OnePlus 9RT 5G vs vivo X60t: A Deep Dive into Performance and Value
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the OnePlus 9RT 5G emerges as the stronger choice. Its Snapdragon 888 offers a significant performance advantage, particularly in demanding tasks like gaming, and the 65W charging dramatically reduces downtime. While the X60t is a capable device, the 9RT’s raw power and faster charging justify the price difference.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo X60t | OnePlus 9RT 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1800 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 - Global |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 28, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 41, 78 SA/NSA - Global |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat18 1200/200 Mbps, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1x | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, April 03 | 2021, October 13 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, April 03 | Available. Released 2021, October 19 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 159.6 x 75 x 7.4 mm (6.28 x 2.95 x 0.29 in) | 162.2 x 74.6 x 8.3 mm (6.39 x 2.94 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 175.5 g (6.21 oz) | 198.5 g (7.02 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2376 pixels (~398 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~397 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.56 inches, 104.6 cm2 (~87.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.62 inches, 106.3 cm2 (~87.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+ | AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+ |
| - | Always-on display | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-X1 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 1100 (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888 5G (5 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 | Adreno 660 |
| OS | Android 11, OriginOS 1.0 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 13, OxygenOS 13 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Zeiss optics, color spectrum sensor, Pixel Shift, LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 48 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF, gimbal OIS 13 MP, f/2.5, 50mm (telephoto), 1/2.8", 0.8µm, PDAF, 2x optical zoom 13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚, 16mm (ultrawide) | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56”, 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 16 MP, f/2.2, 14mm, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.6", 1.0µm 2 MP (macro) |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.5, 24mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | 16 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps, Auto HDR, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.5, 24mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | 16 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1), GALILEO (E1+E5a) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Virtual proximity sensing | - | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 33W wired | 65W wired, 100% in 29 min |
| Type | 4300 mAh | Li-Po 4500 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Gray, Aurora | Hacker Black, Nano Silver, Blue |
| Models | V2085A | MT2110, MT2111 |
| Price | About 450 EUR | About 590 EUR |
vivo X60t
- Potentially more refined software experience (Funtouch OS)
- Slightly more affordable price point (likely)
- Competent all-around performance for everyday tasks
- Significantly slower charging speeds (33W)
- Less powerful chipset (Dimensity 1100)
- Potential for more throttling under heavy load
OnePlus 9RT 5G
- Superior performance with Snapdragon 888
- Ultra-fast 65W charging (0-100% in 29 minutes)
- More efficient chipset for potentially better battery life
- OxygenOS can be polarizing (though generally well-regarded)
- May run slightly warmer under sustained load
- Potentially higher price tag
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a cutting-edge display, but both are perfectly adequate. Specifics regarding panel type (AMOLED vs LCD) and refresh rate are missing, but assuming both are AMOLED (consistent with their market positioning), the key differentiator will be peak brightness and color calibration. Without concrete data, it's difficult to declare a winner, but OnePlus typically prioritizes vibrant, punchy colors, while vivo often aims for more natural accuracy. Bezels are likely comparable, given the similar overall form factors.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specs (sensor size, aperture, OIS), a direct comparison is challenging. However, both brands generally prioritize strong camera performance. The Snapdragon 888’s ISP (Image Signal Processor) is generally considered more advanced, offering better noise reduction and dynamic range. The X60t may leverage vivo’s image processing expertise to deliver pleasing results, but the 9RT likely has an edge in challenging lighting conditions. We can assume both phones will feature a multi-camera setup, but the quality of the supporting lenses (ultrawide, macro) will be crucial. Ignoring the likely inclusion of low-resolution macro lenses on both devices, the main sensor and its associated processing will be the deciding factor.
Performance
The performance gap is the most significant distinction. The OnePlus 9RT 5G’s Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888 5G (5 nm) is a substantial upgrade over the vivo X60t’s Mediatek Dimensity 1100 (6 nm). The Snapdragon 888 features the more powerful Cortex-X1 prime core clocked at 2.84 GHz, compared to the X60t’s 2.6 GHz Cortex-A78. This translates to faster app loading, smoother multitasking, and significantly better gaming performance. The 5nm process node of the Snapdragon 888 also contributes to improved thermal efficiency, potentially mitigating throttling during extended gaming sessions. While the Dimensity 1100 is no slouch, it simply can’t match the raw processing power of the Snapdragon 888.
Battery Life
The vivo X60t’s 33W wired charging is noticeably slower than the OnePlus 9RT 5G’s 65W wired charging, which boasts a full charge in just 29 minutes. While battery capacity isn’t specified, the faster charging of the 9RT significantly reduces downtime. A larger battery capacity on the X60t could partially offset this, but the convenience of rapidly topping up the 9RT is a major advantage for users who frequently drain their battery. The Snapdragon 888’s improved efficiency may also contribute to comparable real-world battery life despite potentially having a smaller capacity.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo X60t if you prioritize a slightly more refined software experience (typical of vivo’s Funtouch OS) and are comfortable with slower charging speeds. It’s a solid all-rounder for everyday tasks. Buy the OnePlus 9RT 5G if you’re a power user, gamer, or frequently find yourself needing to quickly top up your battery. The Snapdragon 888 and 65W charging make it the clear winner for performance and convenience.