vivo X60t Pro+ vs iQOO Neo 6: A Detailed Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The iQOO Neo 6 offers exceptional value with its blazing-fast 80W charging and impressive battery life. The X60t Pro+ boasts a slightly more powerful Snapdragon 888 chipset, but the Neo 6's overall package, especially considering its price, makes it a strong contender for most users.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo X60t Pro+ | vivo iQOO Neo 6 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 28, 38, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA | 1, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE-A, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1x | - | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, June 28 | 2022, May 31 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, June 28 | Available. Released 2022, May 31 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, eco leather back, aluminum frame | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 158.6 x 73.4 x 9.1 mm (6.24 x 2.89 x 0.36 in) | 163 x 76.2 x 8.5 mm (6.42 x 3.00 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 191 g (6.74 oz) | 190 g (6.70 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2376 pixels (~398 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~398 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.56 inches, 104.6 cm2 (~89.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.62 inches, 105.8 cm2 (~85.2% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1300 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 800 nits (HBM), 1300 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-X1 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55 | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Kryo 585 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 585 & 4x1.80 GHz Kryo 585) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888 5G (5 nm) | Qualcomm SM8250-AC Snapdragon 870 5G (7 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 660 | Adreno 650 |
| OS | Android 11, OriginOS 1.0 | Android 12, Funtouch 12 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Zeiss optics, Zeiss T* lens coating, Pixel Shift, dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 50 MP, f/1.6, (wide), 1/1.31", 1.2µm, dual pixel PDAF, Laser AF, OIS 8 MP, f/3.4, 125mm (periscope telephoto), 1/4.0", PDAF, OIS, 5x optical zoom 12 MP, f/2.0, 50mm (telephoto), PDAF, 2x optical zoom 48 MP, 114˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, gimbal OIS, PDAF | - |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.5, 24mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/3.1", 1.0µm |
| Triple | - | 64 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.72", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 116˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 8K@30fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS, HDR10+ | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.5, 24mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/3.1", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | - | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 32-bit/192kHz audio | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, aptX Lossless |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, NavIC | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass, color spectrum | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Virtual proximity sensing | - | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 55W wired | 80W wired, 50% in 12 min, 100% in 32 min |
| Type | Li-Po 4200 mAh, non-removable | 4700 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Orange, Emperor Blue | Dark Nova, Cyber Rage |
| Models | V2056A | I2126 |
| Price | About 650 EUR | About 360 EUR |
| SAR | 0.80 W/kg (head) 0.47 W/kg (body) | - |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 97h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -25.0 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 627246 (v8), 730223 (v9) GeekBench: 3076 (v5.1) GFXBench: 50fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo X60t Pro+
- More powerful Snapdragon 888 chipset
- Potentially better camera quality
- Premium build quality (assumed)
- Slower charging speed
- Likely higher price
- Missing specific camera details
vivo iQOO Neo 6
- Blazing-fast 80W charging
- Excellent battery life
- High brightness display
- Exceptional value
- Slightly less powerful chipset
- Potentially less refined camera
- Marketing 'infinite' contrast ratio
Display Comparison
Both phones feature excellent displays, but the iQOO Neo 6's 772 nits peak brightness gives it a slight edge in outdoor visibility. The Neo 6's 'infinite' contrast ratio is a marketing term, but suggests deep blacks. The X60t Pro+ likely has more accurate color calibration, but the difference is subtle. Both offer smooth scrolling thanks to high refresh rates (likely 120Hz).
Camera Comparison
The X60t Pro+ likely has a more advanced camera system, potentially with a larger sensor and better image processing. While specific camera specs are missing, the Snapdragon 888 generally supports more advanced camera features. The iQOO Neo 6's camera is still very good, producing vibrant and detailed photos, but may not match the X60t Pro+'s overall quality.
Performance
The X60t Pro+’s Snapdragon 888 holds a performance advantage over the iQOO Neo 6’s Snapdragon 870. While the 870 is still a very capable chip, the 888 offers more headroom for demanding games and multitasking. However, vivo’s software optimization on both devices ensures a fluid user experience.
Battery Life
The iQOO Neo 6 absolutely dominates in this category. Its 80W charging is incredibly fast, reaching 50% in just 12 minutes and 100% in 32 minutes. The X60t Pro+'s 55W charging is still respectable, but significantly slower. Both phones boast impressive endurance ratings (97h), suggesting excellent battery optimization.
Buying Guide
Who should buy the vivo X60t Pro+? Users prioritizing raw processing power and a potentially slightly better camera experience (though both are good) and are willing to pay a premium. Who should buy the vivo iQOO Neo 6? Gamers, power users, and anyone seeking incredible charging speeds and long battery life without breaking the bank.