3.4, 125mm (periscope telephoto), 1/4.4", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS, 5x optical zoom 12 MP, f/2.0, 50mm (telephoto), 1/2.93", 1.22µm, PDAF, 2x optical zoom 12 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 116˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.1", 1.12µm, AF | - |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.5, 24mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | - |
| Triple | - | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.73", 0.8µm, PDAF 13 MP, f/2.4, 11mm, 125˚ (ultrawide) 5 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS, HDR10+ | 8K@30fps, 4K@30/60/120fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, 720p@480fps; gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | Panorama, HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.5, 24mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | 24 MP, f/2.5, 27mm (wide), 0.9µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | Yes |
| 35mm jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers (2 amplifiers) |
| 32-bit/192kHz audio | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS, NavIC | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.1 (side), USB Type-C 2.0 (bottom), OTG, accessory connector |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 44W wired 5W reverse wired | 65W wired, PD3.0, QC5, 70% in 30 min, 100% in 52 min 10W reverse wired |
| Type | 4450 mAh | Li-Po 6000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Cosmic Black, Aurora Dawn, White | Phantom Black, Storm White |
| Models | V2134A, V2105 | ZS676KS |
| Price | About 1040 EUR | About 1030 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | Endurance rating 123h | - |
| Camera | Photo / Video | - |
| Display | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) | - |
| Loudspeaker | -27.5 LUFS (Good) | - |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 694499 (v9) GeekBench: 2956 (v5.1) GFXBench: 40fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | - |
vivo X70 Pro
- Exceptional camera performance and image processing
- Bright and vibrant display with high peak brightness
- Balanced overall smartphone experience
- Chipset performance lags behind the ROG Phone 5s
- Slower charging speeds compared to the ROG Phone 5s
Asus ROG Phone 5s
- Superior gaming performance with Snapdragon 888+
- Faster 65W charging for quick power-ups
- Optimized thermal management for sustained gaming
- Camera performance is not a primary focus
- Design is more aggressive and less refined
Display Comparison
The vivo X70 Pro boasts a display capable of reaching 993 nits of peak brightness, ensuring excellent visibility even in direct sunlight. While the ROG Phone 5s’s display specs aren’t provided, Asus typically prioritizes high refresh rates for gaming. The X70 Pro’s infinite contrast ratio suggests a strong OLED panel, likely offering deep blacks and vibrant colors. The ROG Phone 5s, geared towards gaming, likely features a high touch sampling rate, crucial for responsiveness in fast-paced games, a feature not explicitly mentioned for the X70 Pro. The X70 Pro’s brightness advantage is significant for outdoor use.
Camera Comparison
The vivo X70 Pro is explicitly marketed for its camera capabilities, though specific sensor details are absent. Its strength lies in its photo and video processing. The ROG Phone 5s, while capable, prioritizes gaming and doesn’t emphasize camera performance to the same degree. The Dimensity 1200’s ISP in the X70 Pro is optimized for image processing, potentially offering superior dynamic range and low-light performance. Without detailed camera specs for the ROG Phone 5s, it’s difficult to make a direct comparison, but the X70 Pro is expected to deliver more refined and versatile camera results.
Performance
The Asus ROG Phone 5s leverages the Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ 5G (5nm), a chipset known for its superior GPU performance compared to the Mediatek Dimensity 1200 (6nm) found in the international version of the vivo X70 Pro. The Snapdragon 888+’s Cortex-X1 prime core, clocked at 2.99 GHz, provides a performance edge over the X70 Pro’s Cortex-A78. The China-specific X70 Pro variant with the Exynos 1080 (5nm) offers a slight improvement in process node efficiency but still falls short of the Snapdragon 888+’s overall processing power. This translates to higher frame rates and smoother gameplay on the ROG Phone 5s, particularly in demanding titles. The ROG Phone 5s’s thermal design is also likely more robust, preventing throttling during extended gaming sessions.
Battery Life
The vivo X70 Pro has an endurance rating of 123 hours, indicating respectable battery life. It supports 44W wired charging, which is adequate but slower than the ROG Phone 5s’s 65W wired charging, capable of reaching 70% in 30 minutes and 100% in 52 minutes. The ROG Phone 5s’s faster charging is a significant advantage for gamers who need to quickly top up their battery between sessions. Both phones offer 10W reverse wired charging, useful for topping up accessories.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo X70 Pro if you prioritize camera quality, a balanced user experience, and a more aesthetically pleasing design. It’s ideal for photography enthusiasts, social media users, and those who want a premium phone that excels in everyday tasks. Buy the Asus ROG Phone 5s if you demand the highest possible gaming performance, extended gaming sessions, and are willing to trade off camera capabilities and a more subtle design for raw power and gaming-centric features.