Realme GT 8 Pro vs. vivo X60t: A Head-to-Head Flagship Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing raw performance and ultra-fast charging, the Realme GT 8 Pro is the clear winner. Its Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 chipset and 120W charging capabilities significantly outperform the vivo X60t. However, the X60t remains a viable option for those seeking a balanced experience and potentially a lower price.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo X60t | Realme GT 8 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66, 71 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 28, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1x | - | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, April 03 | 2025, October 21 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, April 03 | Available. Released 2025, October 21 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 7i), aluminum alloy frame, fiber-reinforced plastic back or silicone polymer (eco leather) back |
| Dimensions | 159.6 x 75 x 7.4 mm (6.28 x 2.95 x 0.29 in) | 161.8 x 76.9 x 8.2 mm (6.37 x 3.03 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM + eSIM (max 2 at a time) - International· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM - China |
| Weight | 175.5 g (6.21 oz) | 214 g or 218 g (7.69 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 7i, Mohs level 4 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2376 pixels (~398 ppi density) | 1440 x 3136 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~508 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.56 inches, 104.6 cm2 (~87.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.79 inches, 112.8 cm2 (~90.7% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+ | AMOLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, HDR10+, HDR Vivid, Dolby Vision, 1000 nits (typ), 2000 nits (HBM), 7000 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x4.6 GHz Oryon V3 Phoenix L + 6x3.62 GHz Oryon V3 Phoenix M) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 1100 (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM8850-AC Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (3 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 | Adreno 840 |
| OS | Android 11, OriginOS 1.0 | Android 16, up to 4 major Android upgrades, Realme UI 7.0 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | - | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Zeiss optics, color spectrum sensor, Pixel Shift, LED flash, HDR, panorama | Ricoh lens, Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama, switchable camera bump |
| Quad | 48 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF, gimbal OIS 13 MP, f/2.5, 50mm (telephoto), 1/2.8", 0.8µm, PDAF, 2x optical zoom 13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚, 16mm (ultrawide) | - |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.5, 24mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | - |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, 22mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 200 MP, f/2.6, 65mm, (periscope telephoto), 1/1.56", 0.5µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom 50 MP, f/2.0, 16mm, 116˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.88", 0.64µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 8K@30fps, 4K@30/60/120fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS, HDR, Dolby Vision, 10-bit LOG |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | Panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.5, 24mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | 32 MP, f/2.4, 24mm (wide), 1/3.1", 0.7µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps; gyro-EIS, HDR, Dolby Vision |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | - |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 6.0, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, LHDC 5 |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes, 360˚ |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS | GPS (L1+L5), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), GLONASS, NavIC (L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Virtual proximity sensing | - | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 33W wired | 120W wired, 120W UFCS, 14.4W PD, 55W PPS, 14.4W QC, 15 min to 50%, 43 min to 100% 50W wireless, 79 min to 100% 10W wireless reverse 5W reverse wired |
| Type | 4300 mAh | Si/C Li-Ion 7000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Gray, Aurora | Diary White, Urban Blue, Green, Aston Martin Green |
| Models | V2085A | RMX5210 |
| Price | About 450 EUR | € 899.99 |
| SAR | - | 0.99 W/kg (head) 1.27 W/kg (body) |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | - | 60:32h endurance, 1100 cycles |
| Energy | - | Class B |
| Free fall | - | Class D (60 falls) |
| Repairability | - | Class C |
vivo X60t
- Potentially more affordable price point
- Balanced overall experience
- Refined software experience (typical of vivo)
- Significantly slower charging
- Less powerful processor
- Likely lower peak display brightness
Realme GT 8 Pro
- Blazing-fast Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 processor
- Ultra-fast 120W charging
- Extremely bright display (2262 nits)
- Potentially higher price
- May run hotter under sustained load
- Realme UI may not appeal to all users
Display Comparison
The Realme GT 8 Pro boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured peak of 2262 nits. This translates to superior visibility in direct sunlight compared to the X60t, which lacks specific brightness data but is expected to be considerably lower. While both likely utilize AMOLED panels for vibrant colors, the GT 8 Pro’s brightness advantage is a substantial benefit for outdoor use. The absence of refresh rate data for the X60t means the GT 8 Pro likely has an advantage in smoothness as well, assuming a standard 120Hz panel.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications for the vivo X60t, a direct comparison is limited. However, the Realme GT 8 Pro is expected to feature a more advanced camera system, leveraging the processing power of the Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 for improved image quality and computational photography. The GT 8 Pro’s likely larger sensor and advanced image processing algorithms will result in better low-light performance and dynamic range. The X60t’s camera is likely competent, but will struggle to match the GT 8 Pro’s capabilities.
Performance
The performance gap between these devices is substantial. The Realme GT 8 Pro’s Qualcomm SM8850-AC Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (3nm) with its Oryon V3 Phoenix CPU cores (2x4.6 GHz + 6x3.62 GHz) represents a significant leap over the vivo X60t’s Mediatek Dimensity 1100 (6nm) and its Cortex-A78/A55 configuration (4x2.6 GHz + 4x2.0 GHz). The 3nm process node of the Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 delivers superior power efficiency and thermal management, minimizing throttling during sustained workloads. This translates to noticeably faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and a more responsive gaming experience on the GT 8 Pro.
Battery Life
The Realme GT 8 Pro dominates in charging speed, offering 120W wired charging (including UFCS, PD, PPS, and QC standards) capable of reaching 50% charge in just 15 minutes and 100% in 43 minutes. It also supports 50W wireless charging and even reverse wireless/wired charging. The vivo X60t’s 33W wired charging is significantly slower, requiring considerably longer to fully charge. While the GT 8 Pro’s battery endurance is rated at 60:32h, the X60t’s battery life is not specified, but the faster charging of the GT 8 Pro mitigates any potential capacity disadvantage.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo X60t if you need a well-rounded flagship experience with a focus on balanced performance and a potentially more affordable price. It's ideal for everyday users who value a smooth experience without needing the absolute fastest processing speeds. Buy the Realme GT 8 Pro if you prioritize uncompromising performance for gaming and demanding tasks, coupled with the convenience of incredibly rapid charging – a perfect fit for power users and mobile gamers.