vivo X60 vs Oppo Find X3 Neo: A Deep Dive into Snapdragon 870 vs 865 Performance
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the vivo X60 emerges as the better choice. While the Oppo Find X3 Neo boasts significantly faster 65W charging, the Snapdragon 870 in the X60 provides a noticeable performance uplift in both CPU and GPU tasks, making it more future-proof and responsive for demanding applications and gaming.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo X60 | Oppo Find X3 Neo |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41 - International | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 26, 20, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 7, 28, 40, 41, 78 SA/NSA - International | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, March 22 | 2021, March 11 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, April 02 | Available. Released 2021, March 19 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Schott Xensation Up), glass back, plastic frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 159.6 x 75 x 7.4 mm (6.28 x 2.95 x 0.29 in) | 159.9 x 72.5 x 8 mm (6.30 x 2.85 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 176 g (6.21 oz) | 184 g (6.49 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Schott Xensation Up | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2376 pixels (~398 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~402 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.56 inches, 104.6 cm2 (~87.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.55 inches, 103.6 cm2 (~89.3% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+ | AMOLED, 90Hz, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 1100 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Kryo 585 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 585 & 4x1.80 GHz Kryo 585) | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-A77 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A77 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8250-AC Snapdragon 870 5G (7 nm) | Qualcomm SM8250 Snapdragon 865 5G (7 nm+) |
| GPU | Adreno 650 | Adreno 650 |
| OS | Android 11, Funtouch 11.1 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 12, ColorOS |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Zeiss optics, color spectrum sensor, Pixel Shift, LED flash, HDR, panorama | Color spectrum sensor, Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 48 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.5, 50mm (telephoto), 1/2.8", 0.8µm, PDAF, 2x optical zoom 13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚, 16mm (ultrawide) | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.4, 52mm (telephoto), PDAF, 2x optical zoom 16 MP, f/2.2, 123˚ (ultrawide) 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps; gyro-EIS, HDR |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | Panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.5, 24mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | 32 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS, NavIC | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 33W wired | 65W wired, 100% in 35 min Reverse wired |
| Type | 4300 mAh | Li-Po 4500 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Midnight Black, Shimmer Blue | Galactic Silver, Starlight Black |
| Models | V2045 | CPH2207 |
| Price | About 550 EUR | About 180 EUR |
| SAR | 0.35 W/kg (head) 0.63 W/kg (body) | - |
vivo X60
- Faster processor for smoother performance
- More efficient chipset for potentially better battery life
- Modern Snapdragon 870 offers better future-proofing
- Slower 33W charging compared to the Oppo
- Lacks reverse wireless charging
Oppo Find X3 Neo
- Blazing-fast 65W charging for quick top-ups
- Reverse wired charging for added convenience
- Potentially lower price point (depending on current deals)
- Older Snapdragon 865 chipset with less processing power
- May exhibit more thermal throttling under sustained load
Display Comparison
Context data lacks display specifics for both devices. However, given their market positioning, both likely feature AMOLED panels with at least 90Hz refresh rates. The Find X3 Neo, being positioned slightly higher initially, *may* have had a marginally brighter panel. The key difference will likely be in color calibration and software-based features, which are difficult to assess without direct testing. Bezels are expected to be similarly minimal on both.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specs, a direct comparison is limited. Both phones likely feature multi-camera systems with a primary sensor, ultrawide, and potentially a telephoto or macro lens. The image processing algorithms will differ, with Oppo historically favoring more vibrant, saturated colors, while vivo often aims for a more natural look. The Snapdragon 870’s ISP (Image Signal Processor) is slightly improved over the 865, potentially leading to better dynamic range and noise reduction in the X60. Sensor size and aperture are critical factors, but absent that data, we can only speculate.
Performance
The vivo X60’s Qualcomm SM8250-AC Snapdragon 870 5G (7nm) represents a refined version of the Snapdragon 865. While both are octa-core CPUs, the 870 features a faster prime core (3.2 GHz Kryo 585 vs 2.84 GHz Cortex-A77). This translates to quicker app launches and snappier overall responsiveness. The 870 also benefits from architectural improvements, leading to better sustained performance under load. The Cortex-A77 cores in the Find X3 Neo are capable, but the 870’s Kryo 585 cores offer a performance edge. The GPU performance will also favor the X60, though the difference isn’t massive. Both utilize LPDDR4X RAM, but the 870’s more efficient architecture will likely result in better thermal management during prolonged gaming sessions.
Battery Life
The Oppo Find X3 Neo’s 65W wired charging is a significant advantage, promising a full charge in just 35 minutes. The vivo X60’s 33W charging is considerably slower. However, battery life isn’t solely determined by charging speed. The Snapdragon 870’s improved efficiency in the X60 could offset the difference in battery capacity (assuming similar capacities, which is likely). The Find X3 Neo’s reverse wired charging is a useful feature absent on the X60, allowing it to charge other devices wirelessly.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo X60 if you prioritize sustained performance for gaming and multitasking, and value a slightly more modern chipset. It’s ideal for users who frequently edit photos/videos or play graphically intensive games. Buy the Oppo Find X3 Neo if rapid charging is paramount, and you’re looking for a flagship experience on a tighter budget. It’s a great option for users who need to quickly top up their battery throughout the day and don't require the absolute latest in processing power.