vivo X70 Pro+ vs vivo X60 Pro: A Detailed Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The vivo X70 Pro+ boasts a significantly faster Snapdragon 888+ chipset and faster charging, while the X60 Pro offers slightly better battery life and a brighter display. The X70 Pro+ is the performance king, but the X60 Pro remains a compelling value option.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo X70 Pro+ | vivo X60 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International | 1, 3, 7, 28, 40, 41, 78 SA/NSA - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE-A, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA - China | 1, 3, 28, 38, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA - China | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, September 09 | 2021, March 22 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, September 17 | Available. Released 2021, April 02 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Schott Xensation Up), glass back, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 164.5 x 75.2 x 8.9 mm (6.48 x 2.96 x 0.35 in) | 158.6 x 73.2 x 7.6 mm (6.24 x 2.88 x 0.30 in) |
| SIM | Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 209 g / 213 g (7.37 oz) | 179 g (6.31 oz) |
| IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) | - | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Schott Xensation Up |
| Resolution | 1440 x 3200 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~517 ppi density) | 1080 x 2376 pixels (~398 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 111.4 cm2 (~90.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.56 inches, 104.6 cm2 (~90.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | LTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 1000 nits (HBM), 1500 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+ |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X1 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Kryo 585 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 585 & 4x1.80 GHz Kryo 585) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888+ 5G (5 nm) | Qualcomm SM8250-AC Snapdragon 870 5G (7 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 660 | Adreno 650 |
| OS | Android 11, Funtouch OS 12 (International), OriginOS 1.0 (China) | Android 11, Funtouch 11.1 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Zeiss optics, Zeiss T* lens coating, Pixel Shift, dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | Zeiss optics, color spectrum sensor, Pixel Shift, LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 50 MP, f/1.6, (wide), 1/1.31", 1.2µm, PDAF, Laser AF, OIS 8 MP, f/3.4, 125mm (periscope telephoto), 1/4.4", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS, 5x optical zoom 12 MP, f/1.6, 50mm (telephoto), 1/2.93", 1.22µm, PDAF, OIS, 2x optical zoom 48 MP, f/2.2, 14mm, 114˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, AF, gimbal OIS | 48 MP, f/1.5, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF, gimbal OIS 13 MP, f/2.5, 50mm (telephoto), 1/2.8", 0.8µm, PDAF, 2x optical zoom 13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚, 16mm (ultrawide) |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.5, 24mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | - |
| Video | 8K@30fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS, HDR10+ | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.5, 24mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | 32 MP, f/2.5, 24mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | - | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes |
| 32-bit/192kHz audio | 32-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS, NavIC |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, color spectrum | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| - | Virtual proximity sensing | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 55W wired 50W wireless Reverse wireless 5W reverse wired | 33W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 4500 mAh, non-removable | 4200 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue, Orange | Midnight Black, Shimmer Blue |
| Models | V2145A, V2114 | V2046 |
| Price | About 720 EUR | About 570 EUR |
| SAR | - | 0.53 W/kg (head) 0.81 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | Endurance rating 84h | Endurance rating 91h |
| Camera | Photo / Video | Photo / Video |
| Display | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | -24.8 LUFS (Very good) | -27.6 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 837833 (v9) GeekBench: 3469 (v5.1) GFXBench: 33fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | AnTuTu: 734811 (v8) GeekBench: 3749 (v5.1) GFXBench: 62fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo X70 Pro+
- Faster Snapdragon 888+ Chipset
- Faster Charging (55W Wired, 50W Wireless)
- Potentially Improved Camera Performance
- Reverse Wireless Charging
- Slightly Lower Battery Endurance
- No Specific Display Brightness Measurement
vivo X60 Pro
- Longer Battery Life (91h Endurance)
- Brighter Display (818 nits)
- More Affordable
- Excellent Camera System
- Slower Snapdragon 870 Chipset
- Slower Charging (33W Wired)
Display Comparison
The X60 Pro has a measured peak brightness of 818 nits, offering better outdoor visibility. Both phones feature an 'Infinite' contrast ratio, suggesting excellent black levels and vibrant colors. While the X70 Pro+ lacks a specific brightness measurement, vivo's displays are generally well-regarded for color accuracy and viewing angles. The X60 Pro's brightness gives it a slight edge.
Camera Comparison
Both phones are known for their excellent camera systems, but the X70 Pro+ likely has an edge due to its potentially more advanced sensor and image processing capabilities. While specific camera specs are missing, the X70 Pro+ is expected to offer improved low-light performance and video recording quality. Both phones feature impressive zoom capabilities.
Performance
The Snapdragon 888+ in the X70 Pro+ is a clear winner here. It offers a substantial performance boost over the Snapdragon 870 in the X60 Pro, resulting in smoother multitasking, faster app loading times, and improved gaming performance. The X70 Pro+'s 5nm process also contributes to better power efficiency despite the increased performance.
Battery Life
The X60 Pro edges out the X70 Pro+ in battery endurance, boasting a slightly higher endurance rating (91h vs 84h). However, the X70 Pro+’s 55W wired charging and 50W wireless charging significantly reduce charging times, offsetting the slight difference in battery life.
Buying Guide
The vivo X70 Pro+ is ideal for power users, mobile gamers, and photography enthusiasts who demand top-tier performance and fast charging. The vivo X60 Pro is a great choice for those seeking excellent camera capabilities, long battery life, and a more budget-friendly flagship experience.