Oppo Find X3 Pro vs. vivo X60 Pro: Which Flagship Reigns Supreme?
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Oppo Find X3 Pro emerges as the stronger choice. Its Snapdragon 888 chipset provides a performance edge, coupled with significantly faster 65W wired and 30W wireless charging. While the X60 Pro offers a respectable experience, the Find X3 Pro’s superior charging and overall processing power justify its position.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo X60 Pro (China) | Oppo Find X3 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 26, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA 800 & TD-SCDMA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA - China | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2020, December 29. Released 2021, January 08 | 2021, March 11 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2021, March 19 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 6), glass back (Gorilla Glass 6), aluminum frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 158.6 x 73.2 x 7.6 mm (6.24 x 2.88 x 0.30 in) | 163.6 x 74 x 8.3 mm (6.44 x 2.91 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM |
| Weight | 178 g (6.28 oz) | 193 g (6.81 oz) |
| - | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 6 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2376 pixels (~398 ppi density) | 1440 x 3216 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~525 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.56 inches, 104.6 cm2 (~90.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 108.4 cm2 (~89.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+ | LTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, BT.2020, 500 nits (typ), 1300 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.8 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-X1 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Exynos 1080 (5 nm) | Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888 5G (5 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G78 MP10 | Adreno 660 |
| OS | Android 11, OriginOS 1.0 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 14, ColorOS 14 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Zeiss optics, color spectrum sensor, Pixel Shift, LED flash, HDR, panorama | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 48 MP, f/1.5, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/3.4, 125mm (periscope telephoto), 1/4.0", PDAF, OIS, 5x optical zoom 13 MP, f/2.5, 50mm (telephoto), 1/2.8", 0.8µm, PDAF, 2x optical zoom 13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚, 16mm (ultrawide) | 50 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.4, 52mm (telephoto), 1/3.4", 1.0µm, 2x optical zoom, PDAF 50 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 110˚ (ultrawide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF 3 MP, f/3.0, (microscope), AF, ring flash, 60x magnification |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps; gyro-EIS; HDR, 10‑bit video |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | Panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.5, 24mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | 32 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 32-bit/192kHz audio | - | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Virtual proximity sensing | - | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 33W wired | 65W wired, PD, 40% in 10 min 30W wireless, 100% in 80 min 10W reverse wireless |
| Type | 4200 mAh | Li-Po 4500 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Gray, Aurora | Gloss Black, Blue, White, Cosmic Mocha, Mars Edition, Photographer Edition |
| Models | V2047A | CPH2173, PEEM00, OPG03 |
| Price | About 640 EUR | About 200 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 81h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -25.4 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 656467 (v8) GeekBench: 3316 (v5.1) GFXBench: 33fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo X60 Pro (China)
- Potentially smoother software experience (China-focused)
- Efficient Exynos 1080 chipset
- Competitive battery endurance
- Slower 33W charging
- Less powerful chipset compared to Snapdragon 888
- Limited global availability
Oppo Find X3 Pro
- Powerful Snapdragon 888 processor
- Blazing-fast 65W wired and 30W wireless charging
- High peak display brightness
- Snapdragon 888 can be prone to throttling
- Potentially less optimized software for specific regions
- Higher price point (potentially)
Display Comparison
The Oppo Find X3 Pro boasts a measured peak brightness of 774 nits, suggesting a vibrant and easily viewable display even in bright sunlight. While the X60 Pro’s display specifications are not provided, Oppo’s history suggests a high-quality panel. The Find X3 Pro’s infinite (nominal) contrast ratio indicates excellent black levels. The absence of PWM frequency data for the X60 Pro makes it difficult to assess potential flicker-related eye strain compared to the Find X3 Pro, which likely employs a higher frequency PWM for smoother dimming.
Camera Comparison
Both phones are advertised as having strong photo and video capabilities, but detailed sensor information is lacking for both. The Find X3 Pro’s camera system likely benefits from Qualcomm’s image signal processor (ISP) within the Snapdragon 888, known for its advanced processing capabilities. Without specific sensor sizes or aperture details, it’s difficult to definitively declare a winner. However, the Find X3 Pro’s overall system integration and Qualcomm’s ISP give it a slight edge in image processing and potentially low-light performance. We can safely ignore the presence of 2MP macro cameras on either device, as their utility is minimal.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Oppo Find X3 Pro’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 (5nm) features a Cortex-X1 prime core clocked at 2.84 GHz, promising superior single-core performance compared to the vivo X60 Pro’s Exynos 1080. The Exynos 1080 utilizes a mix of Cortex-A78 cores (1x2.8 GHz, 3x2.6 GHz) and Cortex-A55 cores (4x2.0 GHz). While both are 5nm chips, the Snapdragon 888’s architecture, particularly the Cortex-X1, provides a noticeable advantage in demanding tasks. The Snapdragon 888 is known to generate more heat, potentially leading to throttling, but the Find X3 Pro’s cooling system likely mitigates this. The X60 Pro’s Exynos 1080 may offer better sustained performance due to lower peak temperatures.
Battery Life
Both devices achieve an endurance rating of 81 hours, suggesting comparable battery life despite differing charging capabilities. However, the Oppo Find X3 Pro’s charging prowess is a significant advantage. Its 65W wired charging can deliver a 40% charge in just 10 minutes, while the X60 Pro’s 33W charging is considerably slower. The Find X3 Pro also supports 30W wireless charging and 10W reverse wireless charging, features absent in the X60 Pro. This makes the Find X3 Pro far more convenient for users who frequently need to top up their battery quickly.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo X60 Pro (China) if you prioritize a potentially smoother software experience tailored for the Chinese ecosystem and are comfortable with slower 33W charging. Buy the Oppo Find X3 Pro if you demand top-tier performance from its Snapdragon 888, value blazing-fast 65W wired and 30W wireless charging, and appreciate a more globally-focused software experience.