vivo X60 (China) vs Oppo Find X3 Pro: Which Flagship Reigns Supreme?
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Oppo Find X3 Pro is the superior choice. Its Snapdragon 888 offers a performance edge, coupled with significantly faster 65W wired and 30W wireless charging. While the X60’s Exynos 1080 is capable, the Find X3 Pro’s broader feature set and charging capabilities justify the price difference.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo X60 (China) | Oppo Find X3 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 26, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA 800 & TD-SCDMA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA - China | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2020, December 29. Released 2021, January 08 | 2021, March 11 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2021, March 19 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 6), glass back (Gorilla Glass 6), plastic frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 159.6 x 75 x 7.4 mm (6.28 x 2.95 x 0.29 in) | 163.6 x 74 x 8.3 mm (6.44 x 2.91 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM |
| Weight | 175.6 g (6.21 oz) | 193 g (6.81 oz) |
| - | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 6 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2376 pixels (~398 ppi density) | 1440 x 3216 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~525 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.56 inches, 104.6 cm2 (~87.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 108.4 cm2 (~89.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+ | LTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, BT.2020, 500 nits (typ), 1300 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.8 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-X1 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Exynos 1080 (5 nm) | Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888 5G (5 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G78 MP10 | Adreno 660 |
| OS | Android 11, OriginOS 1.0 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 14, ColorOS 14 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Zeiss optics, color spectrum sensor, Pixel Shift, LED flash, HDR, panorama | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 48 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.5, 50mm (telephoto), 1/2.8", 0.8µm, PDAF, 2x optical zoom 13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚, 16mm (ultrawide) | 50 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.4, 52mm (telephoto), 1/3.4", 1.0µm, 2x optical zoom, PDAF 50 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 110˚ (ultrawide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF 3 MP, f/3.0, (microscope), AF, ring flash, 60x magnification |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps; gyro-EIS; HDR, 10‑bit video |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | Panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.5, 24mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | 32 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Virtual proximity sensing | - | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 33W wired | 65W wired, PD, 40% in 10 min 30W wireless, 100% in 80 min 10W reverse wireless |
| Type | 4300 mAh | Li-Po 4500 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Gray, Aurora, White | Gloss Black, Blue, White, Cosmic Mocha, Mars Edition, Photographer Edition |
| Models | V2046A | CPH2173, PEEM00, OPG03 |
| Price | About 440 EUR | About 200 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 81h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -25.4 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 656467 (v8) GeekBench: 3316 (v5.1) GFXBench: 33fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo X60 (China)
- Potentially more efficient chipset (Exynos 1080)
- China-specific software optimizations
- Balanced performance profile
- Slower charging speeds (33W)
- China-specific software ecosystem
- Limited global availability
Oppo Find X3 Pro
- Superior performance (Snapdragon 888)
- Incredibly fast charging (65W wired, 30W wireless)
- Globally supported software
- Potential for thermal throttling
- Higher price point
- Snapdragon 888 can be power hungry
Display Comparison
The Oppo Find X3 Pro boasts a measured peak brightness of 774 nits, suggesting a more visible display in direct sunlight compared to the X60 (brightness data unavailable). While both likely utilize high-refresh-rate OLED panels, the Find X3 Pro’s infinite contrast ratio (nominal) indicates a superior viewing experience with deeper blacks. The absence of PWM dimming rate data for the X60 raises potential concerns for users sensitive to flicker, a detail the Find X3 Pro doesn’t explicitly address but is a common consideration in flagship displays.
Camera Comparison
Both phones are advertised as having strong photo and video capabilities, but detailed sensor information is lacking. The absence of specific sensor sizes and apertures makes a direct comparison difficult. However, the Find X3 Pro’s reputation suggests a more refined image processing pipeline and potentially superior low-light performance. The inclusion of OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) on both is expected, but the quality of implementation will vary. Ignoring the likely low-resolution macro cameras on both devices, the primary camera system’s performance will be the deciding factor, and the Find X3 Pro’s brand positioning suggests a more comprehensive camera experience.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Oppo Find X3 Pro’s Snapdragon 888 (5nm) features a Cortex-X1 prime core clocked at 2.84 GHz, offering a theoretical performance advantage over the vivo X60’s Exynos 1080. The Exynos 1080 utilizes a tri-cluster configuration with three Cortex-A78 cores at 2.6 GHz, aiming for efficiency. While both are 5nm chips, the Snapdragon 888’s architecture generally translates to better sustained performance and GPU capabilities. The Find X3 Pro’s LPDDR5 RAM (speed unspecified) complements the Snapdragon, ensuring smooth multitasking. Thermal management will be crucial for the Snapdragon 888, as it’s known to generate heat under sustained load, potentially leading to throttling – a factor the X60’s Exynos might mitigate to some extent.
Battery Life
Both devices achieve an endurance rating of 81 hours, indicating similar overall battery life despite differing battery capacities (unspecified for the X60). However, the charging speeds are drastically different. The Oppo Find X3 Pro’s 65W wired charging can deliver a 40% charge in just 10 minutes, and a full charge in approximately 80 minutes with its 30W wireless charging. The vivo X60’s 33W wired charging is significantly slower. The Find X3 Pro also offers 10W reverse wireless charging, a convenience feature absent on the X60. The faster charging speeds of the Find X3 Pro are a significant advantage for users who prioritize quick top-ups.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo X60 (China) if you prioritize a slightly more efficient chipset and are comfortable with the China-specific software ecosystem. It’s a good option for users who value a balanced experience and don’t require the absolute fastest charging speeds. Buy the Oppo Find X3 Pro if you demand top-tier performance, incredibly fast charging (both wired and wireless), and a more globally-supported software experience. It’s ideal for power users, gamers, and those who frequently rely on their phone throughout the day.