vivo X60 Pro vs. Sony Xperia 1 III: Which Flagship Reigns Supreme?
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing all-day battery life and a smooth, efficient experience, the vivo X60 Pro emerges as the winner. Its 91-hour endurance rating and Snapdragon 870 chipset offer a compelling package. However, the Xperia 1 III caters to a niche audience demanding advanced camera controls and a premium multimedia experience.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo X60 Pro | Sony Xperia 1 III |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41 - International | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 46, 66 - Europe |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 7, 28, 40, 41, 78 SA/NSA - International | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - Europe |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| 1, 3, 28, 38, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA - China | SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave - USA (specific) | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, March 22 | 2021, April 14 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, April 02 | Available. Released 2021, August 25 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Schott Xensation Up), glass back, aluminum frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), glass back (Gorilla Glass 6), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 158.6 x 73.2 x 7.6 mm (6.24 x 2.88 x 0.30 in) | 165 x 71 x 8.2 mm (6.50 x 2.80 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 179 g (6.31 oz) | 186 g / 187.1 g (mmWave) (6.56 oz) |
| - | IP65/IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Schott Xensation Up | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2376 pixels (~398 ppi density) | 1644 x 3840 pixels, 21:9 ratio (~643 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.56 inches, 104.6 cm2 (~90.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.5 inches, 98.6 cm2 (~84.2% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+ | OLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR BT.2020 |
| - | Runs at 1096 x 2560 pixels except for select use cases | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Kryo 585 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 585 & 4x1.80 GHz Kryo 585) | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-X1 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8250-AC Snapdragon 870 5G (7 nm) | Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888 5G (5 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 650 | Adreno 660 |
| OS | Android 11, Funtouch 11.1 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 13 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.X | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Zeiss optics, color spectrum sensor, Pixel Shift, LED flash, HDR, panorama | Zeiss optics, Zeiss T* lens coating, color spectrum sensor, LED flash, panorama, HDR, eye tracking |
| Quad | 48 MP, f/1.5, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF, gimbal OIS 13 MP, f/2.5, 50mm (telephoto), 1/2.8", 0.8µm, PDAF, 2x optical zoom 13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚, 16mm (ultrawide) | - |
| Single | - | 8 MP, f/2.0, 24mm (wide), 1/4", 1.12µm |
| Triple | - | 12 MP, f/1.7, 24mm (wide), 1/1.7", 1.8µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 12 MP, f/2.3, 70mm (telephoto), f/2.8, 105mm (telephoto), 1/2.9", dual pixel PDAF, 3x/4.4x optical zoom, OIS 12 MP, f/2.2, 124˚, 16mm (ultrawide), 1/2.6", dual pixel PDAF 0.3 MP, TOF 3D, (depth) |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@24/25/30/60/120fps HDR, 1080p@30/60/120fps; 5-axis gyro-EIS, OIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.5, 24mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | 8 MP, f/2.0, 24mm (wide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, 5-axis gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | Yes |
| 35mm jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 32-bit/192kHz audio | 24-bit/192kHz audio Dynamic vibration system | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS, NavIC | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG, video output |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct, DLNA |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, barometer, compass |
| Virtual proximity sensing | Native Sony Alpha camera support | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 33W wired | 30W wired, PD, 50% in 30 min Wireless Reverse wireless |
| Type | 4200 mAh | Li-Po 4500 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Midnight Black, Shimmer Blue | Frosted Black, Frosted Gray, Frosted Purple |
| Models | V2046 | XQBC62/V, XQBC52V.UKCX, SO-51B, SOG03, A101SO, XQ-BC62, XQ-BC72, XQ-BC52, XQ-BC01, XQ-BC11, XQ-BC21, XQ-BC72 |
| Price | About 570 EUR | € 505.26 / $ 903.43 |
| SAR | 0.53 W/kg (head) 0.81 W/kg (body) | - |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | Endurance rating 91h | Endurance rating 82h |
| Camera | Photo / Video | Photo / Video |
| Display | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | -27.6 LUFS (Good) | -26.5 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 734811 (v8) GeekBench: 3749 (v5.1) GFXBench: 62fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | AnTuTu: 607423 (v8) GeekBench: 3515 (v5.1) GFXBench: 54fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo X60 Pro
- Exceptional battery life (91h endurance)
- More affordable price point
- Efficient Snapdragon 870 chipset
- Lacks wireless charging
- Lower peak display brightness
Sony Xperia 1 III
- Pro-grade camera features and manual controls
- 120Hz display for smoother visuals
- Wireless and reverse wireless charging
- Potential for thermal throttling with Snapdragon 888
- Slightly lower battery endurance (82h)
Display Comparison
The Xperia 1 III’s 620 nits of measured brightness falls short of the vivo X60 Pro’s 818 nits, meaning the X60 Pro will offer superior visibility in direct sunlight. Both displays share an 'Infinite' contrast ratio, typical of OLED panels, but the Xperia 1 III’s focus on color accuracy, a Sony hallmark, may appeal to professionals. While neither spec sheet details refresh rate, the Xperia 1 III is known for its 120Hz panel, a feature absent from the X60 Pro. This impacts scrolling smoothness and gaming responsiveness.
Camera Comparison
Both phones offer versatile camera systems, but their approaches differ. While both are capable of Photo and Video, the Xperia 1 III’s strength lies in its manual controls and pro-level features, leveraging Sony’s Alpha camera technology. The X60 Pro, while capable, focuses on computational photography and ease of use. Without detailed sensor information, it’s difficult to make a direct comparison, but the Xperia 1 III’s emphasis on optical image stabilization (OIS) and variable telephoto lenses suggests a more sophisticated photographic experience. The X60 Pro likely relies more heavily on software processing.
Performance
The Sony Xperia 1 III boasts the Snapdragon 888 (5nm) versus the vivo X60 Pro’s Snapdragon 870 (7nm). The 5nm process theoretically provides better power efficiency, but the 888 is known for thermal throttling under sustained load. The Xperia 1 III’s Cortex-X1 prime core (2.84 GHz) offers a performance edge in single-core tasks, while the X60 Pro’s Kryo 585 (3.2 GHz) is competitive. Real-world performance will depend on thermal management, and the X60 Pro’s larger process node may offer more consistent performance over extended periods. Both utilize octa-core CPUs, but the architectural differences favor the Xperia 1 III in raw processing power.
Battery Life
The Xperia 1 III’s 82-hour endurance rating is marginally better than the X60 Pro’s 91-hour rating, a surprising result given the more power-efficient chipset in the Xperia. This suggests the X60 Pro’s software optimization and potentially larger battery capacity (not specified) contribute to its longer runtime. The Xperia 1 III offers 30W wired charging with a 50% charge in 30 minutes, alongside wireless and reverse wireless charging. The X60 Pro’s 33W wired charging is slightly faster, but lacks wireless charging options. The X60 Pro’s superior endurance rating mitigates the lack of wireless charging for many users.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo X60 Pro if you need exceptional battery life, a consistently smooth user experience, and a more affordable price point. It’s ideal for daily drivers, social media enthusiasts, and those who value longevity. Buy the Sony Xperia 1 III if you prioritize professional-grade camera features, a truly immersive multimedia experience with its display, and don't mind managing battery life more carefully. It’s geared towards photographers, videographers, and content creators.