vivo X60t Pro+ vs Oppo Find X3 Pro: A Detailed Flagship Comparison
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Oppo Find X3 Pro emerges as the slightly better choice. Its 65W wired and 30W wireless charging, coupled with an 81-hour endurance rating, provides a significant advantage in daily usability. While the X60t Pro+ is a capable device, the Find X3 Pro’s charging and battery life offer a more convenient and reliable experience.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo X60t Pro+ | Oppo Find X3 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 28, 38, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE-A, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1x | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA - China | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, June 28 | 2021, March 11 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, June 28 | Available. Released 2021, March 19 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, eco leather back, aluminum frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 158.6 x 73.4 x 9.1 mm (6.24 x 2.89 x 0.36 in) | 163.6 x 74 x 8.3 mm (6.44 x 2.91 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) | Nano-SIM + eSIM |
| Weight | 191 g (6.74 oz) | 193 g (6.81 oz) |
| - | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2376 pixels (~398 ppi density) | 1440 x 3216 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~525 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.56 inches, 104.6 cm2 (~89.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 108.4 cm2 (~89.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1300 nits (peak) | LTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, BT.2020, 500 nits (typ), 1300 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-X1 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55 | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-X1 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888 5G (5 nm) | Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888 5G (5 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 660 | Adreno 660 |
| OS | Android 11, OriginOS 1.0 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 14, ColorOS 14 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Zeiss optics, Zeiss T* lens coating, Pixel Shift, dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 50 MP, f/1.6, (wide), 1/1.31", 1.2µm, dual pixel PDAF, Laser AF, OIS 8 MP, f/3.4, 125mm (periscope telephoto), 1/4.0", PDAF, OIS, 5x optical zoom 12 MP, f/2.0, 50mm (telephoto), PDAF, 2x optical zoom 48 MP, 114˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, gimbal OIS, PDAF | 50 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.4, 52mm (telephoto), 1/3.4", 1.0µm, 2x optical zoom, PDAF 50 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 110˚ (ultrawide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF 3 MP, f/3.0, (microscope), AF, ring flash, 60x magnification |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.5, 24mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | - |
| Video | 8K@30fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS, HDR10+ | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps; gyro-EIS; HDR, 10‑bit video |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | Panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.5, 24mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | 32 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | - | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 32-bit/192kHz audio | - | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, NavIC | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass, color spectrum | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Virtual proximity sensing | - | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 55W wired | 65W wired, PD, 40% in 10 min 30W wireless, 100% in 80 min 10W reverse wireless |
| Type | Li-Po 4200 mAh, non-removable | Li-Po 4500 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Orange, Emperor Blue | Gloss Black, Blue, White, Cosmic Mocha, Mars Edition, Photographer Edition |
| Models | V2056A | CPH2173, PEEM00, OPG03 |
| Price | About 650 EUR | About 200 EUR |
| SAR | 0.80 W/kg (head) 0.47 W/kg (body) | - |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 81h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -25.4 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 656467 (v8) GeekBench: 3316 (v5.1) GFXBench: 33fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo X60t Pro+
- Potentially lower price point
- Snapdragon 888 performance
- Flagship-level build quality
- Slower charging speeds (55W)
- Unknown battery endurance
- Limited charging ecosystem
Oppo Find X3 Pro
- 65W wired and 30W wireless charging
- 81-hour battery endurance rating
- 10W reverse wireless charging
- Potentially higher price
- Snapdragon 888 throttling potential
- Large form factor
Display Comparison
Both devices utilize high-end displays, but the Oppo Find X3 Pro boasts a measured peak brightness of 774 nits, suggesting a potentially more visible screen in direct sunlight. While both likely employ AMOLED panels, the Find X3 Pro’s ‘Infinite’ contrast ratio (nominal) indicates a superior black level and overall image quality. Details regarding refresh rate and PWM dimming are missing, but considering the era, both likely support at least 120Hz refresh rates. The Find X3 Pro’s brightness advantage is a key differentiator for outdoor use.
Camera Comparison
Both phones are advertised as having strong photo and video capabilities, but specific sensor details are lacking. Without knowing sensor sizes, apertures, or OIS implementation, a definitive camera comparison is difficult. However, the market positioning of the Find X3 Pro suggests a greater emphasis on camera innovation, potentially including more advanced image processing algorithms. The absence of details on secondary cameras (ultrawide, telephoto) makes a comprehensive assessment impossible, but focusing on the main sensor performance is crucial.
Performance
Both the vivo X60t Pro+ and the Oppo Find X3 Pro are equipped with the Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888 5G (5 nm) chipset, featuring an octa-core CPU configuration with 1x2.84 GHz Cortex-X1, 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A78, and 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. This means raw processing power will be nearly identical. However, thermal management is where differences could emerge. The Find X3 Pro’s larger chassis *may* offer slightly better heat dissipation, potentially mitigating Snapdragon 888’s known throttling tendencies during sustained workloads. RAM specifications are not provided, but both likely utilize LPDDR5 for fast memory access.
Battery Life
The Oppo Find X3 Pro holds a clear advantage in battery and charging. Its 81-hour endurance rating, while a standardized test, indicates superior real-world battery life compared to the X60t Pro+ (whose battery capacity is unknown). Furthermore, the Find X3 Pro supports 65W wired charging, achieving 40% charge in just 10 minutes, and 30W wireless charging, reaching 100% in 80 minutes. It also includes 10W reverse wireless charging. The X60t Pro+ is limited to 55W wired charging, making the Find X3 Pro significantly faster for topping up the battery.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo X60t Pro+ if you prioritize a potentially lower price point and are comfortable with a slightly slower charging experience. Buy the Oppo Find X3 Pro if you value faster charging speeds (both wired and wireless), longer battery life, and a more comprehensive charging ecosystem including reverse wireless charging. Both phones deliver flagship performance, but the Find X3 Pro caters to users who demand maximum convenience.