vivo X60 vs OnePlus 9RT 5G: A Deep Dive into Performance and Value
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the OnePlus 9RT 5G emerges as the better choice. Its Snapdragon 888 offers a noticeable performance edge, and the 65W charging is a game-changer, fully charging the device in just 29 minutes. However, the X60 remains a strong contender for those prioritizing sustained performance and a slightly more refined software experience.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo X60 | OnePlus 9RT 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1800 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41 - International | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 - Global |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 7, 28, 40, 41, 78 SA/NSA - International | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 41, 78 SA/NSA - Global |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat18 1200/200 Mbps, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| - | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, March 22 | 2021, October 13 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, April 02 | Available. Released 2021, October 19 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Schott Xensation Up), glass back, plastic frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 159.6 x 75 x 7.4 mm (6.28 x 2.95 x 0.29 in) | 162.2 x 74.6 x 8.3 mm (6.39 x 2.94 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 176 g (6.21 oz) | 198.5 g (7.02 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Schott Xensation Up | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2376 pixels (~398 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~397 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.56 inches, 104.6 cm2 (~87.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.62 inches, 106.3 cm2 (~87.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+ | AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+ |
| - | Always-on display | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Kryo 585 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 585 & 4x1.80 GHz Kryo 585) | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-X1 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8250-AC Snapdragon 870 5G (7 nm) | Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888 5G (5 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 650 | Adreno 660 |
| OS | Android 11, Funtouch 11.1 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 13, OxygenOS 13 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| - | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Zeiss optics, color spectrum sensor, Pixel Shift, LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 48 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.5, 50mm (telephoto), 1/2.8", 0.8µm, PDAF, 2x optical zoom 13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚, 16mm (ultrawide) | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56”, 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 16 MP, f/2.2, 14mm, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.6", 1.0µm 2 MP (macro) |
| Single | - | 16 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps, Auto HDR, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.5, 24mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | 16 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS, NavIC | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1), GALILEO (E1+E5a) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 33W wired | 65W wired, 100% in 29 min |
| Type | 4300 mAh | Li-Po 4500 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Midnight Black, Shimmer Blue | Hacker Black, Nano Silver, Blue |
| Models | V2045 | MT2110, MT2111 |
| Price | About 550 EUR | About 590 EUR |
| SAR | 0.35 W/kg (head) 0.63 W/kg (body) | - |
vivo X60
- More efficient Snapdragon 870 chipset
- Potentially better sustained performance
- Refined software experience (typical of vivo)
- Slower 33W charging
- Less powerful GPU compared to the 888
- May lack the latest connectivity features
OnePlus 9RT 5G
- Faster Snapdragon 888 chipset
- Blazing-fast 65W charging (0-100% in 29 mins)
- Stronger GPU for gaming
- Snapdragon 888 prone to thermal throttling
- Higher power consumption
- OxygenOS can be more feature-heavy (preference)
Display Comparison
Both phones likely feature AMOLED displays, a standard for this price range, but specific details like peak brightness and color accuracy aren't provided. However, the focus here is on performance, not display prowess. The absence of LTPO technology on either device suggests standard refresh rate management, impacting battery life during dynamic content viewing. Bezels are likely comparable, given both brands' design philosophies.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed sensor information, a direct camera comparison is difficult. However, both brands typically employ capable camera systems. The OnePlus 9RT likely benefits from the 888’s improved image signal processor (ISP), potentially leading to faster processing and better low-light performance. The X60’s image processing style is known for its natural color reproduction, while OnePlus tends towards more vibrant, saturated images. The absence of information on OIS suggests it may be present on both, but its effectiveness remains unknown.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The OnePlus 9RT 5G’s Snapdragon 888 (5nm) boasts a Cortex-X1 prime core clocked at 2.84 GHz, offering a significant theoretical performance advantage over the vivo X60’s Snapdragon 870 (7nm). The 888’s Adreno 660 GPU also surpasses the 870’s Adreno 660. However, the 7nm process of the 870 generally translates to better thermal efficiency. The 888 is known to throttle under sustained load, while the 870 maintains higher clock speeds for longer. The 9RT’s LPDDR5 RAM is standard, but the X60’s RAM type is unspecified, potentially impacting memory bandwidth. This difference is most noticeable in multitasking and demanding games.
Battery Life
The vivo X60’s 33W charging is significantly slower than the OnePlus 9RT 5G’s 65W charging, which promises a full charge in just 29 minutes. While battery capacity isn’t specified, the faster charging speed of the 9RT is a major convenience factor. The Snapdragon 888’s higher power consumption will likely offset some of the battery life gains, but the 9RT’s charging speed mitigates this concern. The 870’s efficiency gives the X60 a slight edge in battery endurance under moderate use.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo X60 if you need a phone that consistently delivers smooth performance over extended gaming sessions and value a more balanced thermal profile. It's ideal for users who prioritize efficiency and don't necessarily need the absolute fastest processing speeds. Buy the OnePlus 9RT 5G if you prefer a phone with raw power for demanding tasks, lightning-fast 65W charging, and a more aggressive performance profile, even if it means potentially experiencing some thermal throttling under heavy load.