vivo X60t Pro+ vs Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra: A Deep Dive into Snapdragon 888 Flagships
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing all-around capability, the Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra emerges as the stronger contender. Its superior charging speeds (67W wired and wireless) and slightly better endurance rating, coupled with a brighter display, provide a more convenient and robust daily experience. However, the X60t Pro+ remains a compelling option for those seeking a more streamlined software experience.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo X60t Pro+ | Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 42, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 28, 38, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE-A, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1x | 1, 3, 28, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA - China | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, June 28 | 2021, March 29 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, June 28 | Available. Released 2021, April 02 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, eco leather back, aluminum frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), ceramic back, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 158.6 x 73.4 x 9.1 mm (6.24 x 2.89 x 0.36 in) | 164.3 x 74.6 x 8.4 mm (6.47 x 2.94 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 191 g (6.74 oz) | 234 g (8.25 oz) |
| - | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2376 pixels (~398 ppi density) | 1440 x 3200 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~515 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.56 inches, 104.6 cm2 (~89.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.81 inches, 112.0 cm2 (~91.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1300 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, 900 nits (HBM), 1700 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-X1 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55 | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-X1 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888 5G (5 nm) | Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888 5G (5 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 660 | Adreno 660 |
| OS | Android 11, OriginOS 1.0 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 13, MIUI 14 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Zeiss optics, Zeiss T* lens coating, Pixel Shift, dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama, 1.1” AMOLED selfie display |
| Quad | 50 MP, f/1.6, (wide), 1/1.31", 1.2µm, dual pixel PDAF, Laser AF, OIS 8 MP, f/3.4, 125mm (periscope telephoto), 1/4.0", PDAF, OIS, 5x optical zoom 12 MP, f/2.0, 50mm (telephoto), PDAF, 2x optical zoom 48 MP, 114˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, gimbal OIS, PDAF | - |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.5, 24mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | 20 MP, f/2.2, 27mm (wide), 1/3.4", 0.8µm |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/2.0, 24mm (wide), 1/1.12", 1.4µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 48 MP, f/4.1, 120mm (periscope telephoto), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS, 5x optical zoom 48 MP, f/2.2, 12mm, 128˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF |
| Video | 8K@30fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS, HDR10+ | 8K@24fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240/960/1920fps, gyro-EIS, HDR10+ rec. |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.5, 24mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | 20 MP, f/2.2, 27mm (wide), 1/3.4", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/60fps, 720p@120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | - | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 32-bit/192kHz audio | 24-bit/192kHz audio Tuned by Harman Kardon | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, NavIC | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct, DLNA |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass, color spectrum | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| Virtual proximity sensing | Virtual proximity sensing | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 55W wired | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC4, 100% in 36 min 67W wireless, 100% in 39 min 10W reverse wireless |
| Type | Li-Po 4200 mAh, non-removable | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Orange, Emperor Blue | Ceramic White (Cosmic White), Ceramic Black (Cosmic Black) |
| Models | V2056A | M2102K1G, M2102K1C |
| Price | About 650 EUR | About 1500 EUR |
| SAR | 0.80 W/kg (head) 0.47 W/kg (body) | 1.08 W/kg (head) 0.81 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.55 W/kg (head) 0.99 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 95h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -24.3 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 688720 (v8) GeekBench: 3191 (v5.1) GFXBench: 33fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo X60t Pro+
- Potentially cleaner software experience (vivo's Funtouch OS)
- May have a more compact design
- 55W fast charging is still respectable
- Slower charging compared to Mi 11 Ultra
- Less detailed display specifications
- Camera system details are limited
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra
- 67W wired and wireless charging – industry leading
- Brighter display for outdoor visibility
- Stronger thermal management potential due to larger chassis
- Potentially more bloated software (Xiaomi's MIUI)
- Larger and heavier design
- Higher price point (potentially)
Display Comparison
The Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra boasts a significantly brighter display, peaking at 943 nits measured, compared to an unspecified brightness for the X60t Pro+. This difference is crucial for outdoor visibility. While both likely utilize high-refresh-rate AMOLED panels, the Mi 11 Ultra’s infinite (nominal) contrast ratio suggests a superior viewing experience with deeper blacks. The X60t Pro+’s display specifications are less detailed, making a direct comparison of color accuracy and panel technology difficult, but it’s reasonable to assume both offer excellent quality for their respective price points.
Camera Comparison
Both devices are marketed as camera-centric, but details are limited. The Mi 11 Ultra’s camera system is known for its large main sensor and advanced video capabilities. While specific sensor sizes and apertures aren’t provided for either phone, the Mi 11 Ultra’s reputation suggests a more sophisticated image processing pipeline and potentially better low-light performance. The X60t Pro+ likely focuses on a balanced camera experience, but without detailed specifications, it’s difficult to assess its strengths relative to the Mi 11 Ultra. We can assume both offer capable video recording, but the Mi 11 Ultra’s larger sensor and advanced features likely give it an edge.
Performance
Both the vivo X60t Pro+ and Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra are powered by the Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888 5G (5 nm) chipset, featuring the same Octa-core CPU configuration (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-X1, 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A78, and 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55). This means raw processing power will be nearly identical. However, the Mi 11 Ultra’s larger chassis potentially allows for a more robust cooling solution, mitigating potential thermal throttling during sustained heavy workloads like gaming. While RAM specifications aren’t provided, both likely utilize LPDDR5 for fast memory access.
Battery Life
The Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra shines in the battery department with its impressive charging capabilities. It supports 67W wired charging, achieving a 100% charge in just 36 minutes, and a remarkable 67W wireless charging, taking 39 minutes for a full charge. It also offers 10W reverse wireless charging. The vivo X60t Pro+ is limited to 55W wired charging, meaning a slower charging time. Both phones share an endurance rating of 95 hours, suggesting similar real-world battery life despite potential differences in battery capacity. The Mi 11 Ultra’s faster charging significantly reduces downtime, making it ideal for users who frequently need to top up their battery.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo X60t Pro+ if you prioritize a potentially cleaner software experience and a more compact form factor (assuming similar dimensions to the X60 Pro). Buy the Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra if you demand the fastest possible charging – both wired and wireless – and value a brighter, more visible display, especially in outdoor conditions. The Mi 11 Ultra also caters to users who heavily rely on video recording and appreciate its advanced camera features.