Xiaomi Redmi K40 Pro+ vs vivo X60: A Head-to-Head Comparison of Flagship Power
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Xiaomi Redmi K40 Pro+ emerges as the stronger choice. The Snapdragon 888 offers a noticeable performance edge in demanding tasks and gaming, and its wider availability of software optimizations provides a more refined experience, despite both phones sharing the same 33W charging.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo X60 (China) | Xiaomi Redmi K40 Pro+ |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 26, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE-A, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA 800 & TD-SCDMA | CDMA2000 1x | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2020, December 29. Released 2021, January 08 | 2021, February 25 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2021, March 04 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 6), glass back (Gorilla Glass 6), plastic frame | - |
| Dimensions | 159.6 x 75 x 7.4 mm (6.28 x 2.95 x 0.29 in) | 163.7 x 76.4 x 7.8 mm (6.44 x 3.01 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) |
| Weight | 175.6 g (6.21 oz) | 196 g (6.91 oz) |
| - | IP53, dust and splash resistant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 6 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2376 pixels (~398 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.56 inches, 104.6 cm2 (~87.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~85.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+ | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1300 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.8 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-X1 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Exynos 1080 (5 nm) | Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888 5G (5 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G78 MP10 | Adreno 660 |
| OS | Android 11, OriginOS 1.0 | Android 11, MIUI 12 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Zeiss optics, color spectrum sensor, Pixel Shift, LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 48 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.5, 50mm (telephoto), 1/2.8", 0.8µm, PDAF, 2x optical zoom 13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚, 16mm (ultrawide) | - |
| Single | - | 20 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.4", 0.8µm |
| Triple | - | 108 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide) 5 MP, f/2.4, 50mm (macro), 1/5.0", 1.12µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 8K@30fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240/960fps, gyro-EIS, HDR10+ |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.5, 24mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | 20 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.4", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, 720p@120fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | - |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| - | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, color spectrum, barometer |
| Virtual proximity sensing | - | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 33W wired | 33W wired, PD3.0, QC3, 100% in 52 min (advertised) |
| Type | 4300 mAh | Li-Po 4520 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Gray, Aurora, White | Black, White, Aurora |
| Models | V2046A | - |
| Price | About 440 EUR | About 470 EUR |
vivo X60 (China)
- Potentially smoother software experience within the vivo ecosystem.
- Exynos 1080 offers good efficiency for everyday tasks.
- Sleek design and build quality (typical of vivo).
- Exynos 1080 is outperformed by the Snapdragon 888 in demanding scenarios.
- Limited global availability and software support.
Xiaomi Redmi K40 Pro+
- Snapdragon 888 delivers superior performance for gaming and multitasking.
- Wider software optimization and compatibility.
- PD3.0 and QC3 charging support for greater charger flexibility.
- Snapdragon 888 can generate more heat, potentially leading to throttling.
- Xiaomi’s MIUI software can be divisive.
Display Comparison
While both phones likely feature high-refresh-rate AMOLED displays (data not provided), the core difference lies in the processing power driving them. The chipset impacts the smoothness of animations and responsiveness. The Snapdragon 888’s Adreno 660 GPU will deliver a more consistent high-framerate experience in graphically demanding games. Without specific display specs, it's difficult to assess color accuracy or peak brightness, but both brands typically deliver vibrant and sharp visuals in this price segment.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications, a direct comparison is limited. However, the Redmi K40 Pro+ often features larger sensors in its flagship models, potentially capturing more light and detail. The Snapdragon 888’s image signal processor (ISP) is also generally considered more advanced, offering better noise reduction and dynamic range. While both phones likely include standard features like OIS, the K40 Pro+’s processing pipeline may offer more sophisticated computational photography capabilities. The presence of a 2MP macro camera on either device is largely inconsequential; image quality from these sensors is typically underwhelming.
Performance
The Xiaomi Redmi K40 Pro+’s Snapdragon 888 (5nm) holds a clear advantage over the vivo X60’s Exynos 1080 (5nm). The Snapdragon 888 utilizes a Cortex-X1 prime core clocked at 2.84 GHz, compared to the X60’s Cortex-A78 prime core at 2.8 GHz. This architectural difference, combined with the Snapdragon’s superior GPU, translates to faster application loading times and smoother multitasking. While both chips are fabricated on a 5nm process, the Snapdragon 888 is known to generate more heat, potentially leading to throttling under sustained load. However, Xiaomi’s cooling solutions are generally robust. The K40 Pro+ also benefits from potentially faster LPDDR5 RAM, further enhancing performance.
Battery Life
Both devices are equipped with 33W wired charging, advertised to reach 100% in approximately 52 minutes for the K40 Pro+. The actual battery life will depend on the battery capacity (not provided), usage patterns, and software optimization. The Snapdragon 888’s higher power consumption could slightly reduce the K40 Pro+'s battery endurance compared to the X60, but Xiaomi’s software features often include aggressive power management options. The inclusion of PD3.0 and QC3 support on the K40 Pro+ offers greater charging compatibility with a wider range of chargers.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo X60 (China) if you prioritize a potentially more refined software experience within the vivo ecosystem and are comfortable with the Exynos 1080’s performance profile. Buy the Xiaomi Redmi K40 Pro+ if you demand maximum performance for gaming and resource-intensive applications, and value the broader compatibility and optimization surrounding the Snapdragon 888 platform.