vivo X60t Pro+ vs Oppo Find X5 Pro: A Deep Dive into Flagship Performance
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Oppo Find X5 Pro emerges as the stronger choice. Its Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (or Dimensity 9000 in China) offers a performance edge, coupled with significantly faster 80W wired and 50W wireless charging. While the X60t Pro+ remains a capable device, the Find X5 Pro’s advancements justify its position as the superior flagship.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo X60t Pro+ | Oppo Find X5 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 66 - Global |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 28, 38, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 18, 20, 25, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA - Global |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| - | 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 20, 28, 38, 41, 66, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA - China | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, June 28 | 2022, February 24 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, June 28 | Available. Released 2022, March 14 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, eco leather back, aluminum frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), ceramic back or eco leather back, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 158.6 x 73.4 x 9.1 mm (6.24 x 2.89 x 0.36 in) | 163.7 x 73.9 x 8.5 or 8.8 mm |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM |
| Weight | 191 g (6.74 oz) | 218 g or 195 g (6.88 oz) |
| - | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2376 pixels (~398 ppi density) | 1440 x 3216 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~525 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.56 inches, 104.6 cm2 (~89.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 108.4 cm2 (~89.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1300 nits (peak) | LTPO2 AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, BT.2020, 500 nits (typ), 800 nits (HBM), 1300 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-X1 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55 | Octa-core (1x3.00 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.50 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) - GlobalOcta-core (1x3.05 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.85 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) - China |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888 5G (5 nm) | Qualcomm SM8450 Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (4 nm) - GlobalMediatek Dimensity 9000 (4 nm) - China |
| GPU | Adreno 660 | Adreno 730 - GlobalMali-G710 MC10 - China |
| OS | Android 11, OriginOS 1.0 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 14, ColorOS 14 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| - | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, Zeiss optics, Zeiss T* lens coating, Pixel Shift, dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | Hasselblad Color Calibration, color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 50 MP, f/1.6, (wide), 1/1.31", 1.2µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/3.4, 125mm (periscope telephoto), 1/4.0", PDAF, OIS, 5x optical zoom 12 MP, f/2.0, 50mm (telephoto), PDAF, 2x optical zoom 48 MP, 114˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, gimbal OIS, PDAF | - |
| Single | - | 32 MP, f/2.4, 21mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.7, 25mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS (3-axis sensor-shift, 2-axis lens-shift) 13 MP, f/2.4, 52mm (telephoto), 1/3.4", 2x optical zoom, PDAF 50 MP, f/2.2, 15mm, 110˚ (ultrawide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF |
| Video | 8K@30fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS, HDR10+ | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps; gyro-EIS; HDR, 10‑bit video |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | Panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.5, 24mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | 32 MP, f/2.4, 21mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, NavIC | GPS (L1), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| - | Oppo Find X5 Pro Dimensity model has no MariSilicon X image chip, 5-axis OIS and Hasselblad’s color calibration | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 55W wired | 80W wired, PD, 50% in 12 min 50W wireless, 100% in 47 min 10W reverse wireless |
| Type | 4200 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Orange, Emperor Blue | Ceramic Black, Ceramic White, Blue (eco leather) |
| Models | V2056A | PFEM10, CPH2305, PFFM20 |
| Price | About 650 EUR | € 449.00 / $ 430.24 / £ 1,049.00 |
| SAR | 0.80 W/kg (head) 0.47 W/kg (body) | - |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 101h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -24.7 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 1012896 (v9) GeekBench: 3433 (v5.1) GFXBench: 44fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo X60t Pro+
- Potentially more compact design
- Proven Snapdragon 888 performance
- Established software experience
- Slower charging speeds (55W)
- Older chipset (Snapdragon 888)
- Likely lower peak display brightness
Oppo Find X5 Pro
- Faster Snapdragon 8 Gen 1/Dimensity 9000
- 80W wired and 50W wireless charging
- Brighter display (762 nits)
- More advanced image processing
- Potential for thermal throttling (Snapdragon 8 Gen 1)
- May be larger and heavier
- Potentially higher price
Display Comparison
The Oppo Find X5 Pro boasts a brighter display, reaching a measured 762 nits, compared to an unspecified brightness for the X60t Pro+. While both likely utilize high-quality AMOLED panels, the Find X5 Pro’s higher peak brightness translates to better visibility in direct sunlight. The Find X5 Pro’s ‘Infinite’ contrast ratio suggests a superior panel with deeper blacks. Details regarding refresh rate and PWM dimming are missing for both, but considering Oppo’s focus on display quality, the Find X5 Pro likely offers a more refined visual experience.
Camera Comparison
Both phones are advertised as having strong camera systems, but specific details are limited. Without sensor size or aperture information, a direct comparison is difficult. However, the Find X5 Pro’s image processing pipeline, leveraging the newer ISP within the Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 or Dimensity 9000, likely offers more advanced computational photography features. The X60t Pro+’s camera is still capable, but the Find X5 Pro benefits from the latest advancements in image processing and potentially larger sensors. We can assume both offer excellent photo and video capabilities, but the Find X5 Pro likely has an edge in challenging lighting conditions.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The vivo X60t Pro+ utilizes the Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 (5nm), while the Oppo Find X5 Pro features either the Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (4nm) or the MediaTek Dimensity 9000 (4nm) depending on the region. The 4nm process node of the Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 and Dimensity 9000 provides improved thermal efficiency and performance per watt compared to the 5nm Snapdragon 888. The Find X5 Pro’s CPU, with its Cortex-X2 core clocked at 3.00/3.05 GHz, offers a noticeable performance uplift over the X60t Pro+'s 2.84 GHz Cortex-X1. This translates to faster app loading, smoother multitasking, and improved gaming performance. The Find X5 Pro’s LPDDR5 RAM (spec not confirmed for X60t Pro+) further enhances responsiveness.
Battery Life
Both devices achieve an endurance rating of 101 hours, suggesting similar real-world battery life despite differing battery capacities (not specified for either). However, the Oppo Find X5 Pro’s charging capabilities are significantly superior. Its 80W wired charging can replenish the battery to 50% in just 12 minutes, and a full charge takes a reasonable amount of time. The addition of 50W wireless charging and 10W reverse wireless charging provides unparalleled convenience. The X60t Pro+’s 55W wired charging is respectable, but falls short of the Find X5 Pro’s speed. The Find X5 Pro’s charging ecosystem is a clear advantage for users who value quick top-ups.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo X60t Pro+ if you prioritize a slightly more compact form factor and are comfortable with a more established, though less cutting-edge, chipset. It’s a solid performer for everyday tasks and photography. Buy the Oppo Find X5 Pro if you demand the fastest possible charging speeds, a brighter display, and the latest processor generation for demanding applications like gaming and video editing. It’s geared towards power users.