vivo X70 Pro+ vs vivo V27 Pro: A Detailed Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The vivo V27 Pro emerges as the overall winner, offering a more modern chipset (Dimensity 8200), faster charging, and excellent battery life, all at a potentially more competitive price. While the X70 Pro+ boasts a Snapdragon 888+, the V27 Pro's improvements make it a stronger contender.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo X70 Pro+ | vivo V27 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 66 | 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE-A, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA - China | - | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, September 09 | 2023, March 01 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, September 17 | Available. Released 2023, March 01 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, plastic frame, glass back |
| Dimensions | 164.5 x 75.2 x 8.9 mm (6.48 x 2.96 x 0.35 in) | 164.1 x 74.8 x 7.4 mm (6.46 x 2.94 x 0.29 in) |
| SIM | Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 209 g / 213 g (7.37 oz) | 182 g (6.42 oz) |
| IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) | Color changing back panel color | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Resolution | 1440 x 3200 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~517 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~388 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 111.4 cm2 (~90.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.78 inches, 111.0 cm2 (~90.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | LTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 1000 nits (HBM), 1500 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+ |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X1 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.1 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888+ 5G (5 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 8200 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 660 | Mali-G610 MC6 |
| OS | Android 11, Funtouch OS 12 (International), OriginOS 1.0 (China) | Android 13, Funtouch 13 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Zeiss optics, Zeiss T* lens coating, Pixel Shift, dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | Ring-LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Quad | 50 MP, f/1.6, (wide), 1/1.31", 1.2µm, PDAF, Laser AF, OIS 8 MP, f/3.4, 125mm (periscope telephoto), 1/4.4", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS, 5x optical zoom 12 MP, f/1.6, 50mm (telephoto), 1/2.93", 1.22µm, PDAF, OIS, 2x optical zoom 48 MP, f/2.2, 14mm, 114˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, AF, gimbal OIS | - |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.5, 24mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | 50 MP, f/2.5, (wide), AF |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 8K@30fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS, HDR10+ | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | Dual-LED flash, HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.5, 24mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | 50 MP, f/2.5, (wide), AF |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | - | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes |
| 32-bit/192kHz audio | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, NavIC |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, color spectrum | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 55W wired 50W wireless Reverse wireless 5W reverse wired | 66W wired, 50% in 19 min, 72% in 30 min |
| Type | Li-Po 4500 mAh, non-removable | 4600 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue, Orange | Magic Blue, Noble Black |
| Models | V2145A, V2114 | V2230 |
| Price | About 720 EUR | About 440 EUR |
| SAR | - | 1.22 W/kg (head) 0.89 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | Endurance rating 84h | Endurance rating 121h |
| Camera | Photo / Video | Photo / Video |
| Display | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | -24.8 LUFS (Very good) | -29.1 LUFS (Average) |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 837833 (v9) GeekBench: 3469 (v5.1) GFXBench: 33fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | AnTuTu: 846767 (v9) GeekBench: 3933 (v5.1), 3421 (v6) GFXBench: 57fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo X70 Pro+
- Potentially refined camera system
- Established flagship chipset (Snapdragon 888+)
- Premium build quality
- Older chipset compared to V27 Pro
- Slower charging speeds
- Lower battery life
vivo V27 Pro
- Modern Dimensity 8200 chipset
- Excellent battery life and endurance
- Faster 66W charging
- High peak brightness display
- Camera performance may not match X70 Pro+'s peak (needs testing)
- Potentially less premium build materials
Display Comparison
Both phones feature vibrant displays with excellent contrast (nominal 'infinite' ratio). However, the V27 Pro's measured 978 nits peak brightness gives it a noticeable edge in outdoor visibility. The X70 Pro+ display, while excellent, lacks this brightness advantage. Color accuracy is likely comparable, with both offering vivid and pleasing visuals.
Camera Comparison
Both phones are marketed as camera-centric devices. The X70 Pro+ historically had a reputation for excellent image processing and a versatile camera system, often featuring a periscope telephoto lens. The V27 Pro likely features a strong main sensor and improved computational photography. A direct comparison would require extensive testing, but both are expected to deliver high-quality photos and videos.
Performance
The vivo V27 Pro's Dimensity 8200 chipset is a significant upgrade over the X70 Pro+'s Snapdragon 888+. The Dimensity 8200 offers better efficiency and improved CPU/GPU performance, resulting in smoother multitasking and gaming. While the 888+ is still capable, the V27 Pro provides a more future-proofed experience.
Battery Life
The vivo V27 Pro takes a clear lead in battery life, boasting an endurance rating of 121h compared to the X70 Pro+'s 84h. Coupled with its 66W wired charging (50% in 19 min, 72% in 30 min), it offers significantly faster charging and longer usage times than the X70 Pro+'s 55W wired charging.
Buying Guide
The vivo X70 Pro+ is ideal for users prioritizing a slightly more established flagship chipset and potentially a more refined camera experience (though both are excellent). The vivo V27 Pro is perfect for those seeking a balance of performance, battery life, and fast charging, especially if budget is a key consideration.