Vivo X60 Pro+ vs Oppo Find X3 Pro: A Deep Dive into Flagship Performance
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing all-day battery life and consistent camera performance, the vivo X60 Pro+ is the superior choice. Its 91-hour endurance rating, coupled with a capable camera system, outweighs the Oppo Find X3 Pro’s faster charging and slightly brighter display.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo X60 Pro+ | Oppo Find X3 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 - International | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| - | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA - China | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, January 21 | 2021, March 11 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, January 30 | Available. Released 2021, March 19 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, eco leather back, aluminum frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 158.6 x 73.4 x 9.1 mm (6.24 x 2.89 x 0.36 in) | 163.6 x 74 x 8.3 mm (6.44 x 2.91 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM |
| Weight | 191 g (6.74 oz) | 193 g (6.81 oz) |
| - | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2376 pixels (~398 ppi density) | 1440 x 3216 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~525 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.56 inches, 104.6 cm2 (~89.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 108.4 cm2 (~89.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1300 nits (peak) | LTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, BT.2020, 500 nits (typ), 1300 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-X1 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55 | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-X1 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888 5G (5 nm) | Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888 5G (5 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 660 | Adreno 660 |
| OS | Android 11, Funtouch 12 (International), OriginOS 1.0 (China) | Android 11, upgradable to Android 14, ColorOS 14 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM |
| - | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, Zeiss optics, Zeiss T* lens coating, Pixel Shift, dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 50 MP, f/1.6, (wide), 1/1.31", 1.2µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/3.4, 125mm (periscope telephoto), 1/4.0", PDAF, OIS, 5x optical zoom 32 MP, f/2.1, 50mm (telephoto), 1/2.8", 0.8µm, PDAF, 2x optical zoom 48 MP, f/2.2, 114˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, gimbal OIS, PDAF | 50 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.4, 52mm (telephoto), 1/3.4", 1.0µm, 2x optical zoom, PDAF 50 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 110˚ (ultrawide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF 3 MP, f/3.0, (microscope), AF, ring flash, 60x magnification |
| Video | 8K@30fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS, HDR10+ | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps; gyro-EIS; HDR, 10‑bit video |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | Panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.5, 24mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | 32 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, NavIC | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 55W wired | 65W wired, PD, 40% in 10 min 30W wireless, 100% in 80 min 10W reverse wireless |
| Type | 4200 mAh | Li-Po 4500 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Orange, Emperor Blue | Gloss Black, Blue, White, Cosmic Mocha, Mars Edition, Photographer Edition |
| Models | V2056A, V2047 | CPH2173, PEEM00, OPG03 |
| Price | About 800 EUR | About 200 EUR |
| SAR | 0.80 W/kg (head) 0.47 W/kg (body) | - |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 81h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -25.4 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 656467 (v8) GeekBench: 3316 (v5.1) GFXBench: 33fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo X60 Pro+
- Superior battery endurance (91h rating)
- Consistent camera performance
- Slightly brighter display (816 nits)
- Slower wired charging (55W)
- Lacks wireless charging
Oppo Find X3 Pro
- Faster wired charging (65W)
- Wireless and reverse wireless charging
- Theoretically infinite contrast ratio
- Lower battery endurance (81h rating)
- Slightly dimmer display (774 nits)
Display Comparison
Both the vivo X60 Pro+ and Oppo Find X3 Pro feature excellent displays, but subtle differences exist. The X60 Pro+ reaches a measured peak brightness of 816 nits, while the Find X3 Pro manages 774 nits. While the Oppo boasts an 'infinite' contrast ratio, this is a nominal specification common to OLED panels and doesn’t translate to a dramatically different visual experience. Both likely utilize LTPO technology for variable refresh rates, though this isn't explicitly stated in the provided data. The slightly higher peak brightness of the X60 Pro+ will be more noticeable in direct sunlight.
Camera Comparison
Both devices are marketed as camera-centric, but lack specific sensor details in the provided data. Both are capable of photo and video recording. Without sensor size or aperture information, a direct comparison is difficult. However, the X60 Pro+’s reputation leans towards a more balanced and consistently reliable camera experience, while the Find X3 Pro’s camera system is known for its unique wide-angle lens. The absence of details on image processing algorithms makes it impossible to determine which phone produces more pleasing images subjectively.
Performance
Under the hood, both phones are powered by the Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G (5nm). The CPU configuration is identical – an octa-core setup with 1x2.84 GHz Cortex-X1, 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A78, and 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. This means raw processing power will be nearly indistinguishable between the two. Thermal management, however, could be a differentiating factor, though data is lacking. Both phones will likely experience throttling under sustained heavy loads, a common characteristic of the Snapdragon 888. RAM configurations are not specified, but both are expected to utilize LPDDR5 for fast memory access.
Battery Life
The vivo X60 Pro+ boasts an endurance rating of 91 hours, significantly exceeding the Oppo Find X3 Pro’s 81 hours. This translates to a real-world advantage for users who demand all-day battery life. While the Find X3 Pro offers faster wired charging at 65W (versus 55W on the X60 Pro+), and adds 30W wireless and 10W reverse wireless charging, the larger battery capacity and improved efficiency of the X60 Pro+ provide a more substantial benefit for most users. The Find X3 Pro can reach 40% charge in 10 minutes, and 100% in 80 minutes with wireless charging, but the X60 Pro+’s longer runtime is more valuable for power users.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo X60 Pro+ if you need exceptional battery endurance for heavy daily use, and prioritize a consistently strong camera experience across both photo and video. Buy the Oppo Find X3 Pro if you value the absolute fastest charging speeds available, including wireless options, and appreciate a display with a theoretically infinite contrast ratio, even if it’s only marginally brighter.