vivo X60 Pro vs OnePlus 9 Pro: A Deep Dive into Flagship Performance and Value
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the OnePlus 9 Pro emerges as the stronger choice. Its Snapdragon 888 provides a performance edge, and the incredibly fast 65W wired and 50W wireless charging are game-changers. However, the vivo X60 Pro’s superior battery endurance and potentially more refined software experience make it a compelling alternative for those prioritizing longevity.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo X60 Pro | OnePlus 9 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1800 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41 - International | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - EU |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 7, 28, 40, 41, 78 SA/NSA - International | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 78 SA/NSA - EU |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat20 2000/200 Mbps, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| 1, 3, 28, 38, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA - China | 1, 3, 28, 41, 78, 79 SA/NSA - CN | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, March 22 | 2021, March 23 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, April 02 | Available. Released 2021, March 30 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Schott Xensation Up), glass back, aluminum frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 158.6 x 73.2 x 7.6 mm (6.24 x 2.88 x 0.30 in) | 163.2 x 73.6 x 8.7 mm (6.43 x 2.90 x 0.34 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 179 g (6.31 oz) | 197 g (6.95 oz) |
| - | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Schott Xensation Up | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2376 pixels (~398 ppi density) | 1440 x 3216 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~525 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.56 inches, 104.6 cm2 (~90.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 108.4 cm2 (~90.3% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+ | LTPO Fluid2 AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1300 nits (peak) |
| - | Always-on display | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Kryo 585 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 585 & 4x1.80 GHz Kryo 585) | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-X1 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55 |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8250-AC Snapdragon 870 5G (7 nm) | Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888 5G (5 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 650 | Adreno 660 |
| OS | Android 11, Funtouch 11.1 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 14, OxygenOS 14 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Zeiss optics, color spectrum sensor, Pixel Shift, LED flash, HDR, panorama | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, Hasselblad Color Calibration, dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 48 MP, f/1.5, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF, gimbal OIS 13 MP, f/2.5, 50mm (telephoto), 1/2.8", 0.8µm, PDAF, 2x optical zoom 13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚, 16mm (ultrawide) | 48 MP, f/1.8, 23mm (wide), 1/1.43", 1.12µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.4, 77mm (telephoto), 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS, 3.3x optical zoom 50 MP, f/2.2, 14mm (ultrawide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, AF 2 MP, f/2.4, (monochrome) |
| Single | - | 16 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS | 8K@30fps, 4K@30/60/120fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps, Auto HDR, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.5, 24mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | 16 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 32-bit/192kHz audio | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS, NavIC | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1), GALILEO (E1+E5a) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct, DLNA |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Virtual proximity sensing | - | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 33W wired | 65W wired, PD, 100% in 29 min 50W wireless, 100% in 43 min 5W reverse wireless |
| Type | 4200 mAh | Li-Po 4500 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Midnight Black, Shimmer Blue | Morning Mist, Forest Green, Stellar Black |
| Models | V2046 | LE2121, LE2125, LE2123, LE2120, LE2127 |
| Price | About 570 EUR | € 246.17 / $ 264.95 / £ 287.00 |
| SAR | 0.53 W/kg (head) 0.81 W/kg (body) | - |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | Endurance rating 91h | Endurance rating 86h |
| Camera | Photo / Video | Photo / Video |
| Display | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) | - |
| Loudspeaker | -27.6 LUFS (Good) | -24.1 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 734811 (v8) GeekBench: 3749 (v5.1) GFXBench: 62fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | - |
vivo X60 Pro
- Exceptional battery endurance (91h rating)
- Potentially better thermal management with Snapdragon 870
- Smooth and efficient performance for everyday tasks
- Slower charging speeds (33W wired)
- Less powerful chipset compared to Snapdragon 888
OnePlus 9 Pro
- Faster Snapdragon 888 processor for demanding tasks
- Blazing-fast 65W wired and 50W wireless charging
- Hasselblad-tuned camera system
- Slightly lower battery endurance (86h rating)
- Potential for thermal throttling under heavy load
Display Comparison
Both phones feature excellent displays, with the OnePlus 9 Pro achieving a slightly higher peak brightness of 859 nits compared to the vivo X60 Pro’s 818 nits. While both offer an 'infinite' (nominal) contrast ratio, the real-world difference in viewing experience is minimal. Neither specification details refresh rate or panel technology (LTPO), but both are expected to be high refresh rate panels. The OnePlus 9 Pro’s slightly brighter display may be more visible in direct sunlight, but the X60 Pro’s panel is still more than adequate for most users.
Camera Comparison
Both phones are equipped with versatile camera systems, but detailed sensor information is limited. Both are described as having Photo/Video capabilities. The OnePlus 9 Pro’s collaboration with Hasselblad suggests a focus on color science and image processing. Without specific sensor size or aperture details, it’s difficult to definitively declare a winner. The absence of information regarding OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) on either device is a significant omission. The lack of detail on the camera systems makes a direct comparison challenging, but the OnePlus 9 Pro’s Hasselblad partnership suggests a potential edge in image quality.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The OnePlus 9 Pro boasts the Snapdragon 888 (5nm), while the vivo X60 Pro utilizes the Snapdragon 870 (7nm). The 5nm process of the 888 theoretically offers better power efficiency and higher transistor density, translating to a performance advantage in demanding tasks. The OnePlus 9 Pro’s CPU, with its Cortex-X1 prime core, further enhances this lead. However, the Snapdragon 888 is known to throttle under sustained load, a potential drawback the 870 may avoid due to its lower thermal output. The OnePlus 9 Pro’s LPDDR5 RAM is standard for flagships, while the X60 Pro’s RAM specification is not provided, but is likely similar.
Battery Life
The OnePlus 9 Pro offers a significant advantage in charging speed, with 65W wired charging capable of a full charge in just 29 minutes, alongside 50W wireless charging (43 minutes) and 5W reverse wireless. The vivo X60 Pro’s 33W wired charging is considerably slower. However, the X60 Pro boasts a superior endurance rating of 91 hours compared to the OnePlus 9 Pro’s 86 hours. This suggests that despite a potentially smaller battery capacity (not specified), the more efficient Snapdragon 870 and software optimizations contribute to longer battery life.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo X60 Pro if you prioritize all-day battery life and a smooth, consistent experience over raw processing power. It’s ideal for users who frequently travel or rely heavily on their phone throughout the day. Buy the OnePlus 9 Pro if you demand the fastest possible performance for gaming and demanding applications, and if rapid charging is a critical feature. This phone caters to power users who want to minimize downtime.