vivo X60s vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 4G: A Detailed Comparison
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Redmi Note 12 Pro 4G offers significantly faster charging and a more modern design, while the X60s boasts a more powerful chipset and potentially better camera image processing. For value and charging speed, the Redmi wins; for raw performance, the X60s takes the lead.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo X60s | Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 4G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 28, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA | - |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| CDMA2000 1x | - | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, May 24 | 2023, March 03 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, May 24 | Available. Released 2023, April 11 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | 158.6 x 73.2 x 7.6 mm (6.24 x 2.88 x 0.30 in) | 164.2 x 76.1 x 8.1 mm (6.46 x 3.00 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 176 g (6.21 oz) | 201.8 g (7.13 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2376 pixels (~398 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.56 inches, 104.6 cm2 (~90.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+ | AMOLED, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, 700 nits (HBM), 1100 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.8 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 470 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 470 Silver) |
| Chipset | Exynos 1080 (5 nm) | Qualcomm SM7150 Snapdragon 732G (8 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G78 MP10 | Adreno 618 |
| OS | Android 11, OriginOS 1.0 | Android 11, MIUI 13 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | UFS 2.2 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Zeiss optics, color spectrum sensor, Pixel Shift, LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 48 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.5, 50mm (telephoto), 1/2.8", 0.8µm, PDAF, 2x optical zoom 13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚, 16mm (ultrawide) | 108 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF 8 MP, 120˚, (ultrawide) 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.5, 24mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | - |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | - |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.5, 24mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | 16 MP, f/2.4, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | Yes |
| 35mm jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | No | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| Virtual proximity sensing | - | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 33W wired | 67W wired |
| Type | 4200 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Gray, Aurora, White | Star Blue, Graphite Gray, Polar White, Ice blue |
| Models | V2059A | 2209116AG, 2209116AG |
| Price | About 460 EUR | About 150 EUR |
vivo X60s
- More powerful chipset
- Potentially better camera image processing
- Premium build quality (likely)
- Good display quality
- Slower charging speed
- Older design
- May be harder to find new
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 4G
- Faster 67W charging
- Modern design
- Good value for money
- High-resolution main camera
- Less powerful chipset
- Potentially less refined camera processing
- 8nm process less efficient
Display Comparison
The Redmi Note 12 Pro 4G likely features a more modern AMOLED display with a higher refresh rate (typically 120Hz), offering smoother scrolling and vibrant colors. The X60s likely has an OLED display, but potentially a lower refresh rate (60Hz). Screen size and resolution are likely similar, around 6.6 inches and FHD+ respectively.
Camera Comparison
Both phones offer capable camera systems. The X60s is expected to have superior image processing due to the Exynos chipset, potentially resulting in better dynamic range and low-light performance. The Redmi Note 12 Pro 4G often features a high-resolution main sensor (e.g., 108MP) which can capture detailed images, but image quality is heavily dependent on software processing.
Performance
The vivo X60s' Exynos 1080 chipset is considerably more powerful than the Snapdragon 732G in the Redmi Note 12 Pro 4G. Expect noticeably faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and better gaming performance on the X60s. The Snapdragon 732G is still capable for everyday tasks, but struggles with demanding games.
Battery Life
The Redmi Note 12 Pro 4G's 67W wired charging is a significant advantage, allowing for incredibly fast charging times. The X60s' 33W charging is slower. Battery capacity is likely similar, around 4500-5000 mAh on both devices, so real-world battery life may be comparable despite the charging speed difference.
Buying Guide
The vivo X60s is ideal for users prioritizing performance and camera quality, especially those who enjoy mobile gaming or photography. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 4G is a great choice for budget-conscious buyers who value fast charging and a sleek design, and don't need the absolute top-tier performance.