vivo X60 Pro+ vs Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra: A Deep Dive into Flagship Android Power
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra emerges as the stronger choice. Its significantly faster 67W wired and wireless charging, coupled with a slightly longer endurance rating, provides a more convenient and reliable daily experience. While the X60 Pro+ is a capable device, the Mi 11 Ultra’s charging and display advantages are compelling.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo X60 Pro+ | Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 - International | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 42, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| - | 1, 3, 28, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA - China | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, January 21 | 2021, March 29 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, January 30 | Available. Released 2021, April 02 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, eco leather back, aluminum frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), ceramic back, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 158.6 x 73.4 x 9.1 mm (6.24 x 2.89 x 0.36 in) | 164.3 x 74.6 x 8.4 mm (6.47 x 2.94 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 191 g (6.74 oz) | 234 g (8.25 oz) |
| - | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2376 pixels (~398 ppi density) | 1440 x 3200 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~515 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.56 inches, 104.6 cm2 (~89.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.81 inches, 112.0 cm2 (~91.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1300 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, 900 nits (HBM), 1700 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-X1 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55 | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-X1 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888 5G (5 nm) | Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888 5G (5 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 660 | Adreno 660 |
| OS | Android 11, Funtouch 12 (International), OriginOS 1.0 (China) | Android 11, upgradable to Android 13, MIUI 14 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| - | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, Zeiss optics, Zeiss T* lens coating, Pixel Shift, dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama, 1.1” AMOLED selfie display |
| Quad | 50 MP, f/1.6, (wide), 1/1.31", 1.2µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/3.4, 125mm (periscope telephoto), 1/4.0", PDAF, OIS, 5x optical zoom 32 MP, f/2.1, 50mm (telephoto), 1/2.8", 0.8µm, PDAF, 2x optical zoom 48 MP, f/2.2, 114˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, gimbal OIS, PDAF | - |
| Single | - | 20 MP, f/2.2, 27mm (wide), 1/3.4", 0.8µm |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/2.0, 24mm (wide), 1/1.12", 1.4µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 48 MP, f/4.1, 120mm (periscope telephoto), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS, 5x optical zoom 48 MP, f/2.2, 12mm, 128˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF |
| Video | 8K@30fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS, HDR10+ | 8K@24fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240/960/1920fps, gyro-EIS, HDR10+ rec. |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.5, 24mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | 20 MP, f/2.2, 27mm (wide), 1/3.4", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/60fps, 720p@120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| - | 24-bit/192kHz audio Tuned by Harman Kardon | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, NavIC | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct, DLNA |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| - | Virtual proximity sensing | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 55W wired | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC4, 100% in 36 min 67W wireless, 100% in 39 min 10W reverse wireless |
| Type | 4200 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Orange, Emperor Blue | Ceramic White (Cosmic White), Ceramic Black (Cosmic Black) |
| Models | V2056A, V2047 | M2102K1G, M2102K1C |
| Price | About 800 EUR | About 1500 EUR |
| SAR | 0.80 W/kg (head) 0.47 W/kg (body) | 1.08 W/kg (head) 0.81 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.55 W/kg (head) 0.99 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 95h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -24.3 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 688720 (v8) GeekBench: 3191 (v5.1) GFXBench: 33fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo X60 Pro+
- Potentially more compact design
- vivo’s FunTouch OS may appeal to some users
- Competitive price point (post-launch)
- Slower charging speeds (wired and wireless)
- Lower peak display brightness
- Less detailed camera specifications
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra
- Significantly faster charging (wired and wireless)
- Brighter and higher-contrast display
- Potentially better thermal management
- Larger and heavier form factor
- Xiaomi’s MIUI can be polarizing
- Higher initial launch price
Display Comparison
The Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra boasts a brighter display, reaching a measured 943 nits compared to the vivo X60 Pro+'s 816 nits. This translates to superior visibility under direct sunlight. While both utilize AMOLED technology, the Mi 11 Ultra’s ‘Infinite’ contrast ratio (nominal) suggests a more aggressive dynamic contrast implementation, enhancing perceived image depth. Neither specification details refresh rate or panel technology (LTPO), but both are expected to be 120Hz AMOLED panels. The brightness difference is the key differentiator, benefiting users who frequently use their phones outdoors.
Camera Comparison
Both phones are marketed as camera-centric, but the provided data lacks specifics to make a definitive judgment. Both support Photo and Video capture. Without sensor size, aperture, or image processing details, it’s difficult to assess image quality differences. However, the Mi 11 Ultra’s larger overall camera module suggests the potential for larger sensors and more advanced optics. The absence of information on features like computational photography algorithms makes a detailed comparison impossible based solely on the provided data.
Performance
Both the vivo X60 Pro+ and Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra are powered by the Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888 5G (5 nm) chipset, featuring the same Octa-core CPU configuration. This means raw processing power is virtually identical. However, the Mi 11 Ultra’s superior thermal management, implied by its larger chassis and cooling system (though not explicitly stated in the data), likely results in less performance throttling during sustained workloads like gaming. The lack of LPDDR5x specification for either device means RAM speed is not a differentiating factor.
Battery Life
The Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra edges out the vivo X60 Pro+ in battery endurance, achieving a 95-hour rating versus 91 hours. While the difference is relatively small, it’s compounded by the Mi 11 Ultra’s significantly faster charging capabilities. The 67W wired charging can fully charge the device in approximately 36 minutes, while the 67W wireless charging takes 39 minutes – a massive advantage over the X60 Pro+'s 55W wired charging. The Mi 11 Ultra also includes 10W reverse wireless charging, a feature absent on the X60 Pro+.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo X60 Pro+ if you prioritize a more compact form factor and a potentially more refined software experience (depending on your preference for vivo’s FunTouch OS). Buy the Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra if you demand the fastest possible charging – both wired and wireless – and a brighter, higher-contrast display, making it ideal for media consumption and outdoor use. The Mi 11 Ultra also caters to users who appreciate a more robust and feature-rich camera system.