vivo X60 vs Xiaomi Mi 11i: A Detailed Comparison of Mid-Range Powerhouses
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing sustained performance and a brighter display, the Xiaomi Mi 11i is the stronger choice. Its Snapdragon 888, despite potential thermal concerns, offers a noticeable performance edge. However, users seeking a more balanced and potentially cooler experience may prefer the vivo X60.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo X60 | Xiaomi Mi 11i |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41 - International | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 7, 28, 40, 41, 78 SA/NSA - International | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, March 22 | 2021, March 29 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, April 02 | Available. Released 2021, May 31 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Schott Xensation Up), glass back, plastic frame | - |
| Dimensions | 159.6 x 75 x 7.4 mm (6.28 x 2.95 x 0.29 in) | 163.7 x 76.4 x 7.8 mm (6.44 x 3.01 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 176 g (6.21 oz) | 196 g (6.91 oz) |
| - | IP53, dust and splash resistant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Schott Xensation Up | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2376 pixels (~398 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.56 inches, 104.6 cm2 (~87.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~85.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+ | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 900 nits (HBM), 1300 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Kryo 585 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 585 & 4x1.80 GHz Kryo 585) | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-X1 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8250-AC Snapdragon 870 5G (7 nm) | Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888 5G (5 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 650 | Adreno 660 |
| OS | Android 11, Funtouch 11.1 | Android 11, MIUI 12 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| - | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Zeiss optics, color spectrum sensor, Pixel Shift, LED flash, HDR, panorama | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 48 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.5, 50mm (telephoto), 1/2.8", 0.8µm, PDAF, 2x optical zoom 13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚, 16mm (ultrawide) | - |
| Single | - | 20 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.4", 0.8µm |
| Triple | - | 108 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide) 5 MP, f/2.4, 50mm (telephoto macro), 1/5.0", 1.12µm, AF |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS | 8K@30fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240/960fps, gyro-EIS, HDR10+ |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.5, 24mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | 20 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.4", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, 720p@120fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| - | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS, NavIC | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 33W wired | 33W wired, PD3.0, QC3, 100% in 52 min |
| Type | 4300 mAh | Li-Po 4520 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Midnight Black, Shimmer Blue | Celestial Silver, Frosty White, Cosmic Black |
| Models | V2045 | M2012K11G |
| Price | About 550 EUR | About 230 EUR |
| SAR | 0.35 W/kg (head) 0.63 W/kg (body) | 0.95 W/kg (head) 0.74 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.57 W/kg (head) 0.77 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 96h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -26.0 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 690021 (v8) GeekBench: 3641 (v5.1) |
vivo X60
- Excellent thermal management with Snapdragon 870
- Balanced performance for everyday tasks
- Potentially superior camera color science
- Less powerful chipset compared to the Mi 11i
- Display brightness likely lower than the Mi 11i
Xiaomi Mi 11i
- Significantly more powerful Snapdragon 888
- Brighter display for outdoor visibility
- Faster charging (claimed 52 minutes to 100%)
- Potential for thermal throttling under heavy load
- May require more careful power management
Display Comparison
The Xiaomi Mi 11i boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 939 nits, compared to an unspecified brightness for the vivo X60. This makes the Mi 11i more usable outdoors under direct sunlight. Both displays feature an infinite (nominal) contrast ratio, typical for AMOLED panels. While the X60’s panel characteristics aren’t detailed, the Mi 11i’s brightness advantage is a clear win for outdoor visibility. The lack of LTPO technology on either device means refresh rate scaling isn’t as power efficient as on higher-end models.
Camera Comparison
Both devices are advertised as having capable photo and video capabilities, but specific details are limited. Without sensor size or aperture information, a direct comparison is difficult. However, the Snapdragon 888 in the Mi 11i offers a more advanced Image Signal Processor (ISP), potentially leading to better image processing and low-light performance. The X60’s camera system likely focuses on color science and a more natural look, a hallmark of vivo’s camera tuning. The absence of details on OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) for either device makes it hard to assess video stabilization capabilities.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets: the vivo X60 utilizes the Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G (7nm), while the Mi 11i packs the more powerful Snapdragon 888 5G (5nm). The 888’s Cortex-X1 prime core (2.84 GHz) offers a substantial performance uplift over the 870’s Kryo 585 (3.2 GHz). However, the 5nm process of the 888 is more efficient, but also known to generate more heat under sustained load. The X60’s 870, built on a 7nm node, is known for its excellent balance of performance and thermal management. Both phones benefit from 5G connectivity, but the Mi 11i’s superior GPU will translate to higher frame rates in demanding games.
Battery Life
Both the vivo X60 and Xiaomi Mi 11i share a 33W wired charging capability, with the Mi 11i claiming a full charge in 52 minutes. Both phones achieve an endurance rating of 96 hours, suggesting similar real-world battery life despite potentially different battery capacities (not specified for the X60). The Mi 11i’s more power-hungry Snapdragon 888 is likely offset by software optimizations and potentially a larger battery, resulting in comparable endurance.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo X60 if you need a phone that prioritizes a smooth, consistent experience with a focus on camera quality and a more manageable thermal profile. It's ideal for everyday users and content creators who value stability. Buy the Xiaomi Mi 11i if you prefer maximum performance for gaming and demanding applications, and are willing to accept potentially higher temperatures and slightly less refined software.