OnePlus 9RT 5G vs vivo X60: A Deep Dive into Performance and Value
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the OnePlus 9RT 5G emerges as the stronger choice. Its Snapdragon 888 chipset provides a noticeable performance edge, especially in demanding tasks like gaming, and its 65W charging is significantly faster than the vivo X60’s 33W solution. While the X60 offers a refined experience, the 9RT’s raw power and convenience are more impactful.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo X60 (China) | OnePlus 9RT 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1800 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 26, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 - Global |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 41, 78 SA/NSA - Global |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat18 1200/200 Mbps, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA 800 & TD-SCDMA | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2020, December 29. Released 2021, January 08 | 2021, October 13 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2021, October 19 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 6), glass back (Gorilla Glass 6), plastic frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 159.6 x 75 x 7.4 mm (6.28 x 2.95 x 0.29 in) | 162.2 x 74.6 x 8.3 mm (6.39 x 2.94 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 175.6 g (6.21 oz) | 198.5 g (7.02 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 6 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2376 pixels (~398 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~397 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.56 inches, 104.6 cm2 (~87.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.62 inches, 106.3 cm2 (~87.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+ | AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+ |
| - | Always-on display | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.8 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-X1 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Exynos 1080 (5 nm) | Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888 5G (5 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G78 MP10 | Adreno 660 |
| OS | Android 11, OriginOS 1.0 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 13, OxygenOS 13 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Zeiss optics, color spectrum sensor, Pixel Shift, LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 48 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.5, 50mm (telephoto), 1/2.8", 0.8µm, PDAF, 2x optical zoom 13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚, 16mm (ultrawide) | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56”, 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 16 MP, f/2.2, 14mm, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.6", 1.0µm 2 MP (macro) |
| Single | - | 16 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps, Auto HDR, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.5, 24mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | 16 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1), GALILEO (E1+E5a) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Virtual proximity sensing | - | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 33W wired | 65W wired, 100% in 29 min |
| Type | 4300 mAh | Li-Po 4500 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Gray, Aurora, White | Hacker Black, Nano Silver, Blue |
| Models | V2046A | MT2110, MT2111 |
| Price | About 440 EUR | About 590 EUR |
vivo X60 (China)
- Potentially more refined software experience (depending on ROM)
- Slightly more compact design
- Efficient Exynos 1080 chipset for everyday tasks
- Slower 33W charging
- Less powerful GPU for gaming
- Exynos 1080 may throttle under sustained load
OnePlus 9RT 5G
- Significantly faster 65W charging
- More powerful Snapdragon 888 chipset
- Superior GPU performance for gaming
- Likely better image processing capabilities
- Snapdragon 888 can run hotter
- Potentially larger footprint
- OxygenOS can be divisive (depending on user preference)
Display Comparison
Both devices are expected to feature high-quality AMOLED displays, though specific details like peak brightness and color accuracy aren't provided. However, the absence of LTPO technology in either device suggests a standard 120Hz refresh rate, potentially impacting battery life compared to adaptive refresh rate panels. Bezels are likely comparable, given both phones aim for a premium aesthetic. The display experience will likely hinge on software calibration, a known strength for OnePlus.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed sensor information, a direct comparison is challenging. However, the market positioning suggests both phones will feature capable camera systems. The Snapdragon 888’s ISP (Image Signal Processor) generally offers more advanced image processing capabilities, potentially leading to better dynamic range and low-light performance in the 9RT. The absence of information on OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) is a key omission; its presence would significantly benefit video recording and low-light photography on either device. We can assume both will have a primary wide-angle lens, but the quality of supporting lenses (ultrawide, macro) is likely to be similar and of lesser importance.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The OnePlus 9RT 5G boasts the Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G (5nm), featuring a Cortex-X1 prime core clocked at 2.84 GHz. This architecture is designed for peak performance. Conversely, the vivo X60 utilizes the Exynos 1080 (5nm), with a Cortex-A78 prime core at 2.8 GHz. While both are 5nm chips, the Snapdragon 888’s Cortex-X1 offers a significant architectural advantage in single-core performance. The 9RT’s Adreno 660 GPU also surpasses the Mali-G78 MP4 in the X60, translating to superior gaming performance. Thermal management will be crucial; the Snapdragon 888 is known to run hot, but OnePlus’s cooling solutions are generally effective. The 9RT likely benefits from faster LPDDR5 RAM, further enhancing responsiveness.
Battery Life
The OnePlus 9RT 5G’s 65W wired charging is a game-changer, achieving a full charge in just 29 minutes. This drastically reduces downtime compared to the vivo X60’s 33W charging. While battery capacity isn’t specified, the faster charging speed of the 9RT effectively mitigates any potential disadvantage from a slightly smaller battery. The Snapdragon 888’s power consumption is higher than the Exynos 1080, but the 9RT’s charging speed and optimized software likely offset this difference in real-world usage.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo X60 (China) if you prioritize a potentially more refined software experience (depending on your ROM choice) and a slightly more compact form factor. Buy the OnePlus 9RT 5G if you demand maximum performance for gaming and multitasking, and value the convenience of incredibly fast 65W charging. The 9RT is the clear winner for power users.