vivo X60t Pro+ vs Xiaomi 12 Pro (Dimensity): A Deep Dive into Flagship Performance
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Xiaomi 12 Pro (Dimensity) emerges as the stronger choice. Its Mediatek Dimensity 9000+ chipset, fabricated on a more efficient 4nm process, offers superior sustained performance and thermal management compared to the vivo X60t Pro+'s 5nm Snapdragon 888. The faster 67W charging is also a significant advantage.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo X60t Pro+ | Xiaomi 12 Pro (Dimensity) |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 26, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 28, 38, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| - | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, June 28 | 2022, July 04 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, June 28 | Available. Released 2022, July 13 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, eco leather back, aluminum frame | - |
| Dimensions | 158.6 x 73.4 x 9.1 mm (6.24 x 2.89 x 0.36 in) | 163.6 x 74.6 x 8.2 mm (6.44 x 2.94 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 191 g (6.74 oz) | 201 g (7.09 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2376 pixels (~398 ppi density) | 1440 x 3200 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~521 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.56 inches, 104.6 cm2 (~89.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.73 inches, 109.4 cm2 (~89.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1300 nits (peak) | LTPO2 AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 1000 nits (HBM), 1500 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-X1 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55 | Octa-core (1x3.20 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.85 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888 5G (5 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 9000+ (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 660 | Mali-G710 MC10 |
| OS | Android 11, OriginOS 1.0 | Android 12, MIUI 13 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| - | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, Zeiss optics, Zeiss T* lens coating, Pixel Shift, dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | Color spectrum sensor, Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 50 MP, f/1.6, (wide), 1/1.31", 1.2µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/3.4, 125mm (periscope telephoto), 1/4.0", PDAF, OIS, 5x optical zoom 12 MP, f/2.0, 50mm (telephoto), PDAF, 2x optical zoom 48 MP, 114˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, gimbal OIS, PDAF | - |
| Single | - | 32 MP, f/2.5, 26mm (wide), 0.7µm |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.9, 24mm (wide), 1/1.28", 1.22µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.4, 15mm, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.06", 1.12µm 5 MP, f/2.4, 50mm (telephoto macro), AF |
| Video | 8K@30fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS, HDR10+ | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.5, 24mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | 32 MP, f/2.5, 26mm (wide), 0.7µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/60fps, 720p@120fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| - | 24-bit/192kHz audio Tuned by Harman Kardon | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, NavIC | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 55W wired | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC4 |
| Type | 4200 mAh | Li-Po 5160 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Orange, Emperor Blue | Gray, Blue |
| Models | V2056A | 2207122MC |
| Price | About 650 EUR | About 570 EUR |
| SAR | 0.80 W/kg (head) 0.47 W/kg (body) | - |
vivo X60t Pro+
- Proven Snapdragon 888 performance
- Potentially excellent camera image processing
- Established brand reputation
- 5nm process prone to thermal throttling
- Slower 55W charging
- Older chipset architecture
Xiaomi 12 Pro (Dimensity)
- More efficient 4nm Dimensity 9000+ chipset
- Faster 67W charging with PD3.0/QC4
- Superior sustained performance
- MediaTek chipset may have less software support (historically)
- Camera performance dependent on sensor choice
Display Comparison
While both phones likely feature high-refresh-rate AMOLED displays (data not provided), the core difference lies in the underlying chipsets impacting display responsiveness. The Dimensity 9000+’s superior GPU could translate to smoother animations and higher frame rates in graphically intensive applications. The Xiaomi 12 Pro’s potential for higher peak brightness, coupled with the Dimensity’s processing power, could result in a more vibrant and engaging viewing experience, especially outdoors. We expect both to have excellent color accuracy, typical of flagship devices.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specs, it’s difficult to make a definitive judgment. However, the Snapdragon 888’s ISP in the X60t Pro+ is known for its strong image processing capabilities, particularly in low-light conditions. The Xiaomi 12 Pro’s Dimensity 9000+ also features a capable ISP, but its performance will depend on the sensor and lens choices. The 4nm process of the Dimensity chip could also contribute to more efficient image processing, potentially reducing noise and improving dynamic range. The absence of information on sensor size and OIS makes a precise comparison impossible, but the Xiaomi 12 Pro’s newer chipset offers potential for advanced computational photography features.
Performance
The Mediatek Dimensity 9000+ in the Xiaomi 12 Pro boasts a Cortex-X2 prime core clocked at 3.20 GHz, exceeding the Snapdragon 888’s 2.84 GHz Cortex-X1. This, combined with the 4nm fabrication process versus the Snapdragon’s 5nm, provides a significant advantage in both peak and sustained performance. The Dimensity 9000+’s Cortex-A710 cores, clocked at 2.85 GHz, are also more efficient than the Snapdragon 888’s Cortex-A78 cores. This translates to less throttling during prolonged gaming sessions, benefiting gamers and power users. The Xiaomi 12 Pro also benefits from potentially faster LPDDR5x RAM, further enhancing performance.
Battery Life
The Xiaomi 12 Pro’s 67W charging with PD3.0 and QC4 support significantly outperforms the vivo X60t Pro+'s 55W wired charging. This means the Xiaomi 12 Pro will likely achieve a 0-100% charge in a shorter timeframe. While battery capacity isn’t specified, the Dimensity 9000+’s superior efficiency could offset a potentially smaller battery size, resulting in comparable or even better real-world battery life compared to the X60t Pro+. The more efficient chipset means less power draw during typical usage.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo X60t Pro+ if you prioritize a proven camera system and are comfortable with potentially more aggressive thermal throttling during extended, demanding tasks. Buy the Xiaomi 12 Pro (Dimensity) if you value sustained performance, faster charging, and a more modern chipset architecture for future software support and efficiency.