Oppo Find X3 Pro vs vivo X60t: Which Flagship Reigns Supreme?
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Oppo Find X3 Pro emerges as the superior choice. Its Snapdragon 888 chipset provides a performance edge, complemented by significantly faster 65W wired and 30W wireless charging. While the X60t is a capable device, the X3 Pro’s overall package justifies its higher initial cost.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo X60t | Oppo Find X3 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 28, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1x | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA - China | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, April 03 | 2021, March 11 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, April 03 | Available. Released 2021, March 19 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 159.6 x 75 x 7.4 mm (6.28 x 2.95 x 0.29 in) | 163.6 x 74 x 8.3 mm (6.44 x 2.91 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM |
| Weight | 175.5 g (6.21 oz) | 193 g (6.81 oz) |
| - | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2376 pixels (~398 ppi density) | 1440 x 3216 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~525 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.56 inches, 104.6 cm2 (~87.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 108.4 cm2 (~89.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+ | LTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, BT.2020, 500 nits (typ), 1300 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-X1 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 1100 (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888 5G (5 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 | Adreno 660 |
| OS | Android 11, OriginOS 1.0 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 14, ColorOS 14 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Zeiss optics, color spectrum sensor, Pixel Shift, LED flash, HDR, panorama | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 48 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF, gimbal OIS 13 MP, f/2.5, 50mm (telephoto), 1/2.8", 0.8µm, PDAF, 2x optical zoom 13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚, 16mm (ultrawide) | 50 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.4, 52mm (telephoto), 1/3.4", 1.0µm, 2x optical zoom, PDAF 50 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 110˚ (ultrawide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF 3 MP, f/3.0, (microscope), AF, ring flash, 60x magnification |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.5, 24mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | - |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps; gyro-EIS; HDR, 10‑bit video |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | Panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.5, 24mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | 32 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Virtual proximity sensing | - | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 33W wired | 65W wired, PD, 40% in 10 min 30W wireless, 100% in 80 min 10W reverse wireless |
| Type | 4300 mAh | Li-Po 4500 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Gray, Aurora | Gloss Black, Blue, White, Cosmic Mocha, Mars Edition, Photographer Edition |
| Models | V2085A | CPH2173, PEEM00, OPG03 |
| Price | About 450 EUR | About 200 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 81h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -25.4 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 656467 (v8) GeekBench: 3316 (v5.1) GFXBench: 33fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo X60t
- Faster Snapdragon 888 processor
- Significantly faster 65W wired charging
- 30W wireless charging support
- Likely superior display brightness and contrast
- Higher initial price
- Potential for thermal throttling under extreme load
Oppo Find X3 Pro
- Potentially more affordable price point
- Capable Dimensity 1100 processor
- Good battery endurance (81h)
- Balanced overall experience
- Slower 33W wired charging
- Less powerful processor compared to Snapdragon 888
Display Comparison
The Oppo Find X3 Pro boasts a display capable of reaching 774 nits of peak brightness, ensuring excellent visibility even in direct sunlight. While the X60t’s display specs aren’t provided, Oppo’s focus on display quality suggests a vibrant panel. However, the X3 Pro’s infinite contrast ratio (nominal) indicates a superior viewing experience with deeper blacks. The absence of refresh rate information for the X60t is a notable omission, while the X3 Pro’s display is likely to have a higher PWM dimming rate, potentially reducing eye strain for sensitive users.
Camera Comparison
Both devices are marketed as having strong camera capabilities (Photo/Video). However, without specific sensor details for the X60t, it’s difficult to make a direct comparison. The X3 Pro likely benefits from Qualcomm’s image signal processor (ISP) within the Snapdragon 888, offering advanced image processing capabilities. The X3 Pro’s camera system is likely to have a larger main sensor, enabling better low-light performance and dynamic range. The absence of details regarding OIS or lens apertures on the X60t makes it difficult to assess its photographic strengths.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets: the Oppo Find X3 Pro utilizes the Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G (5nm) while the vivo X60t features the MediaTek Dimensity 1100 (6nm). The Snapdragon 888, with its Cortex-X1 prime core clocked at 2.84 GHz, offers a noticeable performance advantage over the Dimensity 1100’s Cortex-A78 cores at 2.6 GHz. The 5nm fabrication process of the Snapdragon 888 also contributes to better thermal efficiency, potentially mitigating throttling during sustained workloads. While the Dimensity 1100 is a capable performer, the Snapdragon 888 is the clear winner for demanding tasks like video editing and high-end gaming.
Battery Life
Both phones achieve an endurance rating of 81 hours, suggesting comparable battery life despite differing battery capacities (not specified for the X60t). However, the charging capabilities are vastly different. The Oppo Find X3 Pro supports 65W wired charging, achieving 40% charge in just 10 minutes, alongside 30W wireless and 10W reverse wireless charging. The vivo X60t is limited to 33W wired charging, a significantly slower rate. This charging speed disparity is a major advantage for the X3 Pro, allowing for quick top-ups and minimizing downtime.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo X60t if you prioritize a balanced experience and are seeking a flagship-level phone without the absolute highest price tag. It’s ideal for users who enjoy mobile gaming but aren’t pushing for maximum frame rates in demanding titles. Buy the Oppo Find X3 Pro if you demand the best possible performance, fastest charging speeds, and a more refined overall experience, and are willing to pay a premium for it. This phone is geared towards power users and photography enthusiasts.