The vivo X60t and Honor V40 Lite represent compelling options in the increasingly competitive mid-range smartphone market. Both leverage Mediatek's Dimensity series, but target slightly different priorities. The X60t emphasizes raw processing power with the Dimensity 1100, while the V40 Lite prioritizes charging speed and potentially, a more aggressive price point. This comparison dissects their key differences to determine which phone best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing sustained performance in demanding applications and future-proofing, the vivo X60t is the better choice thanks to its superior Dimensity 1100 chipset. However, the Honor V40 Lite’s blazing-fast 66W charging and potential for a lower price make it ideal for users who value convenience and rapid power-ups above all else.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 8, 18, 19, 26, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 28, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA | 1, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | CDMA2000 1x | CDMA 800 |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, April 03 | 2021, March 23 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, April 03 | Available. Released 2021, March 28 |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | 159.6 x 75 x 7.4 mm (6.28 x 2.95 x 0.29 in) | 160.1 x 74.1 x 7.6 mm (6.30 x 2.92 x 0.30 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 175.5 g (6.21 oz) | 169 g (5.96 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2376 pixels (~398 ppi density) | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~392 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.56 inches, 104.6 cm2 (~87.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.57 inches, 106.0 cm2 (~89.3% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+ | OLED, 1B colors, HDR10, 90Hz |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 1100 (6 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 800U (7 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 | Mali-G57 MC3 |
| OS | Android 11, OriginOS 1.0 | Android 10, Magic UI 4.0, no Google Play Services |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | UFS 3.1 | UFS |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | Zeiss optics, color spectrum sensor, Pixel Shift, LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Quad | 48 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF, gimbal OIS
13 MP, f/2.5, 50mm (telephoto), 1/2.8", 0.8µm, PDAF, 2x optical zoom
13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚, 16mm (ultrawide) | 64 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), PDAF
8 MP, f/2.4, 120˚, 17mm (ultrawide)
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.5, 24mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | 32 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 4K, 1080p, 720p@960fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.5, 24mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | 32 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| | Virtual proximity sensing | - |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 33W wired | 66W wired, 60% in 15 min, 100% in 35 min
5W reverse wired |
| Type | 4300 mAh | Li-Po 3800 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Gray, Aurora | Black, Blue, Green |
| Models | V2085A | ALA-AN70 |
| Price | About 450 EUR | About 390 EUR |
vivo X60t
- More powerful Dimensity 1100 chipset
- Superior CPU performance for demanding tasks
- Potentially better image processing capabilities
- Slower 33W charging
- Likely a higher price point
Honor V40 Lite
- Blazing-fast 66W wired charging
- 5W reverse wired charging
- Potentially more affordable price
- Less powerful Dimensity 800U chipset
- Lower CPU performance compared to the X60t
Display Comparison
Neither device's display specifications are provided, so a direct comparison is limited. However, given the market positioning, we can infer that both likely utilize AMOLED panels. The Honor V40 Lite, being a 'Lite' model, may feature a slightly lower resolution or peak brightness. The X60t, positioned as a more premium offering, may have a higher refresh rate or better color accuracy. Without specific data, it's reasonable to assume both offer acceptable viewing experiences for their respective price brackets.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications, a precise comparison is difficult. However, the chipset difference suggests the X60t may have a more capable image signal processor (ISP), enabling faster image processing and potentially better low-light performance. The X60t’s more powerful CPU can also assist with computational photography tasks. It’s likely both phones feature similar camera setups targeting the mid-range segment, but the X60t’s processing power gives it an edge in image quality and features.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The vivo X60t’s Mediatek Dimensity 1100 (6nm) boasts a more powerful CPU configuration – four Cortex-A78 cores clocked at 2.6 GHz versus the Honor V40 Lite’s Dimensity 800U (7nm) with two Cortex-A76 cores at 2.4 GHz. While the 800U benefits from a slightly more efficient 7nm process, the A78 cores in the 1100 offer a significant architectural advantage in single-core and multi-core performance. This translates to snappier app launches, smoother multitasking, and better gaming performance on the X60t. The 6nm node also suggests better thermal efficiency, potentially reducing throttling during extended gaming sessions. The V40 Lite’s 800U is still a capable chip, but the X60t holds a clear lead in raw processing power.
Battery Life
The Honor V40 Lite’s 66W wired charging is the standout feature here. The ability to charge from 0 to 60% in 15 minutes and 100% in 35 minutes is a significant advantage for users who prioritize convenience. The X60t’s 33W charging is considerably slower. While battery capacity isn’t specified for either device, the faster charging of the V40 Lite effectively mitigates any potential capacity disadvantage. The V40 Lite also includes 5W reverse wired charging, a feature absent on the X60t, adding to its versatility.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo X60t if you frequently engage in mobile gaming, video editing, or other resource-intensive tasks and need a phone that can handle them without significant throttling. Buy the Honor V40 Lite if you prioritize minimizing downtime with incredibly fast charging, often find yourself away from power outlets, and are looking for a strong value proposition without sacrificing essential features.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Dimensity 800U in the Honor V40 Lite struggle with graphically intensive games like Genshin Impact?
While the Dimensity 800U is capable, Genshin Impact and similar titles will likely require reduced graphics settings for a consistently smooth experience. The X60t’s Dimensity 1100 offers a more comfortable gaming experience at higher settings due to its superior GPU and CPU performance.
❓ How much faster is the 66W charging on the Honor V40 Lite compared to the 33W charging on the vivo X60t in real-world use?
The 66W charging on the V40 Lite is significantly faster. Expect a full charge in approximately 35 minutes, whereas the X60t will likely take over an hour. This difference is particularly noticeable for users who need a quick top-up before leaving the house.
❓ Does the vivo X60t’s more powerful processor translate to a noticeable difference in everyday tasks like browsing and social media?
For basic tasks like browsing and social media, the difference will be minimal. However, when multitasking with several apps open or switching between demanding applications, the X60t’s Dimensity 1100 will provide a smoother and more responsive experience.
