vivo X60s vs OnePlus Nord 2 5G: A Deep Dive into Mid-Range Power
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the OnePlus Nord 2 5G emerges as the stronger choice. Its significantly faster 65W charging, coupled with comparable battery endurance, provides a more convenient daily experience. While the X60s offers a slightly different chipset, the Nord 2’s overall package is more compelling.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo X60s | OnePlus Nord 2 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1800 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - EU |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 28, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 41, 66, 78 SA/NSA - EU |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat18 1200/150 Mbps, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1x | - | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, May 24 | 2021, July 22 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, May 24 | Available. Released 2021, July 28 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 158.6 x 73.2 x 7.6 mm (6.24 x 2.88 x 0.30 in) | 159.1 x 73.3 x 8.3 mm (6.26 x 2.89 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 176 g (6.21 oz) | 189 g (6.67 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2376 pixels (~398 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.56 inches, 104.6 cm2 (~90.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~85.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+ | Fluid AMOLED, 90Hz, HDR10+ |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.8 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Exynos 1080 (5 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 1200 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G78 MP10 | Mali-G77 MC9 |
| OS | Android 11, OriginOS 1.0 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 13, OxygenOS 13 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | - | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Zeiss optics, color spectrum sensor, Pixel Shift, LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 48 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.5, 50mm (telephoto), 1/2.8", 0.8µm, PDAF, 2x optical zoom 13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚, 16mm (ultrawide) | - |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.5, 24mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | - |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.9, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.3, 120˚ (ultrawide) Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | Auto HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.5, 24mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | 32 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, SBAS, NavIC |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Virtual proximity sensing | - | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 33W wired | 65W wired, PD, 100% in 30 min |
| Type | 4200 mAh | Li-Po 4500 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Gray, Aurora, White | Gray Sierra, Blue Haze, Green Wood, Pac-Man Edition |
| Models | V2059A | DN2101, DN2103 |
| Price | About 460 EUR | € 189.00 / $ 219.99 / £ 148.00 |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 102h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -24.3 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 512164 (v8) | 598022 (v9) GeekBench: 2792 (v5.1) GFXBench: 38fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo X60s
- Potentially refined software experience (region dependent)
- Slightly different chipset architecture
- Compact form factor (likely, based on vivo's design language)
- Slower 33W charging
- Display brightness likely lower than Nord 2 5G
- Limited information on camera sensor specs
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
- 65W SuperVOOC charging with PD
- Brighter display (633 nits)
- Potentially more powerful GPU (Dimensity 1200)
- OxygenOS can be divisive (though generally well-regarded)
- Software updates may be less frequent than some competitors
- Camera processing may not appeal to all users
Display Comparison
The OnePlus Nord 2 5G boasts a brighter display, reaching a measured 633 nits, compared to an unspecified brightness for the X60s. While both likely utilize AMOLED panels for vibrant colors, the Nord 2’s higher peak brightness translates to better visibility outdoors. Both displays feature an 'infinite' contrast ratio, typical of AMOLED technology. The absence of refresh rate data for the X60s means the Nord 2 likely has an advantage if it supports a higher refresh rate (a common feature in this price bracket).
Camera Comparison
Both phones are advertised as capable photo and video devices, but detailed sensor information is lacking. Without specifics on sensor size, aperture, or OIS, a direct comparison is difficult. However, the market positioning suggests the Nord 2 5G may lean towards a more versatile camera system, while the X60s might prioritize image processing tuned for a specific aesthetic. The prevalence of 2MP macro lenses on both devices suggests they are largely marketing features and shouldn't heavily influence purchasing decisions.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The OnePlus Nord 2 5G’s MediaTek Dimensity 1200 (6nm) has a slight edge in CPU clock speed with its 3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 prime core versus the X60s’ Exynos 1080’s 2.8 GHz Cortex-A78. Both chips share the same Cortex-A78 and A55 configuration for their secondary cores. The 6nm process node of the Dimensity 1200 also offers a potential efficiency advantage over the Exynos 1080’s 5nm node, potentially leading to better sustained performance under load. Both devices likely feature ample RAM, but the type (LPDDR4x vs LPDDR5) isn't specified, impacting memory bandwidth.
Battery Life
Both the vivo X60s and OnePlus Nord 2 5G achieve an endurance rating of 102 hours, indicating similar overall battery life. However, the charging experience is drastically different. The Nord 2 5G’s 65W wired charging, with PD support and a 30-minute full charge time, is a significant advantage over the X60s’ 33W charging. This faster charging mitigates any potential battery life differences, offering greater convenience for users who frequently need to top up their devices.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo X60s if you prioritize a potentially more refined software experience (depending on your region’s vivo skin) and are less concerned with charging speed. Buy the OnePlus Nord 2 5G if you value rapid charging, consistent performance, and a clean, OxygenOS interface. Gamers will also appreciate the Nord 2’s slightly more powerful GPU.