vivo X60s vs Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G: Which Mid-Range 5G Phone Reigns Supreme?
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G emerges as the more practical choice. Its Snapdragon 778G offers a strong balance of performance and efficiency, coupled with a brighter display and comparable battery life, all at a potentially lower price point. While the X60s boasts a slightly faster CPU on paper, the A52s 5G delivers a more consistently smooth experience.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo X60s | Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 28, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat18 1200/150 Mbps, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1x | - | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, May 24 | 2021, August 17 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, May 24 | Available. Released 2021, September 01 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic back |
| Dimensions | 158.6 x 73.2 x 7.6 mm (6.24 x 2.88 x 0.30 in) | 159.9 x 75.1 x 8.4 mm (6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 176 g (6.21 oz) | 189 g (6.67 oz) |
| - | IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2376 pixels (~398 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~405 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.56 inches, 104.6 cm2 (~90.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+ | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, 800 nits (HBM) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.8 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Exynos 1080 (5 nm) | Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G78 MP10 | Adreno 642L |
| OS | Android 11, OriginOS 1.0 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 14, One UI 6 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | - | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Zeiss optics, color spectrum sensor, Pixel Shift, LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Quad | 48 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.5, 50mm (telephoto), 1/2.8", 0.8µm, PDAF, 2x optical zoom 13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚, 16mm (ultrawide) | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.7", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS 12 MP, f/2.2, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm 5 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.5, 24mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps; gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.5, 24mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | Yes |
| 35mm jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| Virtual proximity sensing | Virtual Proximity Sensing | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 33W wired | 25W wired |
| Type | 4200 mAh | Li-Ion 4500 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Gray, Aurora, White | Awesome Black, Awesome White, Awesome Purple, Awesome Mint |
| Models | V2059A | SM-A528B, SM-A528B/DS, SM-A528N |
| Price | About 460 EUR | £ 112.98 / € 249.47 |
| SAR | - | 0.72 W/kg (head) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.88 W/kg (head) 0.84 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 113h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -27.5 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 429675 (v8), 506432(v9) GeekBench: 11060 (v4.4), 2801 (v5.1) GFXBench: 28fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo X60s
- Faster CPU clock speed (Exynos 1080)
- Potentially faster charging (33W)
- Unique design language (vivo)
- Potentially higher thermal throttling
- Less efficient chipset (5nm vs 6nm)
- Display brightness likely lower than A52s 5G
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
- More efficient chipset (Snapdragon 778G, 6nm)
- Brighter display (800 nits)
- Excellent battery life (113h Endurance Rating)
- Slower charging speed (25W)
- Potentially less raw CPU power
- Samsung's One UI can be divisive
Display Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G boasts a significant advantage with its measured peak brightness of 800 nits, ensuring excellent visibility outdoors. While the X60s display specs are not provided, Samsung’s Super AMOLED panel, coupled with the higher brightness, offers a superior viewing experience in bright conditions. Both displays feature an 'Infinite' (Samsung) contrast ratio, suggesting deep blacks typical of AMOLED technology. The lack of refresh rate information for the X60s makes a direct comparison difficult, but the A52s 5G’s 120Hz panel (commonly found in this model) would provide a smoother scrolling experience.
Camera Comparison
Both devices offer photo and video capabilities, but detailed sensor information is limited. The A52s 5G likely benefits from Samsung’s established image processing pipeline, known for vibrant colors and strong dynamic range. Without specific sensor size or aperture details for the X60s, it’s difficult to assess its low-light performance. The presence of OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) on either device would be a significant advantage for video recording and low-light photography, but this is not specified in the provided data. The inclusion of a 2MP macro camera on the A52s 5G is largely a marketing feature with limited practical benefit.
Performance
The vivo X60s utilizes the Exynos 1080 (5nm), featuring a Cortex-A78 prime core clocked at 2.8 GHz. The Galaxy A52s 5G, however, employs the Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G (6nm). While the X60s’ prime core has a higher clock speed, the Snapdragon 778G’s 6nm process offers superior power efficiency. The CPU configurations are similar – both feature a 1x Cortex-A78 prime core and 3x Cortex-A78 performance cores – but the Snapdragon’s Adreno 642L GPU generally outperforms the Mali-G78 MP4 found in the X60s, particularly in sustained gaming scenarios. The 6nm node of the Snapdragon 778G also contributes to better thermal management, reducing the likelihood of performance throttling during extended use.
Battery Life
Both the vivo X60s and Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G achieve an Endurance rating of 113 hours, indicating comparable battery life. However, the charging speeds differ: the X60s supports 33W wired charging, while the A52s 5G is limited to 25W. This means the X60s can potentially recharge faster, but the Snapdragon 778G’s efficiency in the A52s 5G may offset this advantage in real-world usage. The A52s 5G’s more efficient chipset could translate to longer screen-on time despite the slower charging speed.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo X60s if you prioritize raw CPU performance for demanding tasks and appreciate a potentially more unique design aesthetic. However, be prepared for potentially higher temperatures under sustained load. Buy the Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G if you value a consistently smooth user experience, a brighter and more visible display in sunlight, and a more efficient chipset that translates to excellent battery life and less thermal throttling. It's the safer, more well-rounded option for the average user.