vivo X60t Pro+ vs Google Pixel 6 Pro: A Head-to-Head Flagship Battle
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing raw performance and fast charging, the vivo X60t Pro+ is the clear winner. However, the Google Pixel 6 Pro’s superior display brightness, unique software features, and wireless charging capabilities make it a compelling choice for those valuing a holistic user experience.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo X60t Pro+ | Google Pixel 6 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 46, 48, 66, 71 - GLUOG, G8VOU |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 28, 38, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 14, 20, 25, 28, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71, 77, 78, 257, 258, 260, 261 SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave - G8VOU |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE-A, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1x | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 14, 20, 25, 28, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - GLUOG | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, June 28 | 2021, October 19 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, June 28 | Available. Released 2021, October 28 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, eco leather back, aluminum frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), glass back (Gorilla Glass Victus), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 158.6 x 73.4 x 9.1 mm (6.24 x 2.89 x 0.36 in) | 163.9 x 75.9 x 8.9 mm (6.45 x 2.99 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) | Nano-SIM + eSIM |
| Weight | 191 g (6.74 oz) | 210 g (7.41 oz) |
| - | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2376 pixels (~398 ppi density) | 1440 x 3120 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~512 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.56 inches, 104.6 cm2 (~89.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 110.6 cm2 (~88.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1300 nits (peak) | LTPO AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+ |
| - | Always-on display | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-X1 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55 | Octa-core (2x2.80 GHz Cortex-X1 & 2x2.25 GHz Cortex-A76 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888 5G (5 nm) | Google Tensor (5 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 660 | Mali-G78 MP20 |
| OS | Android 11, OriginOS 1.0 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 15, up to 5 major Android upgrades |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Zeiss optics, Zeiss T* lens coating, Pixel Shift, dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | Laser AF, Dual-LED flash, Pixel Shift, Auto-HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 50 MP, f/1.6, (wide), 1/1.31", 1.2µm, dual pixel PDAF, Laser AF, OIS 8 MP, f/3.4, 125mm (periscope telephoto), 1/4.0", PDAF, OIS, 5x optical zoom 12 MP, f/2.0, 50mm (telephoto), PDAF, 2x optical zoom 48 MP, 114˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, gimbal OIS, PDAF | - |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.5, 24mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | 11.1 MP, f/2.2, 20mm (ultrawide), 1.22µm |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.9, 25mm (wide), 1/1.31", 1.2µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 48 MP, f/3.5, 104mm (periscope telephoto), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS, 4x optical zoom 12 MP, f/2.2, 17mm, 114˚ (ultrawide), 1.25µm |
| Video | 8K@30fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS, HDR10+ | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps; gyro-EIS, OIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.5, 24mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | 11.1 MP, f/2.2, 20mm (ultrawide), 1.22µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | - | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 32-bit/192kHz audio | - | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, NavIC | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.1 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass, color spectrum | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Virtual proximity sensing | Ultra Wideband (UWB) support | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 55W wired | 23W wired, PD3.0, 50% in 30 min 23W wireless Reverse wireless |
| Type | Li-Po 4200 mAh, non-removable | Li-Ion 5003 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Orange, Emperor Blue | Cloudy White, Sorta Sunny, Stormy Black |
| Models | V2056A | GLUOG, G8VOU, GF5KQ |
| Price | About 650 EUR | € 199.99 / $ 204.99 / £ 275.00 / ₹ 29,699 |
| SAR | 0.80 W/kg (head) 0.47 W/kg (body) | - |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 84h |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 585485 (v8), 719815 (v9) GeekBench: 2831 (v5.1) GFXBench: 39 fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo X60t Pro+
- Faster 55W wired charging
- Potentially superior raw gaming performance (Snapdragon 888)
- Strong CPU performance with Cortex-X1 core
- Lacks wireless charging
- Limited camera information for detailed comparison
- Software support may be less consistent than Pixel
Google Pixel 6 Pro
- Brighter and more color-accurate display
- Google’s Tensor chip excels in AI and image processing
- Wireless and reverse wireless charging
- Slower 23W wired charging
- Potential for thermal throttling under sustained load
- Tensor chip may not match Snapdragon 888 in raw gaming
Display Comparison
The Google Pixel 6 Pro boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 846 nits, compared to an unspecified peak brightness for the X60t Pro+. While the X60t Pro+ likely has a high-quality AMOLED panel, the Pixel 6 Pro’s higher brightness translates to better outdoor visibility. The Pixel 6 Pro’s ‘infinite’ contrast ratio (nominal) suggests a superior black level, enhancing visual depth. Both devices likely employ high refresh rate panels, but the Pixel 6 Pro’s LTPO technology dynamically adjusts the refresh rate for improved power efficiency, a feature not confirmed for the X60t Pro+.
Camera Comparison
Detailed camera specs for the X60t Pro+ are unavailable, but its 'Pro+' designation suggests a high-end camera system. The Pixel 6 Pro’s camera is renowned for its computational photography prowess, powered by the Tensor chip’s image signal processor. While sensor sizes aren’t provided, the Pixel 6 Pro’s image processing excels in dynamic range and low-light performance. The X60t Pro+ likely relies more on hardware capabilities, while the Pixel 6 Pro leans heavily on software algorithms. The absence of detailed camera information for the X60t Pro+ makes a direct comparison challenging, but the Pixel 6 Pro’s consistent image quality and innovative features give it an edge.
Performance
Both phones utilize a 5nm process, but the chipsets differ significantly. The vivo X60t Pro+ features the Qualcomm Snapdragon 888, with a prime Cortex-X1 core clocked at 2.84 GHz. The Pixel 6 Pro employs Google’s Tensor chip, featuring a similar Cortex-X1 configuration at 2.80 GHz. While clock speeds are close, the Tensor chip prioritizes AI and machine learning tasks, impacting real-world performance differently. The Snapdragon 888 is known for its raw CPU and GPU power, making the X60t Pro+ a better choice for demanding games. However, the Tensor’s architecture may offer advantages in tasks like image processing and voice recognition. Both utilize LPDDR5 RAM, but the speed isn't specified, potentially impacting multitasking performance.
Battery Life
Both devices achieve an endurance rating of 84 hours, suggesting comparable battery life despite differing charging capabilities. The Pixel 6 Pro offers 23W wired charging with PD3.0, reaching 50% in 30 minutes, alongside 23W wireless and reverse wireless charging. The X60t Pro+ boasts significantly faster 55W wired charging, promising a quicker full charge. While the Pixel 6 Pro’s wireless charging adds convenience, the X60t Pro+’s faster wired charging is ideal for users who prioritize speed. The similar endurance ratings suggest that despite the charging speed difference, both phones offer all-day battery life under typical usage.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo X60t Pro+ if you need uncompromising gaming performance, rapid 55W wired charging, and a phone that excels at demanding tasks. Buy the Google Pixel 6 Pro if you prefer a brighter, more color-accurate display, Google’s exclusive software features like Magic Eraser, and the convenience of wireless charging and reverse wireless charging.