vivo X70 Pro+ vs vivo X80 Lite: A Detailed Comparison
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The vivo X70 Pro+ boasts a significantly more powerful Snapdragon 888+ chipset and likely a superior camera system. However, the X80 Lite offers exceptional battery life and a brighter display at a more accessible price point. The X70 Pro+ wins on performance, but the X80 Lite is the better value for most users.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo X70 Pro+ | vivo X80 Lite |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE-A, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA - China | - | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, September 09 | 2022, September 22 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, September 17 | Available. Released 2022, September 22 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, glass back |
| Dimensions | 164.5 x 75.2 x 8.9 mm (6.48 x 2.96 x 0.35 in) | 159.2 x 74.2 x 7.8 mm (6.27 x 2.92 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 209 g / 213 g (7.37 oz) | 186 g (6.56 oz) |
| IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) | - | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Resolution | 1440 x 3200 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~517 ppi density) | 1080 x 2404 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 111.4 cm2 (~90.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.44 inches, 100.0 cm2 (~84.7% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | LTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 1000 nits (HBM), 1500 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 90Hz, HDR10+, 1300 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X1 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888+ 5G (5 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 900 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 660 | Mali-G68 MC4 |
| OS | Android 11, Funtouch OS 12 (International), OriginOS 1.0 (China) | Android 12, Funtouch 12 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | - | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Zeiss optics, Zeiss T* lens coating, Pixel Shift, dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 50 MP, f/1.6, (wide), 1/1.31", 1.2µm, PDAF, Laser AF, OIS 8 MP, f/3.4, 125mm (periscope telephoto), 1/4.4", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS, 5x optical zoom 12 MP, f/1.6, 50mm (telephoto), 1/2.93", 1.22µm, PDAF, OIS, 2x optical zoom 48 MP, f/2.2, 14mm, 114˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, AF, gimbal OIS | - |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.5, 24mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | 50 MP, f/2.0, (wide), AF |
| Triple | - | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 8K@30fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS, HDR10+ | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.5, 24mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | 50 MP, f/2.0, (wide), AF |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, HDR |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | - | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes |
| 32-bit/192kHz audio | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, color spectrum | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| - | Color changing back panel color | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 55W wired 50W wireless Reverse wireless 5W reverse wired | 44W wired, 61% in 30 min |
| Type | Li-Po 4500 mAh, non-removable | 4500 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue, Orange | Diamond Black, Sunrise Gold |
| Models | V2145A, V2114 | V2208 |
| Price | About 720 EUR | - |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | Endurance rating 84h | Endurance rating 120h |
| Camera | Photo / Video | Photo / Video |
| Display | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | -24.8 LUFS (Very good) | -28.3 LUFS (Average) |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 837833 (v9) GeekBench: 3469 (v5.1) GFXBench: 33fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | AnTuTu: 461428 (v9) GeekBench: 2023 (v5.1) GFXBench: 21fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo X70 Pro+
- Superior Performance (Snapdragon 888+)
- Likely Better Camera Quality
- Premium Build Quality
- Faster Charging (55W wired)
- Higher Price
- Shorter Battery Life compared to X80 Lite
- Older Model
vivo X80 Lite
- Exceptional Battery Life (120h Endurance)
- Brighter Display (781 nits)
- More Affordable
- Fast Charging (44W)
- Less Powerful Chipset (Dimensity 900)
- Likely Inferior Camera Performance
- Less Premium Build
Display Comparison
The X80 Lite takes the display crown with a measured peak brightness of 781 nits, offering significantly better visibility in direct sunlight. While both have 'infinite' contrast ratios (a marketing term), the X80 Lite's brightness advantage is tangible. The X70 Pro+ display is still good, but not as bright.
Camera Comparison
While both are listed as 'Photo / Video', the X70 Pro+ is expected to have a superior camera system. The Snapdragon 888+ often pairs with advanced image processing capabilities. The X80 Lite's camera is likely competent, but won't match the flagship-level performance of the X70 Pro+.
Performance
The X70 Pro+’s Snapdragon 888+ is a clear winner here. Its Cortex-X1 core and overall architecture provide significantly faster processing speeds and smoother multitasking compared to the Dimensity 900 in the X80 Lite. Expect noticeably better gaming performance and app responsiveness on the X70 Pro+.
Battery Life
The X80 Lite shines in battery life, boasting an endurance rating of 120h, surpassing the X70 Pro+'s 84h. While both offer decent battery performance, the X80 Lite provides significantly longer usage between charges.
Buying Guide
The vivo X70 Pro+ is ideal for photography enthusiasts, gamers, and users who demand top-tier performance. The vivo X80 Lite is a great choice for those prioritizing long battery life, a vibrant display, and a more budget-friendly price tag without sacrificing essential features.