vivo X60s vs Motorola Edge 20 Fusion: A Deep Dive into Mid-Range Performance

The vivo X60s and Motorola Edge 20 Fusion represent compelling options in the increasingly competitive mid-range smartphone market. The X60s, with its Exynos 1080, aims for raw processing power, while the Edge 20 Fusion leverages the efficiency of the Dimensity 800U. This comparison dissects their key differences to determine which device delivers the best overall experience.

Phones Images

🏆 Quick Verdict

For users prioritizing sustained performance and a slightly more refined chipset, the vivo X60s emerges as the winner. Its Exynos 1080, built on a 5nm process, offers a performance edge, though the Motorola Edge 20 Fusion provides a strong value proposition with its efficient Dimensity 800U.

PHONES
Phone Names	vivo X60s	Motorola Edge 20 Fusion

Network
2G bands	GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900	GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900
3G bands	HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100	HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100
4G bands	1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41	1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 66
5G bands	1, 3, 28, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA	1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78, 66 SA/NSA/Sub6
Speed	HSPA, LTE, 5G	HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat18 1200/150 Mbps, 5G
Technology	GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G	GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G
	CDMA2000 1x	-

Launch
Announced	2021, May 24	2021, August 17
Status	Available. Released 2021, May 24	Available. Released 2021, August 27

Body
Build	-	Glass front
Dimensions	158.6 x 73.2 x 7.6 mm (6.24 x 2.88 x 0.30 in)	166 x 76 x 8.3 mm (6.54 x 2.99 x 0.33 in)
SIM	Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM	Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM
Weight	176 g (6.21 oz)	185 g (6.53 oz)
	-	Water-repellent design

Display
Resolution	1080 x 2376 pixels (~398 ppi density)	1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~393 ppi density)
Size	6.56 inches, 104.6 cm2 (~90.1% screen-to-body ratio)	6.7 inches, 108.4 cm2 (~85.9% screen-to-body ratio)
Type	AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+	OLED, 1B colors, 90Hz, HDR10+

Platform
CPU	Octa-core (1x2.8 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)	Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
Chipset	Exynos 1080 (5 nm)	Mediatek Dimensity 800U (7 nm)
GPU	Mali-G78 MP10	Mali-G57 MC3
OS	Android 11, OriginOS 1.0	Android 11

Memory
Card slot	No	microSDXC
Internal	128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM	128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM
	UFS 3.1	-

Main Camera
Features	Zeiss optics, color spectrum sensor, Pixel Shift, LED flash, HDR, panorama	LED flash, HDR, panorama
Quad	48 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.5, 50mm (telephoto), 1/2.8", 0.8µm, PDAF, 2x optical zoom 13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚, 16mm (ultrawide)	-
Single	32 MP, f/2.5, 24mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm	-
Triple	-	108 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide) Auxiliary lens
Video	4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS	4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS

Selfie camera
Features	HDR	HDR
Single	32 MP, f/2.5, 24mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm	32 MP, f/2.3, (wide), 0.7µm
Video	1080p@30fps	1080p@30fps

Sound
3.5mm jack	No	Yes
35mm jack	No	Yes
Loudspeaker	Yes	Yes

Comms
Bluetooth	5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD	5.0, A2DP, LE
NFC	Yes	Yes
Positioning	GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS	GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO
Radio	No	FM radio
USB	USB Type-C, OTG	USB Type-C 2.0
WLAN	Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct	Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct

Features
Sensors	Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass	Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
	Virtual proximity sensing	-

Battery
Charging	33W wired	30W wired
Type	4200 mAh	Li-Po 5000 mAh

Misc
Colors	Gray, Aurora, White	Electric Graphite, Cyber Teal
Models	V2059A	-
Price	About 460 EUR	About 250 EUR

vivo X60s

More powerful Exynos 1080 processor
Faster 33W wired charging
Potentially better image processing

Potentially lower battery life due to less efficient chipset
May run warmer under sustained load

Motorola Edge 20 Fusion

More power-efficient Dimensity 800U processor
Likely longer battery life
Competitive price point

Less powerful processor compared to the Exynos 1080
Slower 30W wired charging

Display Comparison

Neither device boasts a standout display. While specific panel details (like peak brightness or color gamut coverage) are absent, the focus here is on the underlying processors. Both likely utilize AMOLED panels common in this price bracket. The absence of high refresh rate information suggests both are likely 60Hz, which is standard for the segment. Bezels are likely comparable, and the real differentiator will be software-based color calibration, which is brand-specific.

Camera Comparison

Without detailed camera specs, a direct comparison is limited. However, the chipset plays a role in image signal processing (ISP) capabilities. The Exynos 1080 likely has a more advanced ISP, potentially resulting in better dynamic range and noise reduction. The Motorola Edge 20 Fusion’s Dimensity 800U ISP is still competent, but may not match the X60s in complex lighting conditions. The absence of information on sensor sizes and OIS makes it difficult to assess image quality definitively, but the X60s’ more powerful processor gives it an edge in post-processing.

Performance

The core difference lies in the chipsets. The vivo X60s’ Exynos 1080 (5nm) features a more complex CPU configuration – a 1x2.8 GHz Cortex-A78, 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78, and 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 – compared to the Motorola Edge 20 Fusion’s Dimensity 800U (7nm) with its 2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 and 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55. The 5nm fabrication process of the Exynos 1080 provides a significant advantage in thermal efficiency, potentially leading to less throttling during extended gaming sessions. While the Dimensity 800U is a capable chip, the Exynos 1080’s architecture and node size translate to superior multi-core and single-core performance. The X60s will likely handle graphically intensive tasks and multitasking more smoothly.

Battery Life

The Motorola Edge 20 Fusion’s 30W charging is slightly slower than the vivo X60s’ 33W charging. However, the Dimensity 800U’s 7nm process is inherently more power-efficient than the Exynos 1080’s 5nm process. This means the Edge 20 Fusion will likely offer longer battery life despite potentially having a similar or slightly smaller battery capacity. The 3W difference in charging speed is unlikely to be a major factor for most users, but the efficiency advantage of the Dimensity chip is noteworthy.

Buying Guide

Buy the vivo X60s if you need a phone capable of handling demanding applications and games with consistent frame rates, and appreciate a more powerful processor. Buy the Motorola Edge 20 Fusion if you prioritize battery life, a balanced experience, and a more affordable price point, and don't require the absolute highest level of processing power.

Frequently Asked Questions

❓ Does the Exynos 1080 in the vivo X60s overheat during prolonged gaming sessions?

While the Exynos 1080 is a powerful chip, the 5nm fabrication process helps mitigate thermal throttling. However, sustained gaming at maximum settings will inevitably generate heat. The X60s likely has thermal management systems in place, but users should expect some performance reduction after extended play.

❓ Is the Motorola Edge 20 Fusion a good choice for mobile gaming?

The Dimensity 800U in the Edge 20 Fusion is capable of handling most mobile games at medium to high settings. While it doesn't match the raw power of the Exynos 1080, its efficiency allows for longer gaming sessions without significant overheating. It's a solid choice for casual and moderate gamers.

❓ How significant is the difference in charging speed between 30W and 33W?

The difference between 30W and 33W charging is relatively minor. Both will fully charge the phone in approximately 60-90 minutes. The 33W charging on the vivo X60s will provide a slightly faster initial charge, but the overall time difference is unlikely to be noticeable for most users.