Xiaomi Mi 11 Pro vs. vivo X60 Pro: A Head-to-Head Flagship Battle
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Xiaomi Mi 11 Pro emerges as the stronger contender. Its Snapdragon 888 chipset delivers superior raw performance, and the significantly faster 67W wired and wireless charging capabilities provide a substantial convenience advantage. While the X60 Pro is a capable device, the Mi 11 Pro’s broader feature set justifies its position.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo X60 Pro (China) | Xiaomi Mi 11 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 26, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42 - China |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 28, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA - China |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA 800 & TD-SCDMA | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2020, December 29. Released 2021, January 08 | 2021, March 29 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2021, April 02 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 6), glass back (Gorilla Glass 6), aluminum frame | - |
| Dimensions | 158.6 x 73.2 x 7.6 mm (6.24 x 2.88 x 0.30 in) | 164.3 x 74.6 x 8.5 mm (6.47 x 2.94 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 178 g (6.28 oz) | 208 g (7.34 oz) |
| - | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 6 | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2376 pixels (~398 ppi density) | 1440 x 3200 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~515 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.56 inches, 104.6 cm2 (~90.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.81 inches, 112.0 cm2 (~91.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+ | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, 1500 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.8 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-X1 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Exynos 1080 (5 nm) | Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888 5G (5 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G78 MP10 | Adreno 660 |
| OS | Android 11, OriginOS 1.0 | Android 11, MIUI 12.5 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Zeiss optics, color spectrum sensor, Pixel Shift, LED flash, HDR, panorama | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 48 MP, f/1.5, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/3.4, 125mm (periscope telephoto), 1/4.0", PDAF, OIS, 5x optical zoom 13 MP, f/2.5, 50mm (telephoto), 1/2.8", 0.8µm, PDAF, 2x optical zoom 13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚, 16mm (ultrawide) | - |
| Single | - | 20 MP, f/2.2, 27mm (wide), 1/3.4", 0.8µm |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/2.0, 24mm (wide), 1/1.12", 1.4µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 8 MP, 120mm (periscope telephoto), PDAF, OIS, 5x optical zoom 13 MP, f/2.4, 16mm, 123˚ (ultrawide) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 8K@24fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS, HDR10+ rec. |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.5, 24mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | 20 MP, f/2.2, 27mm (wide), 1/3.4", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/60fps, 720p@120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 32-bit/192kHz audio | 24-bit/192kHz audio Tuned by Harman Kardon | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct, DLNA |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Virtual proximity sensing | - | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 33W wired | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC4, 100% in 36 min 67W wireless, 100% in 39 min 10W reverse wireless |
| Type | 4200 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Gray, Aurora | Black, Green, Purple |
| Models | V2047A | M2102K1AC |
| Price | About 640 EUR | About 370 EUR |
vivo X60 Pro (China)
- Faster 33W wired charging offers quicker top-ups.
- Exynos 1080 may exhibit better thermal management.
- Potentially optimized camera software for natural-looking images.
- Significantly slower charging compared to the Mi 11 Pro.
- Less powerful chipset for demanding tasks and gaming.
- Limited information on display specifications.
Xiaomi Mi 11 Pro
- Snapdragon 888 delivers superior performance.
- 67W wired and wireless charging for unparalleled convenience.
- Likely features a higher-resolution and brighter display.
- Snapdragon 888 is prone to thermal throttling.
- May require more frequent charging due to higher power consumption.
- Potentially less refined camera image processing.
Display Comparison
While both devices likely feature high-quality AMOLED panels, specific details like peak brightness and refresh rate are missing for the X60 Pro. The Mi 11 Pro boasts a 2K resolution display, ensuring exceptional sharpness. The Snapdragon 888’s ISP is optimized for handling the higher resolution, potentially leading to better image processing. The Mi 11 Pro’s display technology is likely to offer a wider color gamut and higher peak brightness, enhancing HDR content viewing. The absence of LTPO information for the X60 Pro means it may not dynamically adjust refresh rates as efficiently as some competitors, potentially impacting battery life.
Camera Comparison
Detailed camera specs are limited, but the Mi 11 Pro is expected to feature a larger main sensor, likely a 50MP or 108MP unit, benefiting from the Snapdragon 888’s advanced image signal processor. The X60 Pro’s camera system is likely optimized for computational photography and low-light performance. The Mi 11 Pro’s larger sensor size will capture more light, resulting in better dynamic range and detail in challenging conditions. The Snapdragon 888’s ISP also supports 8K video recording, a feature potentially absent on the X60 Pro. The absence of information on OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) for both devices makes it difficult to assess their video stabilization capabilities.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets: the Xiaomi Mi 11 Pro utilizes the Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G (5nm), while the vivo X60 Pro features the Exynos 1080 (5nm). The Snapdragon 888’s Cortex-X1 prime core, clocked at 2.84 GHz, provides a performance edge over the X60 Pro’s Cortex-A78 prime core at 2.8 GHz. The Snapdragon 888’s Adreno 660 GPU is also significantly more powerful than the Mali-G78 MP14 in the Exynos 1080, translating to higher frame rates in demanding games. However, the Snapdragon 888 is known to generate more heat, potentially leading to thermal throttling during sustained workloads. The Exynos 1080, while less powerful, may offer better sustained performance due to its improved thermal efficiency. Both devices utilize LPDDR5 RAM, but the speed and configuration could vary, impacting multitasking performance.
Battery Life
The Xiaomi Mi 11 Pro’s charging capabilities are a standout feature, offering 67W wired charging (0-100% in 36 minutes), 67W wireless charging (0-100% in 39 minutes), and 10W reverse wireless charging. The vivo X60 Pro is limited to 33W wired charging, a significant disadvantage in terms of convenience. While battery capacity isn’t specified, the Mi 11 Pro’s faster charging mitigates the impact of a potentially smaller battery. The Mi 11 Pro’s support for PD3.0 and QC4 ensures compatibility with a wider range of chargers.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo X60 Pro (China) if you prioritize a smooth, responsive experience and a well-tuned camera system, and are comfortable with potentially slower charging speeds. Buy the Xiaomi Mi 11 Pro if you demand maximum performance for gaming and demanding applications, and value the convenience of incredibly fast wired and wireless charging. The Mi 11 Pro is the better choice for power users and those who frequently rely on their phone throughout the day.