vivo X60 Pro vs Xiaomi Mi 11i: A Deep Dive into Flagship Performance and Value
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing all-day battery life and a consistently smooth experience, the Xiaomi Mi 11i emerges as the better choice. Its 96-hour endurance rating significantly surpasses the vivo X60 Pro’s 91 hours, and the Snapdragon 888, despite potential thermal concerns, offers a performance edge. However, users heavily invested in photography may find the X60 Pro’s camera system more appealing.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo X60 Pro | Xiaomi Mi 11i |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41 - International | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 7, 28, 40, 41, 78 SA/NSA - International | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| 1, 3, 28, 38, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA - China | - | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, March 22 | 2021, March 29 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, April 02 | Available. Released 2021, May 31 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Schott Xensation Up), glass back, aluminum frame | - |
| Dimensions | 158.6 x 73.2 x 7.6 mm (6.24 x 2.88 x 0.30 in) | 163.7 x 76.4 x 7.8 mm (6.44 x 3.01 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 179 g (6.31 oz) | 196 g (6.91 oz) |
| - | IP53, dust and splash resistant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Schott Xensation Up | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2376 pixels (~398 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.56 inches, 104.6 cm2 (~90.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~85.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+ | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 900 nits (HBM), 1300 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Kryo 585 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 585 & 4x1.80 GHz Kryo 585) | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-X1 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8250-AC Snapdragon 870 5G (7 nm) | Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888 5G (5 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 650 | Adreno 660 |
| OS | Android 11, Funtouch 11.1 | Android 11, MIUI 12 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Zeiss optics, color spectrum sensor, Pixel Shift, LED flash, HDR, panorama | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 48 MP, f/1.5, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF, gimbal OIS 13 MP, f/2.5, 50mm (telephoto), 1/2.8", 0.8µm, PDAF, 2x optical zoom 13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚, 16mm (ultrawide) | - |
| Single | - | 20 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.4", 0.8µm |
| Triple | - | 108 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide) 5 MP, f/2.4, 50mm (telephoto macro), 1/5.0", 1.12µm, AF |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS | 8K@30fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240/960fps, gyro-EIS, HDR10+ |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.5, 24mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | 20 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.4", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, 720p@120fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 32-bit/192kHz audio | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS, NavIC | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Virtual proximity sensing | - | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 33W wired | 33W wired, PD3.0, QC3, 100% in 52 min |
| Type | 4200 mAh | Li-Po 4520 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Midnight Black, Shimmer Blue | Celestial Silver, Frosty White, Cosmic Black |
| Models | V2046 | M2012K11G |
| Price | About 570 EUR | About 230 EUR |
| SAR | 0.53 W/kg (head) 0.81 W/kg (body) | 0.95 W/kg (head) 0.74 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.57 W/kg (head) 0.77 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | Endurance rating 91h | Endurance rating 96h |
| Camera | Photo / Video | Photo / Video |
| Display | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | -27.6 LUFS (Good) | -26.0 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 734811 (v8) GeekBench: 3749 (v5.1) GFXBench: 62fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | AnTuTu: 690021 (v8) GeekBench: 3641 (v5.1) |
vivo X60 Pro
- Excellent battery life (91h endurance)
- Potentially superior camera image processing
- Thermally efficient Snapdragon 870
- Lower peak display brightness
- Less powerful chipset compared to Snapdragon 888
Xiaomi Mi 11i
- Brighter display (939 nits)
- More powerful Snapdragon 888 processor
- Faster charging (52 min 0-100%)
- Shorter battery life (96h endurance)
- Potential for thermal throttling
Display Comparison
Both the vivo X60 Pro and Xiaomi Mi 11i feature displays with an 'Infinite' contrast ratio, typical for OLED panels. However, the Mi 11i boasts a significantly higher peak brightness of 939 nits compared to the X60 Pro’s 818 nits. This translates to better visibility under direct sunlight. While both offer excellent viewing experiences, the Mi 11i’s brighter display provides a noticeable advantage in outdoor scenarios. Details regarding refresh rates and panel technology (LTPO) are missing, but both likely utilize 120Hz AMOLED panels common in this price bracket.
Camera Comparison
Both phones are listed as having Photo/Video capabilities, but detailed sensor information is absent. Given vivo’s reputation, the X60 Pro likely prioritizes image processing and color science, potentially offering a more refined photographic experience. The Mi 11i, leveraging the Snapdragon 888’s ISP, may excel in video recording and computational photography. Without specific sensor size or aperture data, it’s difficult to definitively declare a winner, but the X60 Pro’s brand positioning suggests a stronger focus on camera quality. The absence of details regarding OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) is a significant omission.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets: the Xiaomi Mi 11i packs the Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 (5nm), while the vivo X60 Pro utilizes the Snapdragon 870 (7nm). The 5nm process of the 888 theoretically offers better power efficiency and transistor density, leading to higher performance. The Mi 11i’s CPU configuration, with a Cortex-X1 prime core, provides a performance boost over the X60 Pro’s Kryo 585 setup. However, the Snapdragon 888 is known to generate more heat, potentially leading to thermal throttling during sustained workloads. The X60 Pro’s 870, while less powerful, is more thermally efficient, offering consistent performance over longer periods. Both devices likely utilize LPDDR5 RAM, but specific speeds are not provided.
Battery Life
The Xiaomi Mi 11i’s 96-hour endurance rating is a clear win over the vivo X60 Pro’s 91 hours. Despite both supporting 33W wired charging, the Mi 11i boasts a 52-minute 0-100% charge time, indicating optimized charging circuitry and potentially a slightly different battery capacity. While the exact mAh capacities are unknown, the Mi 11i’s superior endurance suggests a more efficient combination of battery size and power management. The inclusion of PD3.0 and QC3 support on the Mi 11i adds to its charging versatility.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo X60 Pro if you need exceptional battery endurance and a refined camera experience, even if it means sacrificing some peak processing power. This phone is ideal for content creators and users who frequently rely on their phone throughout the day. Buy the Xiaomi Mi 11i if you prioritize raw performance for gaming and demanding applications, and are willing to accept slightly shorter battery life. This is the phone for power users and mobile gamers.