vivo X60t Pro+ vs OnePlus 9 Pro: A Deep Dive into Snapdragon 888 Flagships
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the OnePlus 9 Pro is the better choice. Its 65W wired charging, coupled with 50W wireless and reverse wireless capabilities, significantly outperforms the vivo X60t Pro+'s 55W wired charging. Both offer similar performance, but the OnePlus 9 Pro’s charging ecosystem provides greater convenience.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo X60t Pro+ | OnePlus 9 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1800 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - EU |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 28, 38, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 78 SA/NSA - EU |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE-A, 5G | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat20 2000/200 Mbps, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1x | 1, 3, 28, 41, 78, 79 SA/NSA - CN | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, June 28 | 2021, March 23 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, June 28 | Available. Released 2021, March 30 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, eco leather back, aluminum frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 158.6 x 73.4 x 9.1 mm (6.24 x 2.89 x 0.36 in) | 163.2 x 73.6 x 8.7 mm (6.43 x 2.90 x 0.34 in) |
| SIM | Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 191 g (6.74 oz) | 197 g (6.95 oz) |
| - | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2376 pixels (~398 ppi density) | 1440 x 3216 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~525 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.56 inches, 104.6 cm2 (~89.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 108.4 cm2 (~90.3% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1300 nits (peak) | LTPO Fluid2 AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1300 nits (peak) |
| - | Always-on display | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-X1 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55 | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-X1 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55 |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888 5G (5 nm) | Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888 5G (5 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 660 | Adreno 660 |
| OS | Android 11, OriginOS 1.0 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 14, OxygenOS 14 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Zeiss optics, Zeiss T* lens coating, Pixel Shift, dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, Hasselblad Color Calibration, dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 50 MP, f/1.6, (wide), 1/1.31", 1.2µm, dual pixel PDAF, Laser AF, OIS 8 MP, f/3.4, 125mm (periscope telephoto), 1/4.0", PDAF, OIS, 5x optical zoom 12 MP, f/2.0, 50mm (telephoto), PDAF, 2x optical zoom 48 MP, 114˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, gimbal OIS, PDAF | 48 MP, f/1.8, 23mm (wide), 1/1.43", 1.12µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.4, 77mm (telephoto), 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS, 3.3x optical zoom 50 MP, f/2.2, 14mm (ultrawide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, AF 2 MP, f/2.4, (monochrome) |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.5, 24mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | 16 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 8K@30fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS, HDR10+ | 8K@30fps, 4K@30/60/120fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps, Auto HDR, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.5, 24mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | 16 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | - | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 32-bit/192kHz audio | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, NavIC | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1), GALILEO (E1+E5a) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct, DLNA |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass, color spectrum | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Virtual proximity sensing | - | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 55W wired | 65W wired, PD, 100% in 29 min 50W wireless, 100% in 43 min 5W reverse wireless |
| Type | Li-Po 4200 mAh, non-removable | Li-Po 4500 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Orange, Emperor Blue | Morning Mist, Forest Green, Stellar Black |
| Models | V2056A | LE2121, LE2125, LE2123, LE2120, LE2127 |
| Price | About 650 EUR | € 246.17 / $ 264.95 / £ 287.00 |
| SAR | 0.80 W/kg (head) 0.47 W/kg (body) | - |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 86h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Loudspeaker | - | -24.1 LUFS (Very good) |
vivo X60t Pro+
- Potentially lower price point
- Snapdragon 888 performance
- Comparable battery endurance
- Slower charging speeds (55W wired only)
- Lack of wireless charging
- Limited camera details available
OnePlus 9 Pro
- Faster 65W wired charging
- 50W wireless and 5W reverse wireless charging
- Brighter display (859 nits)
- Potentially higher price
- Snapdragon 888 can generate heat
- Software bloat (typical of OnePlus)
Display Comparison
The OnePlus 9 Pro boasts a measured peak brightness of 859 nits, suggesting a more visible display in direct sunlight compared to the unmeasured brightness of the X60t Pro+. While both likely utilize high-refresh-rate AMOLED panels, the OnePlus 9 Pro’s brightness advantage is a tangible benefit for outdoor use. Details regarding PWM dimming rates are absent, but this is a crucial factor for users sensitive to flicker, and further investigation would be needed to determine which device is preferable in this regard.
Camera Comparison
Both devices are listed as having 'Photo / Video' capabilities, but lack specific details regarding sensor size, aperture, or optical image stabilization (OIS). Without this information, a direct camera comparison is impossible. However, the market positioning of both phones suggests a focus on image quality. The OnePlus 9 Pro’s collaboration with Hasselblad is a notable marketing point, implying a focus on color science and image processing. The absence of details on the X60t Pro+’s camera system makes it difficult to assess its capabilities relative to the OnePlus 9 Pro.
Performance
Both the vivo X60t Pro+ and OnePlus 9 Pro are equipped with the Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888 5G (5 nm) chipset, featuring an octa-core CPU configuration identical in clock speeds (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-X1, 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A78, 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55). This means raw processing power will be nearly indistinguishable between the two. However, thermal management – a critical factor for sustained performance – is not specified for either device. The Snapdragon 888 is known to generate heat, and the effectiveness of each phone’s cooling solution will determine how well it maintains peak performance during extended gaming or demanding tasks. RAM specifications are also missing, but both are expected to utilize LPDDR5 for fast memory access.
Battery Life
Both the vivo X60t Pro+ and OnePlus 9 Pro achieve an endurance rating of 86h, indicating comparable battery life under similar usage conditions. However, the charging capabilities are where they significantly diverge. The OnePlus 9 Pro supports 65W wired charging, achieving a 100% charge in just 29 minutes, alongside 50W wireless charging (43 minutes) and 5W reverse wireless charging. The vivo X60t Pro+ is limited to 55W wired charging, lacking wireless charging options. This makes the OnePlus 9 Pro far more convenient for users who frequently need to top up their battery quickly or utilize wireless charging.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo X60t Pro+ if you prioritize a potentially lower price point and are comfortable with a more limited charging ecosystem. Buy the OnePlus 9 Pro if you value faster, more versatile charging options – including wireless – and a slightly more refined software experience. Both are excellent performers, but the OnePlus 9 Pro offers a more complete package for the average power user.