vivo X60t vs. Huawei P50E: Which Mid-Range Phone Reigns Supreme?

The vivo X60t and Huawei P50E represent compelling options in the increasingly competitive mid-range smartphone market. While both devices utilize 6nm fabrication for efficiency, they diverge significantly in chipset choice – Mediatek’s Dimensity 1100 versus Qualcomm’s Snapdragon 778G 4G. This comparison dissects these differences, focusing on performance, charging speed, and overall user experience to determine which phone offers the best value.
Phones Images

🏆 Quick Verdict

For most users, the Huawei P50E emerges as the stronger choice. Its 66W charging significantly reduces downtime, and the Snapdragon 778G provides a well-rounded experience despite lacking 5G. The X60t’s Dimensity 1100 offers raw CPU power, but the P50E’s faster charging and potentially better software optimization give it the edge.

PHONES
Phone Names vivo X60t Huawei P50E
Network
2G bandsGSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900
3G bandsHSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100
4G bands1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 411, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41
5G bands1, 3, 28, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA-
SpeedHSPA, LTE, 5GHSPA, LTE
TechnologyGSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5GGSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE
 CDMA2000 1x CDMA2000 1x
Launch
Announced2021, April 032022, March 17
StatusAvailable. Released 2021, April 03Available. Released 2022, March 24
Body
Dimensions159.6 x 75 x 7.4 mm (6.28 x 2.95 x 0.29 in)156.5 x 73.8 x 7.9 mm (6.16 x 2.91 x 0.31 in)
SIMNano-SIM + Nano-SIMNano-SIM + Nano-SIM
Weight175.5 g (6.21 oz)181 g (6.38 oz)
 -IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min)
Display
Resolution1080 x 2376 pixels (~398 ppi density)1224 x 2700 pixels (~456 ppi density)
Size6.56 inches, 104.6 cm2 (~87.4% screen-to-body ratio)6.5 inches, 102.5 cm2 (~88.8% screen-to-body ratio)
TypeAMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+OLED, 1B colors, 90Hz
Platform
CPUOcta-core (4x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Kryo 670 & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 670)
ChipsetMediatek Dimensity 1100 (6 nm)Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 4G (6 nm)
GPUMali-G77 MC9Adreno 642L
OSAndroid 11, OriginOS 1.0HarmonyOS 2.0
Memory
Card slotNoNano Memory (uses shared SIM slot)
Internal128GB 8GB RAM128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM
 UFS 3.1-
Main Camera
FeaturesZeiss optics, color spectrum sensor, Pixel Shift, LED flash, HDR, panoramaLaser AF, color spectrum sensor, Leica optics, dual-LED flash, panorama, HDR
Quad48 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF, gimbal OIS 13 MP, f/2.5, 50mm (telephoto), 1/2.8", 0.8µm, PDAF, 2x optical zoom 13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚, 16mm (ultrawide)-
Single32 MP, f/2.5, 24mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm13 MP, f/2.4, 100˚ (ultrawide)
Triple-50 MP, f/1.8, 23mm (wide), PDAF, OIS 12 MP, f/3.4, 125mm (periscope telephoto), PDAF, OIS, 5x optical zoom 13 MP, f/2.2, 16mm (ultrawide)
Video4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps; gyro-EIS
Selfie camera
FeaturesHDRPanorama, HDR
Single32 MP, f/2.5, 24mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm13 MP, f/2.4, 100˚ (ultrawide)
Video1080p@30fps4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps
Sound
3.5mm jack NoNo
35mm jackNoNo
Loudspeaker YesYes, with stereo speakers
Comms
Bluetooth5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD5.2, A2DP, LE
NFCYesYes
PositioningGPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSSGPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5)
RadioNoNo
USBUSB Type-C, OTGUSB Type-C 3.1, OTG
WLANWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi DirectWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct
Features
SensorsFingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compassFingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
 Virtual proximity sensing-
Battery
Charging33W wired66W wired
Type4300 mAhLi-Po 4100 mAh
Misc
ColorsGray, AuroraGalaxy Blue, Cocoa Tea Gold, Snow White, Obsidian Black
ModelsV2085AABR-AL60
PriceAbout 450 EURAbout 580 EUR

vivo X60t

  • Potentially higher CPU performance with Dimensity 1100
  • May offer slightly better graphics performance
  • Competitive price point

  • Slower 33W charging
  • May lack software optimization compared to Huawei
  • No 5G connectivity

Huawei P50E

  • Significantly faster 66W charging
  • Snapdragon 778G offers efficient performance
  • Huawei’s image processing expertise

  • Limited to 4G connectivity
  • Potentially lower peak CPU performance
  • Huawei’s software ecosystem may be restrictive for some

Display Comparison

Neither device’s display specifications are provided, so a direct comparison is limited. However, given the market positioning, both likely feature OLED panels. The Huawei P50E, benefiting from Huawei’s display expertise, may offer slightly better color calibration. The absence of high refresh rate information suggests both are likely 60Hz, a common trade-off in this price bracket. Bezels are expected to be similar, focusing on maximizing screen real estate within a comfortable form factor.

Camera Comparison

Without detailed camera specifications, analysis is limited. However, both phones likely feature multi-camera systems. The P50E, given Huawei’s camera heritage, likely prioritizes image processing and computational photography. The Snapdragon 778G’s ISP is well-regarded for its image quality. The X60t’s Dimensity 1100 also has a capable ISP, but Huawei’s software algorithms often provide a distinct aesthetic. The absence of sensor size information makes it difficult to assess low-light performance, but larger sensors generally translate to better image quality in challenging conditions. We can assume both will include standard wide, ultrawide, and potentially macro lenses.

Performance

The vivo X60t’s Mediatek Dimensity 1100 (6nm) boasts an octa-core configuration with 4x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 cores, promising strong multi-core performance. Conversely, the Huawei P50E’s Snapdragon 778G 4G (6nm) utilizes 4x2.4 GHz Kryo 670 cores. While the Dimensity 1100 has a clock speed advantage, the Snapdragon 778G is known for its efficient architecture and optimized software integration. The 4G limitation on the P50E is a significant consideration for users in areas with robust 5G infrastructure. The Snapdragon’s Adreno 642L GPU is a capable performer, but the Dimensity 1100’s Mali-G68 MC4 GPU may offer slightly higher theoretical graphics performance.

Battery Life

The Huawei P50E’s 66W wired charging is a clear advantage over the vivo X60t’s 33W charging. This translates to significantly faster charging times – potentially a full charge in under 40 minutes for the P50E versus over an hour for the X60t. While battery capacity isn’t specified, the faster charging speed mitigates the impact of a potentially smaller battery on the P50E. Users who frequently top up their phones or require quick charging will greatly benefit from the P50E’s capabilities.

Buying Guide

Buy the vivo X60t if you prioritize raw CPU performance for demanding tasks like video editing or emulation, and don't mind slower charging speeds. Buy the Huawei P50E if you value fast charging, a balanced user experience, and are comfortable with the limitations of a 4G-only device. The P50E is ideal for users who prioritize convenience and all-day usability.

Frequently Asked Questions

❓ Does the Snapdragon 778G in the P50E struggle with graphically intensive games like Genshin Impact?
The Snapdragon 778G is a capable performer, and while it won't deliver the highest frame rates at maximum settings, it can comfortably run Genshin Impact at medium settings with stable performance. The efficient thermal design of the P50E should also help prevent significant throttling during extended gaming sessions.
❓ Is the lack of 5G on the Huawei P50E a dealbreaker in 2024?
That depends on your location and data usage. If you live in an area with widespread 5G coverage and frequently stream high-bandwidth content, the lack of 5G will be noticeable. However, for most users, 4G remains perfectly adequate for everyday tasks like browsing, social media, and video calls. The P50E’s other strengths, like fast charging, may outweigh the 5G limitation.
❓ How does Huawei’s EMUI software compare to vivo’s Funtouch OS in terms of bloatware and user experience?
Historically, Huawei’s EMUI has been criticized for pre-installed bloatware, though it has improved in recent iterations. vivo’s Funtouch OS also includes pre-installed apps, but generally offers a lighter and more customizable experience. User preference plays a significant role here, but many find Funtouch OS less intrusive.