vivo X60s vs. Google Pixel 5a 5G: A Deep Dive into Mid-Range Champions
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing gaming and demanding applications, the vivo X60s emerges as the winner thanks to its significantly more powerful Exynos 1080 chipset. However, the Google Pixel 5a 5G offers a compelling package with its excellent camera and reliable battery life, making it ideal for everyday users and photography enthusiasts.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo X60s | Google Pixel 5a 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 46, 48, 66, 71 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 28, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 5, 12, 25, 28, 41, 66, 71, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1x | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, May 24 | 2021, August 17 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, May 24 | Available. Released 2021, August 26 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), aluminum frame, aluminum back |
| Dimensions | 158.6 x 73.2 x 7.6 mm (6.24 x 2.88 x 0.30 in) | 156.2 x 73.2 x 8.8 mm (6.15 x 2.88 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM |
| Weight | 176 g (6.21 oz) | 183 g (6.46 oz) |
| - | IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2376 pixels (~398 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~415 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.56 inches, 104.6 cm2 (~90.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.34 inches, 97.0 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+ | OLED, HDR |
| - | Always-on display | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.8 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Kryo 475 Prime & 1x2.2 GHz Kryo 475 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 475 Silver) |
| Chipset | Exynos 1080 (5 nm) | Qualcomm SM7250 Snapdragon 765G 5G (7 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G78 MP10 | Adreno 620 |
| OS | Android 11, OriginOS 1.0 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 14 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | - | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 12.2 MP, f/1.7, 27mm, (wide), 1/2.55", 1.4µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 16 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1.0µm |
| Features | Zeiss optics, color spectrum sensor, Pixel Shift, LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, Pixel Shift, Auto-HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 48 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.5, 50mm (telephoto), 1/2.8", 0.8µm, PDAF, 2x optical zoom 13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚, 16mm (ultrawide) | - |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.5, 24mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | 8 MP, f/2.0, 24mm (wide), 1.12µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps; gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.5, 24mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | 8 MP, f/2.0, 24mm (wide), 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | Yes |
| 35mm jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.0, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, QZSS, BDS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C 3.1 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Virtual proximity sensing | - | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 33W wired | 18W wired, PD2.0 |
| Type | 4200 mAh | Li-Po 4680 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Gray, Aurora, White | Mostly Black |
| Models | V2059A | G1F8F, G4S1M |
| Price | About 460 EUR | $ 189.00 / C$ 249.99 |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 122h |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 291303 (v8) GeekBench: 1337 (v5.1) GFXBench: 19fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo X60s
- Significantly faster processor for gaming and multitasking
- Faster 33W wired charging
- Potentially better thermal management due to 5nm process
- Camera performance is less predictable without detailed sensor information
- Software updates may be less frequent than on the Pixel
Google Pixel 5a 5G
- Excellent camera quality thanks to Google’s software
- Long battery life with consistent performance
- Guaranteed software updates and clean Android experience
- Slower processor compared to the Exynos 1080
- Slower 18W charging
Display Comparison
The Google Pixel 5a 5G boasts a brighter display, reaching a measured peak of 861 nits, which translates to better visibility under direct sunlight compared to the X60s (brightness data unavailable). While the X60s’ panel specifications are unknown, the Pixel 5a 5G’s ‘Infinite’ contrast ratio suggests a strong OLED panel. Both phones likely utilize similar OLED technology, but the Pixel’s higher peak brightness provides a tangible advantage for outdoor use.
Camera Comparison
The Pixel 5a 5G leverages Google’s computational photography prowess, even without top-tier hardware. While specific sensor details for both phones are missing, the Pixel’s strength lies in its image processing algorithms, delivering consistently excellent photos in various conditions. The X60s likely relies more on hardware capabilities, but without detailed sensor information, it’s difficult to assess its image quality relative to the Pixel. The Pixel 5a 5G’s focus on software optimization gives it an edge in dynamic range and low-light performance.
Performance
The vivo X60s’ Exynos 1080 (5nm) significantly outperforms the Google Pixel 5a 5G’s Snapdragon 765G (7nm) in raw processing power. The Exynos 1080’s Cortex-A78 cores, clocked up to 2.8 GHz, offer a substantial leap over the Snapdragon 765G’s Kryo 475 Prime core at 2.4 GHz. This difference is particularly noticeable in demanding tasks like video editing and gaming. The 5nm fabrication process of the Exynos 1080 also contributes to better thermal efficiency, potentially reducing throttling during sustained workloads. While the Pixel 5a 5G is capable for everyday tasks, the X60s provides a smoother experience for power users.
Battery Life
Both the vivo X60s and Google Pixel 5a 5G achieve an endurance rating of 122 hours, indicating similar overall battery life. However, the charging speeds differ significantly. The X60s supports 33W wired charging, allowing for a faster 0-100% charge compared to the Pixel 5a 5G’s 18W charging with PD2.0. This means the X60s can top up its battery more quickly, minimizing downtime, despite potentially having a similar capacity battery.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo X60s if you need a phone capable of handling graphically intensive games and multitasking without slowdowns, and if you value faster charging speeds. Buy the Google Pixel 5a 5G if you prioritize a consistently excellent camera experience, long battery life, and a clean, bloatware-free Android experience with guaranteed software updates.