vivo X60 Pro+ vs OnePlus 9 Pro: A Deep Dive into Flagship Performance
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the OnePlus 9 Pro emerges as the slightly more compelling choice. Its 65W wired and 50W wireless charging capabilities significantly outperform the vivo X60 Pro+'s 55W wired charging, addressing a key pain point for power users. While the X60 Pro+ boasts a marginally better endurance rating, the convenience of faster charging tips the scales in OnePlus's favor.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo X60 Pro+ | OnePlus 9 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1800 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 - International | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - EU |
| 5G bands | 1, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 78 SA/NSA - EU |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat20 2000/200 Mbps, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| - | 1, 3, 28, 41, 78, 79 SA/NSA - CN | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, January 21 | 2021, March 23 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, January 30 | Available. Released 2021, March 30 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, eco leather back, aluminum frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 158.6 x 73.4 x 9.1 mm (6.24 x 2.89 x 0.36 in) | 163.2 x 73.6 x 8.7 mm (6.43 x 2.90 x 0.34 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 191 g (6.74 oz) | 197 g (6.95 oz) |
| - | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2376 pixels (~398 ppi density) | 1440 x 3216 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~525 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.56 inches, 104.6 cm2 (~89.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 108.4 cm2 (~90.3% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1300 nits (peak) | LTPO Fluid2 AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1300 nits (peak) |
| - | Always-on display | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-X1 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55 | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-X1 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55 |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888 5G (5 nm) | Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888 5G (5 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 660 | Adreno 660 |
| OS | Android 11, Funtouch 12 (International), OriginOS 1.0 (China) | Android 11, upgradable to Android 14, OxygenOS 14 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| - | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, Zeiss optics, Zeiss T* lens coating, Pixel Shift, dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, Hasselblad Color Calibration, dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 50 MP, f/1.6, (wide), 1/1.31", 1.2µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/3.4, 125mm (periscope telephoto), 1/4.0", PDAF, OIS, 5x optical zoom 32 MP, f/2.1, 50mm (telephoto), 1/2.8", 0.8µm, PDAF, 2x optical zoom 48 MP, f/2.2, 114˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, gimbal OIS, PDAF | 48 MP, f/1.8, 23mm (wide), 1/1.43", 1.12µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.4, 77mm (telephoto), 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS, 3.3x optical zoom 50 MP, f/2.2, 14mm (ultrawide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, AF 2 MP, f/2.4, (monochrome) |
| Single | - | 16 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 8K@30fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS, HDR10+ | 8K@30fps, 4K@30/60/120fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps, Auto HDR, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.5, 24mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | 16 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| - | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, NavIC | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1), GALILEO (E1+E5a) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct, DLNA |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 55W wired | 65W wired, PD, 100% in 29 min 50W wireless, 100% in 43 min 5W reverse wireless |
| Type | 4200 mAh | Li-Po 4500 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Orange, Emperor Blue | Morning Mist, Forest Green, Stellar Black |
| Models | V2056A, V2047 | LE2121, LE2125, LE2123, LE2120, LE2127 |
| Price | About 800 EUR | € 246.17 / $ 264.95 / £ 287.00 |
| SAR | 0.80 W/kg (head) 0.47 W/kg (body) | - |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 86h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Loudspeaker | - | -24.1 LUFS (Very good) |
vivo X60 Pro+
- Slightly better battery endurance (91h rating)
- Potentially superior camera image processing
- Unique and distinctive design
- Slower charging speeds compared to OnePlus 9 Pro
- Less refined software experience (potentially)
- Limited wireless charging capabilities
OnePlus 9 Pro
- Significantly faster wired and wireless charging
- Smoother and more optimized OxygenOS software
- Reverse wireless charging capability
- Slightly lower battery endurance (86h rating)
- Camera image processing may not be as detailed
- More mainstream design aesthetic
Display Comparison
Both devices feature excellent displays, utilizing high-quality panels with a measured peak brightness around 816 nits (vivo) and 859 nits (OnePlus). The difference in brightness is minimal and unlikely to be noticeable in most real-world scenarios. While neither explicitly states LTPO technology, both likely employ variable refresh rate technology to optimize power consumption. The OnePlus 9 Pro's display benefits from a slightly higher peak brightness, potentially offering better visibility in direct sunlight. Bezels are similarly slim on both devices, contributing to an immersive viewing experience.
Camera Comparison
Both phones are equipped with versatile camera systems, but the X60 Pro+ appears to lean more heavily into photographic capabilities. While both offer photo and video recording, the X60 Pro+’s camera system is likely to have a more sophisticated image processing pipeline geared towards detail and dynamic range. The OnePlus 9 Pro’s collaboration with Hasselblad aimed to improve color science, but the X60 Pro+’s sensor configuration and processing may provide a slight edge in challenging lighting conditions. The absence of detailed sensor information in the provided data makes a definitive comparison difficult, but the X60 Pro+’s positioning suggests a stronger focus on camera quality.
Performance
At the heart of both phones lies the Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888 5G (5 nm) chipset, paired with an identical CPU configuration: an octa-core setup featuring a Cortex-X1 prime core, three Cortex-A78 performance cores, and four Cortex-A55 efficiency cores. This means raw processing power is virtually identical. However, OnePlus's optimized OxygenOS and potentially more aggressive thermal management could lead to slightly sustained performance during extended gaming sessions. Both utilize LPDDR5 RAM, ensuring snappy multitasking. The real-world performance difference will likely be minimal, with both phones handling demanding tasks with ease.
Battery Life
The vivo X60 Pro+ achieves an endurance rating of 91 hours, slightly surpassing the OnePlus 9 Pro’s 86 hours. This suggests the X60 Pro+ offers a bit more longevity on a single charge. However, the OnePlus 9 Pro compensates with significantly faster charging speeds: 65W wired (fully charging in 29 minutes), 50W wireless (43 minutes), and even 5W reverse wireless charging. The X60 Pro+ is limited to 55W wired charging. This difference in charging speed is a major advantage for the OnePlus 9 Pro, allowing users to quickly top up their battery when needed, effectively mitigating the slightly lower endurance rating.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo X60 Pro+ if you prioritize camera versatility and slightly longer battery life between charges, and appreciate a more unique design aesthetic. You'll benefit from a phone geared towards photography enthusiasts. Buy the OnePlus 9 Pro if you value blazing-fast charging speeds (both wired and wireless), a smoother software experience with OxygenOS, and a more mainstream, polished design. This is the phone for users who demand convenience and consistent performance.