vivo X60s vs Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite: A Detailed Comparison of Mid-Range Powerhouses
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing raw performance and a more robust chipset, the vivo X60s emerges as the winner. Its Exynos 1080 offers a noticeable advantage in demanding tasks. However, the Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite’s excellent display and lighter build make it a strong contender for those valuing portability and media consumption.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo X60s | Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 28, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA | - |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| CDMA2000 1x | - | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, May 24 | 2021, March 29 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, May 24 | Available. Released 2021, April 16 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | 158.6 x 73.2 x 7.6 mm (6.24 x 2.88 x 0.30 in) | 160.5 x 75.7 x 6.8 mm (6.32 x 2.98 x 0.27 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 176 g (6.21 oz) | 157 g (5.54 oz) |
| - | IP53, dust and splash resistant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2376 pixels (~398 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~402 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.56 inches, 104.6 cm2 (~90.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.55 inches, 103.6 cm2 (~85.3% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+ | AMOLED, 1B colors, HDR10, 90Hz, 500 nits (typ), 800 nits |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.8 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.3 GHz Kryo 470 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 470 Silver) |
| Chipset | Exynos 1080 (5 nm) | Qualcomm SM7150 Snapdragon 732G (8 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G78 MP10 | Adreno 618 |
| OS | Android 11, OriginOS 1.0 | Android 11, MIUI 12 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | UFS 2.2 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Zeiss optics, color spectrum sensor, Pixel Shift, LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 48 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.5, 50mm (telephoto), 1/2.8", 0.8µm, PDAF, 2x optical zoom 13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚, 16mm (ultrawide) | - |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.5, 24mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | - |
| Triple | - | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.97", 0.7µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 5 MP (macro), AF |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps; gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.5, 24mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, 720p@120fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with dual speakers |
| - | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| Virtual proximity sensing | Virtual proximity sensing | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 33W wired | 33W wired |
| Type | 4200 mAh | Li-Po 4250 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Gray, Aurora, White | Boba Black (Vinyl Black), Peach Pink (Tuscany Coral), Bubblegum Blue (Jazz Blue) |
| Models | V2059A | M2101K9AG, M2101K9AI |
| Price | About 460 EUR | £ 221.40 / € 106.34 |
| SAR | - | 1.07 W/kg (head) 0.82 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.60 W/kg (head) 0.95 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 100h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -24.2 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 290172 (v8), 294251 (v9) GeekBench: 1796 (v5.1) GFXBench: 17fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo X60s
- More powerful Exynos 1080 chipset
- Potentially better thermal management due to 5nm process
- Likely superior image processing capabilities
- Battery life may be slightly lower due to chipset power draw
- Weight and dimensions unknown, potentially heavier than Mi 11 Lite
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite
- Brighter display for better outdoor visibility
- Lighter and more comfortable to hold
- Efficient Snapdragon 732G chipset
- Less powerful chipset compared to Exynos 1080
- May struggle with demanding games and applications
- Missing high refresh rate display
Display Comparison
The Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite boasts a brighter display, reaching a measured 826 nits, which translates to better visibility under direct sunlight compared to the X60s (brightness data unavailable). While the X60s’ panel specifics are unknown, the Mi 11 Lite’s ‘Infinite’ contrast ratio (nominal) suggests a strong VA-type panel. Both phones lack high refresh rate displays, a notable omission in this price bracket. The Mi 11 Lite’s lighter weight (158g vs X60s weight unavailable) contributes to a more comfortable viewing experience during extended use.
Camera Comparison
Both phones offer photo and video capabilities, but detailed sensor information is limited. Without specifics, it’s difficult to make a definitive judgment. However, the X60s’ chipset likely provides more processing power for image signal processing (ISP), potentially resulting in better low-light performance and faster image capture. The Mi 11 Lite’s camera system is likely tuned for vibrant, social media-ready images, while the X60s may lean towards a more natural color profile. The presence of OIS on either device is unknown, a crucial factor for video stabilization.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The vivo X60s’ Exynos 1080 (5nm) features a more powerful CPU configuration – a 1x2.8 GHz Cortex-A78, 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78, and 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 – compared to the Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite’s Snapdragon 732G (8nm) with its 2x2.3 GHz Kryo 470 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 470 Silver. The 5nm fabrication process of the Exynos 1080 should offer better power efficiency and thermal performance, potentially leading to sustained performance during intensive tasks. However, the Snapdragon 732G is a well-optimized chip known for its stability and efficiency. The X60s likely has an edge in GPU performance, benefiting gamers and users of graphically intensive applications.
Battery Life
Both the vivo X60s and Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite support 33W wired charging, offering comparable charging speeds – likely around 60-70 minutes for a full charge. Both phones have an endurance rating of 100h, suggesting similar battery life under typical usage. However, the Exynos 1080’s potentially higher power consumption could slightly impact the X60s’ real-world battery performance, especially during gaming or video streaming.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo X60s if you need a phone capable of handling demanding games and applications, and appreciate a more powerful processor. Buy the Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite if you prioritize a lightweight design, a bright and vibrant display for media consumption, and a more balanced overall experience without pushing for absolute peak performance.