vivo X60 vs Google Pixel 5a 5G: A Deep Dive into Performance, Battery, and Value
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing performance and gaming, the vivo X60 is the clear winner. Its Snapdragon 870 delivers significantly faster processing speeds. However, the Google Pixel 5a 5G offers a compelling package for those valuing battery life, Google’s software experience, and a consistently excellent camera, making it ideal for everyday users.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo X60 | Google Pixel 5a 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41 - International | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 46, 48, 66, 71 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 7, 28, 40, 41, 78 SA/NSA - International | 1, 2, 5, 12, 25, 28, 41, 66, 71, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| - | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, March 22 | 2021, August 17 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, April 02 | Available. Released 2021, August 26 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Schott Xensation Up), glass back, plastic frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), aluminum frame, aluminum back |
| Dimensions | 159.6 x 75 x 7.4 mm (6.28 x 2.95 x 0.29 in) | 156.2 x 73.2 x 8.8 mm (6.15 x 2.88 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM |
| Weight | 176 g (6.21 oz) | 183 g (6.46 oz) |
| - | IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Schott Xensation Up | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2376 pixels (~398 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~415 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.56 inches, 104.6 cm2 (~87.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.34 inches, 97.0 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+ | OLED, HDR |
| - | Always-on display | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Kryo 585 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 585 & 4x1.80 GHz Kryo 585) | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Kryo 475 Prime & 1x2.2 GHz Kryo 475 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 475 Silver) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8250-AC Snapdragon 870 5G (7 nm) | Qualcomm SM7250 Snapdragon 765G 5G (7 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 650 | Adreno 620 |
| OS | Android 11, Funtouch 11.1 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 14 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 12.2 MP, f/1.7, 27mm, (wide), 1/2.55", 1.4µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 16 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1.0µm |
| Features | Zeiss optics, color spectrum sensor, Pixel Shift, LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, Pixel Shift, Auto-HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 48 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.5, 50mm (telephoto), 1/2.8", 0.8µm, PDAF, 2x optical zoom 13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚, 16mm (ultrawide) | - |
| Single | - | 8 MP, f/2.0, 24mm (wide), 1.12µm |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps; gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.5, 24mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | 8 MP, f/2.0, 24mm (wide), 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.0, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS, NavIC | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, QZSS, BDS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.1 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 33W wired | 18W wired, PD2.0 |
| Type | 4300 mAh | Li-Po 4680 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Midnight Black, Shimmer Blue | Mostly Black |
| Models | V2045 | G1F8F, G4S1M |
| Price | About 550 EUR | $ 189.00 / C$ 249.99 |
| SAR | 0.35 W/kg (head) 0.63 W/kg (body) | - |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 122h |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 291303 (v8) GeekBench: 1337 (v5.1) GFXBench: 19fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo X60
- Significantly faster processor for gaming and multitasking
- Faster 33W wired charging
- Potentially more versatile camera system (depending on specs)
- Battery life may be slightly less than Pixel 5a 5G under heavy load
- Software experience may not be as refined as Pixel’s
Google Pixel 5a 5G
- Excellent camera quality with Google’s computational photography
- Long-lasting battery life
- Clean and streamlined Android software experience
- Slower processor compared to the vivo X60
- Slower 18W charging
Display Comparison
The Pixel 5a 5G boasts a brighter display, reaching a measured 861 nits, which translates to better outdoor visibility compared to the X60 (brightness data unavailable). Both displays feature an infinite (nominal) contrast ratio, suggesting excellent black levels. While the X60’s panel specifications are not provided, the Pixel 5a 5G’s brightness advantage is a tangible benefit for users frequently exposed to sunlight. The lack of high refresh rate on either device is a notable omission in today’s market.
Camera Comparison
The Pixel 5a 5G leverages Google’s renowned computational photography prowess, consistently delivering excellent image quality, particularly in challenging lighting conditions. While specific sensor details for the X60 are unavailable, the Pixel 5a 5G’s image processing algorithms excel at dynamic range and noise reduction. The X60 may offer more flexibility with its camera system (depending on its lens configuration), but the Pixel 5a 5G’s consistent results and user-friendly interface make it a strong contender. We're ignoring the likely presence of low-resolution auxiliary cameras on both devices.
Performance
The vivo X60’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G (7nm) significantly outperforms the Pixel 5a 5G’s Snapdragon 765G 5G (7nm). The 870’s octa-core CPU, with its 3.2 GHz Kryo 585 prime core, provides a substantial boost in single-core and multi-core performance compared to the 765G’s 2.4 GHz Kryo 475 Prime core. This difference is particularly noticeable in demanding tasks like gaming and video rendering. The X60 is better equipped for sustained workloads due to the more powerful chipset, potentially leading to less throttling. While both use a 7nm process, the architectural improvements in the 870 yield superior performance.
Battery Life
Both the vivo X60 and Google Pixel 5a 5G achieve an endurance rating of 122 hours, suggesting comparable battery life under similar usage patterns. However, the X60’s 33W wired charging is significantly faster than the Pixel 5a 5G’s 18W wired charging with PD2.0. This means the X60 can replenish its battery much quicker, minimizing downtime. While the endurance rating is similar, the faster charging speed gives the X60 an edge for users who frequently need to top up their battery.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo X60 if you need a phone capable of handling demanding games, video editing, or multitasking without slowdowns. Its superior chipset and faster performance are ideal for power users. Buy the Google Pixel 5a 5G if you prefer a streamlined software experience, exceptional camera quality in all lighting conditions, and long-lasting battery life, even if it means sacrificing some raw processing power.